SuicideSundays

@paulgrey I mean the banks are dping more than exploring it because its a world financial mandate

The largest banks are not exploring blockchain because they want to “validate crypto.” They are doing it because they understand blockchain infrastructure is becoming banking infrastructure. Tokenized deposits, stablecoins, custody, settlement, payments, and digital identity are quickly becoming strategic questions for every financial institution. But there are more than 4,000 banks and more than 4,400 credit unions in the U.S. Most of them are not going to be part of a Wall Street-controlled consortium chain, and they should not have to depend on rails owned by the largest institutions. At @MetallicusTDBN, we help banks and credit unions launch blockchain infrastructure they can control. That could mean a consortium chain where multiple institutions validate together, or a dedicated chain where one institution is the sole validator. The key is ownership and interoperability. Banks and credit unions should be able to own their rails while still connecting to stablecoin networks, payment systems, other blockchains, and regulated financial applications. The future should not be one chain controlled by a few institutions. It should be institution-owned infrastructure connected through interoperable rails.

@MarkZinno @WOSLiveOfficial How many do you have?

@WOSLiveOfficial 2nd team all pro is nothing. It doesn’t actually count as an “All Pro” selection. There’s only one all pro team

I’ve never seen a fan base brag more about “2nd team All Pro” like #Falcons fans are right now …

@DrShenanigans69 @buckadeath You do know that recent US sanctions was in retaliation for countries adopting the GloBE tax right? They were accomodating for for the corporations and protecting them. You dont know what real sanctions look like.

@buckadeath Oh no! What are they going to do?...not steal our intellectual property?

We're about to find out what real sanctions look like

@afriedm1 @TedRall If proof was undeniable then historians would back it and your claims but they dont do they? Israel might not be going anywhere but you and your people are going to hell. Have a good life

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall This is astonishing levels of brainrot. No faith needed, proof is indisputable. Israel exists and isn't going anywhere, GFY hater.

If you lose 1,200 people, killing 400,000 in revenge is not "defending yourself."

@afriedm1 @TedRall Why would I be jealous of people who cannot verify their identity. I know exactly where I come from because my ancestors actually documented it.

A baseless claim doesn't need to be disputed. Read Jewish and non Jewish historical records, study archeology, genetics (Y chromosome studies) including Jewish communities who never left the land and 2500 y/o DNA from Jews in land, language, religious/cultural continuity (circumcision/dietary laws/prayers), shared oral/ written traditions (same Torah kept across the planet). Plenty of proof for those who aren't retarded bigots. Maybe you're jealous of a group with a bulletproof ancient identity who know exactly who they are.

@afriedm1 @TedRall If there was factual evidence people wouldnt need to put faith to help your legitimacy. Ive read history from multiple sources. That's why I know you have zero evidence to prove you and your grandparents had/have any claim on the land that is called israel today. Have a good life

@afriedm1 @TedRall It isnt my problem that you cant dispute it, thats for you to deal with. Bring some evidence that isnt a religious text and that historians can verify and maybe people wouldn't have doubts. Faith is meant for the divine, not your people's claims.

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall "today's Jews aren't the Jews of the Bible" nonsense is vapid. Get a life

@JamesJuneau11 @MPenixjr9fan He already did last year

@MPenixjr9fan Yea didn't u guys draft an impact guy in the 1st round? He'll help turn it around

How???????

@afriedm1 @TedRall Put on your critical thinking cap and surely itll come to your "superior" brain. If it doesnt, Im sure the internet can explain it for you.

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall What's filler stuff

@afriedm1 @TedRall *A particular jewish kingdom is what you mean. All the filler stuff (which supposedly gives your people modern rights to the land) cannot be confirmed. Thank you for playing, and have a nice life.

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall The Jewish kingdom written in them is confirmed through archeology

@afriedm1 @TedRall Not considered historical documents. Argue that with historians, not me.

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall There's history in them that's been confirmed extensively through scientific study like archeology

@marklevinshow Consider it reparations for Iraq

Israel has boots on the ground fighting Hezbollah terrorists who murdered Americans.  And they’re losing soldiers. Not a damn word of appreciation let alone acknowledgment. No role in deterring what’s in any deal. The countries that fund terrorism are actually making decisions at our behest about the future of the Israelis and Lebanese.  Just more insanity.

@afriedm1 @TedRall Yet you cant provide anything other than claims and faith. Religious texts arent historical documents. For a third time, have a good life

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall Wrong. Plenty of proof for those who aren't retarded

@afriedm1 @TedRall You cannot verify yours just as much as you cannot debunk mine. Again, have a good life

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall No it isn't. GFY

@JosephFordCotto If it wasnt a real country why were jews in Chicago claiming Palestine as their ethnicity during the World Fair there? The director of 'The Romancing of the People' boasted this publicly

'Palestine' isn't a real country. Do you agree?

@RabbiPoupko @IanCarrollShow So it is scripture now? Because I was told many times that the writings in the Talmud werent heavily refered to or regarded as holy word and only a few took it serious. Which is it rabbi? Because it cannot be both

@IanCarrollShow "The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose." (Shakespeare)

Then there's that other part of the talmud where it says if you rape a gentile baby of less than three years old its all good. And if a jew rapes a gentile woman she should be put to death for what she did to him. Or the part where it says jews have human souls and non-jews have animal souls. Yeah, maybe don't bring up the talmud bud. you don't want the gentiles to start reading the talmud.

@afriedm1 @TedRall My theory is just as credible as yours is. Have a good life

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall I'm glad to leave you to your delusion

@afriedm1 @TedRall Im glad you approve.

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall Cute theory

@afriedm1 @TedRall And you cant provide any evidence to your ancestral ties to this kingdom of the past except word of mouth and faith because somewhere along the way every single record of post biblical genealogy for your people was somehow destroyed. Zero records outside of religious texts?

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall Ya Jews had a kingdom in Israel

@afriedm1 @TedRall Are you talking about the religious texts that have never been regarded as historical? The ones where they actually recorded their genealogy extensively?

@SuicideAtSunday @TedRall You can't dig 2 feet in Israel without finding proof of the Jewish kingdom. Some famous books you can read about it. Such heartwarming concern.