@Dr4con1a@lesbiancapulet Literally all you have to do is put “terfs dni” somewhere because with no context they’ll assume you’re agreeing with them, that’s just an unfortunate fact
Notioromantic !
Link(s) in replies!
“For those who identify as aromantic/arospec and fantasises/enjoys the idea or concept of romance but does not desire a romantic relationship and/or is repulsed by real romance.” – Tumblr user malegirlmachine
@rowdyrohannie No it’s bisexual but also describes the specific feeling of being both wlw and mlm as a multi gendered person
I agree calling it gaybian is dumb I think sapphilean would clear up the confusion more
@atimerz no? i mean, bisexual, pansexual and omnisexual don't share the same meaning despite all being under the bisexual umbrella
however gaybian is just bisexual but with gay and lesbian as some unnecessary useless decorations to “spice it up”
white people be like : yeah i'm a gaybian, please don't call me a bisexual.. that's a slur to us gaybians. if you call me a bisexual you're the most transphobic person ever
@rowdyrohannie I do agree the name is problematic, it should be called sapphilean instead, but by your logic aren’t pansexual and omnisexual also offensive to bisexuals because they all describe attraction to all genders just more specifically
@atimerz yeah because those are like, cisgender bisexuals
bisexual multigenders such as enbies can totally experience sapphic and achillean attraction at once. therefore there's no reason for that ‘gaybian’ term as the name itself already offends like, 3 communities (bi gay and lesbian)
@rowdyrohannie They’re genderfluid/bigender and their attraction to women is sapphic/wlw while their attraction to men is achelian/mlm what’s so confusing?
@smiskidean@_mollycoddles Someone who’s sapphic (women attracted to women) and achillean (men attracted to men) at the same time due to being genderfluid or bigender
@ST4RV3S How is someone only exclusively attracted to binary men and women when nonbinary is such a broad spectrum? Every sexuality is going to include at least some nonbinary people
@rowdyrohannie They’re genderfluid/bigender and their attraction to women is sapphic/wlw while their attraction to men is achelian/mlm what’s so confusing?
I think a lot of the confusion around this would be eliminated if it said sapphic/achellian attraction instead of lesbian and gay and specified it’s for multigender people cuz this makes perfect sense to me it’s just the wording is a bit awkward