Albinmrc

398 posts

Albinmrc banner
Albinmrc

Albinmrc

@albinmrc

Economist - Financial and RWA Advisor - Ethereum Uruguay Cofounder - Powering AI to the @skyecosystem Risk Framework

Montevideo Beigetreten Aralık 2011
985 Folgt420 Follower
Albinmrc retweetet
Rune
Rune@RuneKek·
1) While broader crypto is in shambles, Maker continues to grow its position as the biggest in DeFi Everyone else shitcoin'd and ponzi'd. Maker built stuff that works & in the last month Dai grew by 400m Next up is SubDAOs and they will be a gamechanger for growth in crypto
Rune tweet media
English
15
74
443
140.9K
Albinmrc retweetet
Michael Bentley
Michael Bentley@euler_mab·
Bailout is obviously good for everyone affected and more broadly for DeFi. But all the same problems remain. Aave v3 is still a complete mess of a lending protocol and needs major surgery. It was ludicrous it was marketed as a risk free rate. Isolated markets for the win.
English
15
7
137
8.5K
Albinmrc retweetet
Twin
Twin@twinfinance_·
Stablecoins are moving from crypto native experiments to regulated financial infrastructure. That shift is already happening in LatAm.
English
0
2
9
413
Pablo Sabbatella
Pablo Sabbatella@PabloSabbatella·
@albinmrc Great post. Would like to see a detailed article about it.
English
1
0
1
755
Albinmrc
Albinmrc@albinmrc·
Obsessing over avoiding duration risk often exposes us to much more serious risks that can’t be solved by simply matching asset and liability durations. DeFi needs to dig into this. I think that by prioritizing “instant liquidity”, we often end up mispricing risk. When an asset is used as stablecoin collateral, we start treating it as if it could always be sold, at any size, at “the price”. That makes us focus on liquidation mechanics and ignore more basic questions: – Who is actually behind this collateral (credit risk) – Whether the protocol and its assumptions really hold under stress – If the oracle price is actually tradable in size – What happens to liquidity and slippage when everyone needs to sell – And how many other protocols depend on the same assets and liquidity Maybe we should accept a bit more duration risk and design liabilities that actually match the assets. Not everything needs to be instant liquidity. Assets with pull to par and low credit risk can be great collateral and make the system much more robust.
English
1
0
3
889
Albinmrc
Albinmrc@albinmrc·
@marc1_1965 @claudiosavoia wtf! que en este siglo alguien no sepa las atrocidades q hace/hizo china toda la vida (date una vuelta x el tibet el genocidio de 2M) q diga q Putin no invade ni somete a nadie....ya es 1 poco demasiado y creo que igual Iran debe ser el peor de los 3.....
Español
0
0
0
16
Marcelo Crixo ✊🏻
Marcelo Crixo ✊🏻@marc1_1965·
@claudiosavoia Rusos, chinos e iraníes jamás sometieron a ningún pueblo y lo saquearon. Cosa que EEUU no puede decir. Y, en todo caso, yo mal de unos no se justifica con el de otros.
Español
11
0
3
435
Albinmrc retweetet
Stable Summit 🦫
Stable Summit 🦫@stable_summit·
@albinmrc called out the hard truth: DeFi isn’t creating value if yields come from incentives, opacity or private deals you can’t verify. Why are we putting the most illiquid TradFi assets onchain instead of transparent, market-priced ones? Listen 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=j60n68…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
2
10
1.8K
Albinmrc retweetet
BlackRock
BlackRock@BlackRock·
Tokenization is shaping the next evolution of global markets. In @TheEconomist, Larry Fink and Rob Goldstein discuss how tokenization can modernize market infrastructure, enhancing efficiency, transparency, and access by connecting traditional and digital finance. Read more:
BlackRock tweet mediaBlackRock tweet media
English
528
1.1K
4.3K
2.2M
Albinmrc retweetet
Stable Summit 🦫
Stable Summit 🦫@stable_summit·
Thank you to everyone who joined us for Stable Summit! In Argentina stablecoins are actually used and not just discussed on panels. Hosting this edition in this amazing country felt just right. The sessions reflected that mix of real-world demand and ongoing innovation across the space. Appreciation to @StakeCapital for hosting and to @CurveFinance for supporting as our ambassador. Thank you to all the speakers, builders, researchers, and teams who spent 2 days comparing models, debating integrations, and exploring how stablecoins fit into a more decentralized financial system. Check out the vibes!
English
20
11
62
4.5K
Pablo Sabbatella
Pablo Sabbatella@PabloSabbatella·
@albinmrc Loved it. I want to read more on these topics, with this point of view.
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 🇦🇷 English
1
0
2
137
Albinmrc
Albinmrc@albinmrc·
Real World Assets today is all about trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. In this meeting of two radically different worlds, there’s a huge gap in financial literacy. In DeFi, very few people understand risk analysis, portfolio construction, or financial planning. Everything is “on sight,” overcollateralized, and superficial. Few users know how to read or price risk. For most of them, yield is the only truth, and anything with a low standard deviation feels “safe.” They farm relentlessly, chasing returns without much regard for what lies beneath. Meanwhile, those from TradFi don’t grasp how DeFi is built, the speed, the lack of loyalty in how capital moves, the fact that past performance rules above everything. They tend to ignore structural risks like smart contract failures, liquidations, or incentive misalignments. DeFi doesn’t forgive inefficiency. TradFi, on the other hand, is full of it, yet it also relies on regulation, human judgment, and the institutional frameworks meant to protect the broader system Apart form the always mentioned liquidity and market trading hours that complicate price feeds, in TradFi when things spiral, there are rules that stop the storm, circuit breakers, trading halts, pauses so everyone can think. The industry values that markets close, people rest, statements are made, and order is restored. DeFi, instead, celebrates 24/7 trading, pure freedom. Having lived through Lehman’s collapse, I support freedom deeply, (and I know we’re probably moving toward it ) but I also wonder how an open, infinite market would absorb that level of disruption. What I hope is not to see one side misleading the other. Both have so much to offer. Now institutions are entering the ecosystem at scale, it’s a true game-changer. I’m curious to see how it unfolds, whether it will bring balance between the rigor and discipline of TradFi, and the innovation and openness that make DeFi so powerful. So far I see the asymmetry of information as a red flag. I am afraid we might be building systemic risk by bringing too many illiquid and non transparent assets onchain, in the search for absolute yield.
English
3
2
13
6.3K