

Anduin Lothar
472 posts









Kudos to the @Jaileddotfun team. They took me yapping and sharing this, and actually updated the perms.




I see 4 possible outcomes to this controversy: 1) Resolve to Yes > Goes against their market, their rules and many posts made by the team > Would cause an uproar and controversy on the timeline > Keeps whales happy. Alpha1 has bought $380k additional shares in the past 6 hours. Top 2 holders each risking $850k+ to make $850. Losing them is bad for the platform 2) They cancel the market > Requires refunding fees > Refunding traders? > Boring 3) They resolve it to 50/50 > Yes holders take a 50% loss > No holders get a 50x 4) Resolve to No > 98x, I buy my dream Porsche on the spot 1/4 loss 1/4 neutral 2/4 pay 50x to 98x, good r/r for me


If this is reversed, $100 → $9,820 Predict Traders are contesting "Will Lighter launch a governance token before 2026", as Lighter has never stated it's a governance token Predict is essentially putting the burden on Polymarket, their competitor, to solve one of their markets This is equivalent to Apple relying on Microsoft to make a decision about their iOS To be clear, I DO NOT see this being reversed, however I took a small "no" position just in case Especially since Dingaling had posted "If you believe that the token is not a governance token, you're free to buy No" while the market was still live However, I've been shocked many times in this industry. Tough position for the team to be in. Hope they vote for what's right (my bags 🤞)

Gosh. I love these days in ct - from the @Lighter_xyz listing to the @predictdotfun scandal. Literally watching every thread and every Discord message. Freaking exciting to see how it all plays out.






