KK的AI笔记
63 posts

KK的AI笔记
@ainotes_KK
只讲大家都听得懂的AI视频 合作微信:kerry_668






一字不差的把我公众号文章搬运到推特,然后文章内的截图还打上了自己的码。要点脸吗?洗稿都不会洗?封面不换,结构不改,内容照搬,最后再把自己的码贴上去装原创,真是又懒又贪。 做内容做成这样,连最基本的脸都不要了。你要是真没能力写,可以不写;没素材可以不发;靠偷别人的文章给自己导流,还装得像自己写出来的一样,这种吃相真的难看。 更搞笑的是,偷都偷了,洗稿都不会洗,连标题、排版、截图都懒得动一下。互联网搬运垃圾见多了,但搬得这么明目张胆、这么低级的,也算少见。


UPDATE: Came up with an even better version of this prompt after the feedback Ask Codex to look across your sessions, Memories, and Chronicle, identify patterns, reuse what already exists, and only create the smallest useful skill, subagent, or automation. "Look back over my recent work from the last 30 days, or all available history if shorter, and identify repeated manual workflows worth packaging. Use available evidence in this order: - Recent Codex sessions and task summaries. - Codex Memories and rollout summaries to find patterns repeated across sessions. - Chronicle, if enabled, to spot repeated work outside Codex. Use Chronicle for discovery only; confirm important details in the relevant source system when possible. - Existing skills, custom agents, and automations, so you reuse or extend what already exists instead of duplicating it. Look broadly for work that is repeated, time-consuming, error-prone, context-heavy, or benefits from a consistent process. Include workflows across coding, research, writing, planning, communication, operations, analysis, and personal administration. Only act on a candidate when it: - occurred at least twice, or is clearly likely to recur and costly to repeat; - has stable inputs, a repeatable procedure, and a clear output or stopping condition; - would materially improve speed, quality, consistency, or reliability; - is not already adequately covered. Choose the smallest appropriate form: - Skill: a reusable workflow or playbook. - Custom subagent: a bounded specialist role or investigation task suitable for delegation. - Automation: a scheduled or recurring check, report, reminder, or monitor. - Skip: work that is too one-off, ambiguous, sensitive, or poorly evidenced to package. First produce a compact shortlist with: - repeated workflow - supporting evidence and dates - frequency/confidence - recommended form: skill, subagent, automation, extend existing, or skip - why it is or is not worth creating Then create only the high-confidence missing items. Keep them narrow, practical, source-aware, and easy to validate. Do not create speculative, overlapping, or overly broad assets. Finish with: - what you created or extended - what you deliberately skipped - what needs more evidence before packaging"







