WeAreTooMany

3.8K posts

WeAreTooMany banner
WeAreTooMany

WeAreTooMany

@TheLightons

Killed three at one blow. Five more to beat the record.

Melbourne, Australia, Earth Beigetreten Eylül 2013
447 Folgt80 Follower
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@dedzep101 @BenGrahamUK @alba_east I mean... Scientists brought the world's attention to acid rain, so people stopped pumping out the pollution causing it. Scientists brought attention to the ozone hole, so people stopped pumping out the pollution causing it. Scientists brought attention to climate change...
English
0
0
3
24
Dedzep
Dedzep@dedzep101·
@BenGrahamUK @alba_east I mean if we're listening to scientific data I should have died 20 years ago because of Acid Rain, the hole in the atmosphere greenhouse effect & more but hey it's climate change now right, sorry there's been so many apocalyptic events I lose track
English
3
0
1
84
Ben Graham
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUK·
We’re told a 1°C temperature rise is proof of man made climate catastrophe. Yet over billions of years, earth has seen far greater swings, ice ages, warming periods, all without fossil fuels. At what point do we question the narrative instead of blindly funding it?
Ben Graham tweet media
English
463
808
2.8K
42.1K
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@FactsMatterPpl @LarsTheBadMan @TheLightons Ok that’s great, sadly none of the evidence has demonstrated how evolution can create a new species, so far you’ve only demonstrated how animals develop genetics that can change certain traits but not others, for example dog breeds. Please prove how a non-dog becomes a dog
English
3
0
0
36
Lars Iggy
Lars Iggy@LarsTheBadMan·
Life on Earth says you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. 🤡 There are creatures alive today demonstrating how our eyes evolved.
Lars Iggy tweet media
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined

The human eye (and vertebrates in general) is perfectly designed for its purpose. Evolutionists often claim we have "backwards retinas" and this is evidence of "poor design" that no intelligent agent would use - so evolution makes more sense. They could not be more wrong. There are very good reasons the retina is positioned the way it is. 1. Retinal positioning gives the eyes better health and longevity. Light-sensing cells burn massive energy and produce toxins. The positioning of the retinas allows the nerves attached, which lead to the brain, to be bundled into a small hole. This allows the Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) layer in to feed the cells nutrients, clear toxins quickly, absorb stray light for better optics, and it helps shield against UV/sun damage. Without this, we’d likely go blind before adulthood. Evos often complain this gives us a blind spot - but when did you ever notice that? Each eye's blind spot, which only takes up maybe 1% of overall vision, overlaps with the other, rendering the blind spot unnoticeable. You're telling me evolution accidentally coordinated that? No no no. This is obviously designed. 2. Inverted retinas give us sharper vision. Evos say nerves in front of photoreceptors block light and ruin vision quality. This is flat out false. Vertebrates have the sharpest vision on Earth – eagles spot prey from 2–3 miles away. Oil droplets in photoreceptors help to boost color vision while mitochondria bundles help to focus light like tiny lenses, maximizing vision acuity. Vertebrate vision is of the highest quality on Earth. The orientation of the Retinal system in our eyes is optimal for their purpose. If the retinas were flipped the other way, like Cephalopods (who h Evos often use as a comparison), we would likely go blind before adulthood and have blurry vision at best. The eye is a perfectly designed, irreducibly complex system for vision. Irreducibly complex because it requires multiple systems to function: the light sensors, the pathway to send the light signal, and a processing center to interpret the signal (brain). Without all three systems, vision doesn't function. Even the very simplest vision system still requires this triune system. Vision cannot evolve. Life was designed. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

English
40
733
8.7K
209.8K
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan Actually, you made the original claim for no evidence that the human eye evolved, with no proof other than saying the science is wrong. We showed the accepted logical path of the evolution of the eye. You would not accept it. The human eye is too flawed to be called perfect.
English
1
0
1
11
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@TheLightons @LarsTheBadMan Yes it is your claim if you’re claiming it, that’s how debate works. And I understand it perfectly, that’s why I’ve never strawmaned evolution, I just don’t agree with it because it’s incorrect
English
1
0
0
12
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @FactsMatterPpl @LarsTheBadMan Actually, claiming a negative does requires proof if you want to be convincing. Simply saying "nah ah" is not a counterargument. Nor is "demonstrate it". You have not pointed out any incongruities or bad assumptions. Evolution is accepted and has 160 years of evidence behind it.
English
1
0
2
17
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@FactsMatterPpl @LarsTheBadMan @TheLightons In this debate I’m not arguing the affirmative, I’m arguing the negative. Which means I don’t have to posit anything to win, the burden of proof is on you and evolution if you claim it’s correct. So by pointing out logical incongruity and baseless assumptions, I have won
English
3
0
0
35
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan Ah, no. Not my claim. An accepted Theory that is supported by the available evidence. Yes, if you want to honestly critique a theory, you MUST at least understand the basics of it. Otherwise, you are just blowing wind based on what you think you know. Research Dunning-Kruger.
English
1
0
0
10
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@TheLightons @LarsTheBadMan I don’t have to research the theory myself it’s your claim, I don’t have to make your argument for you. All I’ve done is show you time and time again that no one can demonstrate evolution, that’s why you can’t
English
1
0
0
7
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@James_Hawke1 @plantblazer Your belief makes no sense, James. Your words make no sense, James. The images you post are not any clarification, James. Your posts make no sense, James. Another incomprehensible flat earther.
English
1
0
0
9
James Hawke
James Hawke@James_Hawke1·
@plantblazer @TheLightons * measured level across a horizontal. walls are flat. flat may be any orientation. But God has defined horizontal. This precision of deconstruction of spells is important. Those in trance states will now argue about "globe" from "globe" believe standpoint.
James Hawke tweet mediaJames Hawke tweet mediaJames Hawke tweet media
English
2
2
9
178
James Hawke
James Hawke@James_Hawke1·
This real word is NOT a globe in space. • rotation points (celestial poles) are not logical evidence the ground forms a sphere floating in space • ideas of 'globe world' are trained and based on modeled concepts (argued and assumed in reverse logic) • real evidence (repeatable/constant/known) does not permit a spinning spherical "space" based reality (physics says no) Time to gain a new clarity free from all false worldly trained concepts that have contained and constrained your mind and spirit. The Realm is a vast and wonderful unknown.🦋🌿
James Hawke tweet mediaJames Hawke tweet mediaJames Hawke tweet mediaJames Hawke tweet media
Sean Nicoara@snicoara

@James_Hawke1 Yep. I live in australia. It's curved. He'll i can even see the southern rotation point. That makes no sense on a flat earth.

English
21
6
40
1.8K
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@James_Hawke1 The gif you posted is literally why flerfers cannot accept the fact of the globe. You have no comprehension of scale, and think of the earth as a similar scale to your gif that people can circumnavigate within ten steps. In reality the earth would take 53,000,000 to trot around.
English
0
0
0
10
James Hawke
James Hawke@James_Hawke1·
The difference between people like us and people like you is that we thought about the issues more than you and went out and tested the ideas against the reality we live in rather than just swallow what we were told. Questions?
James Hawke tweet mediaJames Hawke tweet media
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons

@James_Hawke1 I am sick of seeing flerf garbage from multiple trolls and shitposters show up in my feed. I have obviously interacted too much with these reality deniers. I need to conscientiously stop clicking on this nonsense to repair my algorithm so that I see less of it. So hard to resist!

English
3
1
10
328
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@PatriotWolf14 @James_Hawke1 Are they my only two choices? Learn to love reading the same old crap from delusional flerfers, or delete my account? Are you the same sort of person who believes people should either love and support EVERYTHING about the country they live in, or emigrate?
English
0
0
0
10
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan Examine the theory? I see NO evidence that you have researched any of the science to honestly critique the theory. Smarter and better educated people than you have assessed the theory of evolution for over 160 years and found that it is well supported by the evidence collected.
English
1
0
1
17
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@TheLightons @LarsTheBadMan Notice how you strawman my argument and claim I’m using a story book to refute evolution but instead I’m simply examining the theory without making any truth claims to replace it. I’m allowed to point out the obvious faults in a theory without ever bringing up my own beliefs
English
2
0
0
11
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan "Probably in a book or something"? Mate, there are multitudes of books on science, including on biology, evolution and natural selection. This is not a platform that enables anyone to teach a thorough background in Darwin's theories. Find your local library. Get ye an education.
English
0
0
1
12
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@TheLightons @LarsTheBadMan Yeah the pictures didn’t demonstrate anything I explained that quite clearly. And again you resort to “I don’t know dude like it’s probably in a book or something, trust me bro”
English
2
0
0
16
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan You are comparing biological evolution to architectual fashion? Not quite the same thing, but "convergent evolution" is in architecture too (a new feature proves popular so that style of building is more likely to be built). Read a book on evolution and natural selection.
English
0
0
0
9
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@LarsTheBadMan @TheLightons So if two buildings have the same blueprints that means one came from the other? Even genetic similarity does not necessitate ancestry, evolution itself would agree because certain traits supposedly evolved in different species without any relation at all. Plus no demonstration
English
3
0
0
20
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@anika_climate I saw no climate scientist in that video. Where was the climate scientist who was to reveal the truth?
English
0
0
0
2
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🚨CLIMATE SCIENTIST REVEALS THE TRUTH! THIS IS WHAT I LEARNED AT UNIVERSITY!…“I thought I’d have a bit of FUN and turn what i learnt in university into the ‘10 CLIMATE COMMANDMENTS’….🏴‍☠️ 1. Thou shalt declare that CO2 shall heat the globe until the oceans boils over… 2. Thou shall speak of consensus and not of uncertainty….”
English
36
103
314
7K
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan You have no understanding of science or evidence so you are not ever going to be convinced of anything against your beliefs. Beliefs that are not demonstrated by anything except some stories written two thousand years ago. Read a book that is better researched and written.
English
1
0
1
13
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@LarsTheBadMan @TheLightons Ok sure so again you start by granting yourself life and cells themselves which is dubious. Then you show me a bunch of different and uniquely functioning organs across different species and just assume they came from each other because they look similar. Nothing demonstrated
English
2
0
0
27
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan Mate, evolution is a major component of biology. If you haven't had any education in science since 8th grade, I can't change that with a few 280 character posts. You were provided with video and images that demonstrated eye evolution. You want more? Go read a book. Easy to find.
English
1
0
2
23
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@TheLightons @LarsTheBadMan Lol literally “trust me bro” all I’m asking for is a demonstration, but of course that is impossible because you can’t demonstrate evolution, the whole theory reduces down to “trust me bro”
English
2
0
0
27
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@Jordanio_11 @LarsTheBadMan I'm never going to be able to prove evolution to a science denier, much less in 280 characters. Read a book. Get an education. Do some proper research. The evidence for evolution is there. Our eyes are not a "perfect design" - if we are intelligently designed, God is no engineer.
English
1
0
2
25
Jordanio
Jordanio@Jordanio_11·
@TheLightons @LarsTheBadMan This is all just speculation it never actually demonstrates how random mutation produces a perfectly functioning eye. Also at the very beginning they grant themselves a proto-eye which they didn’t bother explaining or justifying its existence.
English
2
0
0
30
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@BuckRight What is this "north star" of which you speak, and why have I never seen it above my home at night?
English
0
0
0
43
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@anika_climate You start many of your posts with "CLIMATE SCIENTIST ANSWERS PUBLIC QUESTIONS!", but you are not a climate scientist, @anika_climate, are you? That frequent lie should be enough to make anyone doubt anything you claim, to treat you as a fraud.
English
1
1
18
321
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🚨CLIMATE SCIENTIST ANSWERS PUBLIC QUESTIONS! Q: “Isn’t Carbon Dioxide a dangerous greenhouse gas?”, A: “This is another common misconception, it only comprises 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere…”
English
81
124
389
42.5K
WeAreTooMany
WeAreTooMany@TheLightons·
@king_of_hobbies @benwehrman Units of time are not related to each other - artificial landmarks to mark the passage of intervals. Based on earth's position in its orbit of the sun, or the moon's position in orbit of the earth, or earth's rotation around its axis.
English
0
0
0
9
₿en Wehrman
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·
Imagine believing that this is a random accident 😳
₿en Wehrman tweet media
English
33
31
154
50.2K