Angehefteter Tweet
aniwasbored
42 posts

aniwasbored
@ani3am
Build first, ask later. Shipping things, breaking new tech, reading crypto charts. Currently: Shopify tools. Next: who knows.
San Francisco Beigetreten Ekim 2024
26 Folgt7 Follower

caught claude code doing something that matters.
asked it to use playwright and audit my site like a user.
it looked like it was scrolling, but it was skipping chunks of the page.
if you're using agents for UX audits, make them prove contiguous screenshots.
otherwise you're auditing the gaps.

English

AMD just made Nvidia's AI strategy look very expensive.
Lisa Su walked on stage with a tiny PC.
Then ran a 235B parameter AI model locally.
No cloud.
No data center.
No $4,000 GPU.
Just a $1,499 machine.
The secret isn't raw compute.
It's memory.
AMD's new Ryzen AI Max+ 395 lets the CPU and GPU share up to 128GB of unified memory.
That changes everything.
Most consumer GPUs hit a wall long before giant models fit into memory.
This box doesn't.
While everyone is chasing bigger GPUs, AMD quietly built something that can run models previously reserved for serious AI servers.
And the results are turning heads:
→ 235B parameter models running locally
→ Massive memory advantage over flagship gaming GPUs
→ DeepSeek R1 inference outperforming hardware that costs significantly more
But the bigger story isn't the benchmark.
It's what happens next.
Today, power users are stacking subscriptions:
$200/month for Claude
$200/month for ChatGPT
$20/month for Cursor
$20/month for Gemini
Thousands of dollars every year just to access AI.
Now imagine owning the hardware once and running powerful models on your desk.
Private.
Offline.
Unlimited.
No rate limits.
No API bills.
No waiting for cloud capacity.
The AI race is shifting from "who has access" to "who can run it locally."
And the people who spot that shift early usually win big.
The AI hardware war just entered a very interesting new phase.
English

@steipete that makes sense.
so the real advantage is sovereignty + model choice?
i’m curious where openclaw wins in daily dev work vs claude code beyond the platform philosophy.
English

@ani3am depends if you care about an open platform and model choice or being locked in to one company that decides which prompts are okay and which will be blocked or routed to weaker models.
English

@elonmusk who else feels uncanny valley with these video generation models?
English

@Rasmic @DarioAmodei they already require age checks and ID verification
likely very soon
English

@DanielSmidstrup because @AnthropicAI realized early that the real juice is in business-facing development, not the attention economy.
images/video are distribution-native.
claude is workflow-native.
different game.
English

@rezoundous gemini is impressive because it somehow found the overlap between “not what i wanted” and “why did this cost that much”
English

@sflorimm if you are an aspiring founder, audience first
unmatched power in learning from others
you become unstoppable
English

the harder question is capital formation.
you can move the entity to a more sovereign jurisdiction, maybe the caribbean, singapore, uae, etc.
but frontier ai is not a normal software business. it needs talent density, compute access, institutional capital, and regulatory credibility.
so the tradeoff is:
more sovereignty, less capital gravity
more capital gravity, more political exposure
not obvious there’s a clean answer.
English

@TTrimoreau i think both are true.
ai takes old-world jobs away.
but it also creates the transition into the new world.
the people willing to face that transition, learn the tools, and rebuild their workflow get to be part of what comes next.
English












