ZeroPointThree

@WillCruz @FastbreakHoops5 This is borderline reportable

@FastbreakHoops5 That is a loaded, well put together roster

Kobe won back-to-back titles with this roster 🐍

@goodserdboy @kevinxu I’m you

@Zero_PointThree @kevinxu who are you LMAO

6% free money sounds pretty good today

@Daddy083122 @Murjan76 @FlagBlack007 “Everyone is racist” <—- I agree it shouldn’t be illegal but I bet there are many, even on X, that would say they are not racist and really aren’t.

@Murjan76 @FlagBlack007 Racism isn’t illegal and it shouldn’t be. Or the entire world would be locked up. Everyone is racists bro, wake up and quit with your victim mentality and maybe you’ll get a hand up in life

My Neighbor & His racist music . Thoughts 💭 ⁉️

@goodserdboy @kevinxu More than half a milly a year to sit on my ass, I’ll take it

@kevinxu hahahaha you liquidated it all for 6%

@olympicbron He would’ve stayed in front of him. And Pippen would have straight up locked him down.

Crazy but true: Michael Jordan has never guarded a player better than KD in his existence😭

@Jvnior People choose to hate Jews when really it’s a skill issue

🚨🇱🇹 LIVE FOOTAGE: Lithuanian man confronts jews for spitting on Christians He starts spitting on them. Priceless.

@tsirhcsusejlaer @kangminlee No, if she had me someone like me she would’ve been satisfied and not felt like anything was missing in her life.

@Zero_PointThree @kangminlee People like you are the reason she took the dildo out of her cunt and shoved it up her asshole, bro.

She’s so small lmao no one believes this is a man

@JohnWack20 @harrymichR @WadePlem How about call the foul when it happens like normal sports

@Zero_PointThree @harrymichR @WadePlem Nah you're just simply tarded 🤣 either understand the game or dont bother watching

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME THEY USED VAR TO TAKE AWAY THE GOAL AFTER EGYPT TOOK THE BALL THE FULL LENGTH OF THE FIELD AND SCORED?!?!? There's no way that makes any sense..

@harrymichR @WadePlem This game sucks and has crappy rules

@WadePlem Always the yanks init🤣🤣 Fucking retard

@mert Hey quick question, why’d you delete this?

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

@BrandonCro96736 @AntonioSabatoJr I believe the video statements but I also know it was AI generated because Rodman was never close to being that eloquent, lol

@AntonioSabatoJr Y'all really believe this video this was AI generated by the way

Jordan is the 🐐

Rule change idea: Keep the offside rule everywhere on the field except inside the penalty area. Once an attacker enters the box, offside no longer applies. Defenders would have to actually mark runners instead of relying on the offside trap, making crosses, cutbacks, and rebounds far more dangerous while still preventing long-distance goal hanging. This would create more exciting attacking soccer while preserving the purpose of the offside rule everywhere else.

@Zero_PointThree @jimmy_dore You try to play without offside and you will invent it yourself. Red card is dreadfull. You basically did murder on the field, your team now has to play in 10. For that you also are punished one game after. Reason... although doesn't look like, football hits are really serious.

I’m watching USA vs. Belgium, I know this is a dumb American take, but I can’t get over wishing the field was smaller & they used boards like in hockey . It also seems they’re all of equal talent, is there a Michael Jordan of soccer in this tournament? Id gladly watch that. Weird that I’m watching and rooting for USA in sport that doesn’t appeal to me.

@EvanKirstel @bookmakerxyz He always looks like he needs to take a shit

USA players against Belgium after realizing every VAR check goes through Truth Social first

@InsaneFrog Give me 15 mins and a room with her and she’ll walk out as Ellen again.

Replies disabled lmao

How I would implement offsides in soccer…. (AI cleaned this up for me): Proposal: Penalty Area Offside Exception Objective Increase attacking opportunities, scoring chances, and excitement while preserving the tactical structure of soccer across most of the field. Proposed Law Change The offside law remains in effect everywhere on the field except inside the defending team’s penalty area. An attacking player who is physically inside the opponent’s penalty area at the moment a teammate plays the ball cannot be penalized for offside. All other aspects of the offside law remain unchanged. Rationale The current offside law often prevents dangerous attacking movements and encourages defenders to rely on stepping forward to create offside rather than defending attackers directly. Limiting the offside exception to the penalty area would: * Increase goal-scoring opportunities. * Reward creative passing and intelligent movement in the attacking third. * Encourage defenders to mark attackers instead of relying primarily on the offside trap. * Preserve the tactical importance of midfield play and pressing because offside would still apply over the majority of the pitch. Expected Benefits * More goals and high-quality scoring chances. * More exciting crosses, cutbacks, and close-range finishes. * Reduced controversy over marginal offside decisions near goal. * Greater emphasis on individual defending inside the penalty area. Potential Risks * Attackers may remain in the penalty area for extended periods while waiting for service. * Defenses may become more compact around the goal. * Teams may adopt new tactical systems that prioritize penalty-area occupation. Trial Recommendation Implement the rule in a preseason tournament or domestic cup competition for one season. Measure: * Goals per match. * Expected goals (xG). * Number of shots inside the penalty area. * Match tempo and ball-in-play time. * Fan, player, coach, and referee feedback. If the trial increases entertainment without significantly harming competitive balance, the rule should be considered for broader adoption.

Here ya go. I worked with AI to help describe my idea….. Proposal: Penalty Area Offside Exception Objective Increase attacking opportunities, scoring chances, and excitement while preserving the tactical structure of soccer across most of the field. Proposed Law Change The offside law remains in effect everywhere on the field except inside the defending team’s penalty area. An attacking player who is physically inside the opponent’s penalty area at the moment a teammate plays the ball cannot be penalized for offside. All other aspects of the offside law remain unchanged. Rationale The current offside law often prevents dangerous attacking movements and encourages defenders to rely on stepping forward to create offside rather than defending attackers directly. Limiting the offside exception to the penalty area would: * Increase goal-scoring opportunities. * Reward creative passing and intelligent movement in the attacking third. * Encourage defenders to mark attackers instead of relying primarily on the offside trap. * Preserve the tactical importance of midfield play and pressing because offside would still apply over the majority of the pitch. Expected Benefits * More goals and high-quality scoring chances. * More exciting crosses, cutbacks, and close-range finishes. * Reduced controversy over marginal offside decisions near goal. * Greater emphasis on individual defending inside the penalty area. Potential Risks * Attackers may remain in the penalty area for extended periods while waiting for service. * Defenses may become more compact around the goal. * Teams may adopt new tactical systems that prioritize penalty-area occupation. Trial Recommendation Implement the rule in a preseason tournament or domestic cup competition for one season. Measure: * Goals per match. * Expected goals (xG). * Number of shots inside the penalty area. * Match tempo and ball-in-play time. * Fan, player, coach, and referee feedback. If the trial increases entertainment without significantly harming competitive balance, the rule should be considered for broader adoption.

@Zero_PointThree @RealSkipBayless Can you please figure out the offside rule for us then please superior American overlord

Now you will hear the global outcry that justice prevailed on the pitch 4-1 vs the big bad bully US. I will agree that Balogun’s unprecedented reinstatement motivated Belgium far more than it helped us.

I worked with AI to help describe my idea….. Proposal: Penalty Area Offside Exception Objective Increase attacking opportunities, scoring chances, and excitement while preserving the tactical structure of soccer across most of the field. Proposed Law Change The offside law remains in effect everywhere on the field except inside the defending team’s penalty area. An attacking player who is physically inside the opponent’s penalty area at the moment a teammate plays the ball cannot be penalized for offside. All other aspects of the offside law remain unchanged. Rationale The current offside law often prevents dangerous attacking movements and encourages defenders to rely on stepping forward to create offside rather than defending attackers directly. Limiting the offside exception to the penalty area would: * Increase goal-scoring opportunities. * Reward creative passing and intelligent movement in the attacking third. * Encourage defenders to mark attackers instead of relying primarily on the offside trap. * Preserve the tactical importance of midfield play and pressing because offside would still apply over the majority of the pitch. Expected Benefits * More goals and high-quality scoring chances. * More exciting crosses, cutbacks, and close-range finishes. * Reduced controversy over marginal offside decisions near goal. * Greater emphasis on individual defending inside the penalty area. Potential Risks * Attackers may remain in the penalty area for extended periods while waiting for service. * Defenses may become more compact around the goal. * Teams may adopt new tactical systems that prioritize penalty-area occupation. Trial Recommendation Implement the rule in a preseason tournament or domestic cup competition for one season. Measure: * Goals per match. * Expected goals (xG). * Number of shots inside the penalty area. * Match tempo and ball-in-play time. * Fan, player, coach, and referee feedback. If the trial increases entertainment without significantly harming competitive balance, the rule should be considered for broader adoption.

@Zero_PointThree @jimmy_dore I played a tournament with no offside rule. It was awful. One guy just standing by the goalie, defense just sags back so no fast breaks. Very dull but I understand what you’re saying.

I worked with AI to help describe my idea, since all the people you mentioned in all this time couldn’t….. Proposal: Penalty Area Offside Exception Objective Increase attacking opportunities, scoring chances, and excitement while preserving the tactical structure of soccer across most of the field. Proposed Law Change The offside law remains in effect everywhere on the field except inside the defending team’s penalty area. An attacking player who is physically inside the opponent’s penalty area at the moment a teammate plays the ball cannot be penalized for offside. All other aspects of the offside law remain unchanged. Rationale The current offside law often prevents dangerous attacking movements and encourages defenders to rely on stepping forward to create offside rather than defending attackers directly. Limiting the offside exception to the penalty area would: * Increase goal-scoring opportunities. * Reward creative passing and intelligent movement in the attacking third. * Encourage defenders to mark attackers instead of relying primarily on the offside trap. * Preserve the tactical importance of midfield play and pressing because offside would still apply over the majority of the pitch. Expected Benefits * More goals and high-quality scoring chances. * More exciting crosses, cutbacks, and close-range finishes. * Reduced controversy over marginal offside decisions near goal. * Greater emphasis on individual defending inside the penalty area. Potential Risks * Attackers may remain in the penalty area for extended periods while waiting for service. * Defenses may become more compact around the goal. * Teams may adopt new tactical systems that prioritize penalty-area occupation. Trial Recommendation Implement the rule in a preseason tournament or domestic cup competition for one season. Measure: * Goals per match. * Expected goals (xG). * Number of shots inside the penalty area. * Match tempo and ball-in-play time. * Fan, player, coach, and referee feedback. If the trial increases entertainment without significantly harming competitive balance, the rule should be considered for broader adoption.

@Zero_PointThree @nicksortor Oh, thank you, all these people who made and changed the rules from 19th century until now must've been all stupid, but luckily we found a murican who can solve all these problems.

WE CANNOT LOSE TO A COUNTRY WHOSE ONLY NOTICEABLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE WORLD IS HOTEL WAFFLES. COME ON USA

I worked with AI to help describe my idea….. Proposal: Penalty Area Offside Exception Objective Increase attacking opportunities, scoring chances, and excitement while preserving the tactical structure of soccer across most of the field. Proposed Law Change The offside law remains in effect everywhere on the field except inside the defending team’s penalty area. An attacking player who is physically inside the opponent’s penalty area at the moment a teammate plays the ball cannot be penalized for offside. All other aspects of the offside law remain unchanged. Rationale The current offside law often prevents dangerous attacking movements and encourages defenders to rely on stepping forward to create offside rather than defending attackers directly. Limiting the offside exception to the penalty area would: * Increase goal-scoring opportunities. * Reward creative passing and intelligent movement in the attacking third. * Encourage defenders to mark attackers instead of relying primarily on the offside trap. * Preserve the tactical importance of midfield play and pressing because offside would still apply over the majority of the pitch. Expected Benefits * More goals and high-quality scoring chances. * More exciting crosses, cutbacks, and close-range finishes. * Reduced controversy over marginal offside decisions near goal. * Greater emphasis on individual defending inside the penalty area. Potential Risks * Attackers may remain in the penalty area for extended periods while waiting for service. * Defenses may become more compact around the goal. * Teams may adopt new tactical systems that prioritize penalty-area occupation. Trial Recommendation Implement the rule in a preseason tournament or domestic cup competition for one season. Measure: * Goals per match. * Expected goals (xG). * Number of shots inside the penalty area. * Match tempo and ball-in-play time. * Fan, player, coach, and referee feedback. If the trial increases entertainment without significantly harming competitive balance, the rule should be considered for broader adoption.

@Zero_PointThree @nicksortor Can you please tell us your idea to replace the offside rule without ruining the game. Should each team have one player stationed on the penalty spot at all times?