Allons

@patcondell We are too individualist unlike other races who have a tribal mentality. Our prosperity has made us too comfortable for our own good. We have faith in a democracy that is just a fig leaf. We are, therefore, easily ruled by those who wish us harm.

We in the West have become too civilised for our own good. We’ve put too much faith in society’s institutions. We’ve let our natural defences down. We’re losing our instinct for self-preservation. We’ll be the death of ourselves if we don’t wake up.

@harukaawake @ByrneBarry Watch that your "elites "don't sell you out as they have done to us in the West. Don't listen to what they say, watch what they do.

🇯🇵 Currently, Japan is under a lot of pressure to adopt the failed immigration policies of the UK, France etc. However, no matter what they tell us, Japan will always remain unapologetically Japanese. We will never change who we are.

While indigenous British women were being mass-raped by foreigners, he was pushing for mass migration. Now that his people have been bothered by the very issue they created, he wants our help.

The Neo-Communist/Islamic Alliance is real. Islamic clerics state immigration and jihad are inter-dependent. Spanish PM Sanchez is importing 1M+ Muslim males Sanchez is President of the Socialist International UN chief Guterres was President before him

@PWestoff @SnailStrike @angharadjbuxton I like the last sentence.

You seem exceptionally ignorant. Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists invaded Poland TOGETHER in 1939. The very worst Concentration Camps were in Communist controlled Eastern Poland. Economics aside, there is no difference between Nazism and Communism - apart from the fact that Communism killed tens-of-millions of their own people in Gulags. Both systems are dictatorships, but Communism was worse because it operated as an Absolute Monarchy, where the senior Communist was the effective King who owned everything within his State (and could kill his Serfs at the stroke of a pen) and the Politburo was his Royal Court of Aristocrats. As I say, your ignorance is so mind-blowing one can only assume you are a brainwashed university graduate.

I urge everyone to read the post below from Simon Elmer. Simon is a leftist, not a "rabid far-rightist." His research is meticulous and forensic. He is writing about THE most important issue of our times which could see the total collapse of Western civilisation. We must not read Simon's warning though. It is deemed "hateful" and his book must be burned. This could not happen in a free society. The implications are chilling. Gulags are not very far away now. The Establishment's non-violent war against us us total. It won't remain non-violent. Wake up.

@umbongo_ed @MarkHiggie2 We certainly do. Mike, what's his name, blocked me for pointing it out. Apparently his dad saved one from those evil Nazis 100 years ago.

@conduit172 @MarkHiggie2 And we know who runs the movie industry don’t we Allons?

Is it any wonder that so many people don’t bother with the movies any more? The producers of ‘The Choral’ went to huge effort to recreate a small Yorkshire mill-town in 1916 - except in one important area. In terms of ethnic composition they make it look like modern urban Britain, which small town Yorkshire in 1916 obviously wasn’t. No character in the movie comments on what would have been very unusual at the time, let alone expresses racism, though we get plenty of prejudice against Germans and homosexuals. They might as well have allowed the appearance in the film of mobile phones. It’s become standard practice for movie producers to depict Britain’s past as one of racial diversity in historic situations when it plainly didn’t exist. Adding to the oddity, the producers, part of a world which is usually so quick to see racism in Britain’s past, create an ideal world of racial harmony. It’s curious that ethnic minorities themselves don’t object to such ahistorical depictions. Meanwhile woke reviewers even in the conservative media clearly feel it would be bad form to mention this issue. And many potential audience members feel that these days going to the movies is to subject themselves to a social engineering exercise.

@Nic_Jane_Taylor @JaydaBF She already is.

@JaydaBF 🤢 she needs to be removed from civilisation!

She’s going to have her child killed because she’s “homeless right now” and “don’t have much to offer the baby” but she’s got the money for nails, weave & lashes. Unfathomable selfishness. I can’t believe I live in a time when this is considered normal.

@UKFreedomCamp And now we see who was correct.

Metaphorically speaking, Enoch Powell was crucified politically for the Rivers of Blood speech. The backlash from the British political establishment and mainstream media was swift and brutal: Edward Heath, the Conservative leader, sacked him from the Shadow Cabinet the very next day (21 April 1968), describing the speech as “racialist in tone” and it was called “unacceptable” by senior party figures. Senior Shadow Cabinet colleagues threatened to resign unless he was removed. In liberal and Westminster circles he became a pariah almost overnight, with newspapers like The Times branding it “an evil speech.” Yet the public reaction was the exact opposite. Opinion polls at the time showed roughly 70–74 % of the British public agreed with what he had said. Thousands of letters poured in (over 43,000 in the first week alone), dockers and meat porters marched on Parliament chanting “We want Enoch!”, and he was treated as a hero by large sections of the working class who felt the elite had ignored their concerns about immigration. The speech effectively ended any realistic chance Powell had of becoming Conservative leader or returning to high office. He stayed an MP, later defected to the Ulster Unionists, but was largely frozen out by the party hierarchy for the rest of his career. Supporters have long framed it a political crucifixion or martyrdom for daring to speak what many ordinary people believed was an uncomfortable truth. In the eyes of the establishment he was a dangerous bigot, but In the eyes of a huge chunk of the public he was a prophet who paid the price for speaking out.

@Clint_Davey1 Left wing whites are immune to logic; they couldn't stop yapping about the evil of apartheid in South African but are completely blind to the state of the country now.

To all the Rhodesia haters in the comments - how is Zimbabwe doing now? Must be great with all those yucky racists gone, right? You replaced the evil Ian Smith with the noble and righteous Robert Mugabe. So how is it over there?

Surely reporting this case must be in the public interest? I’m certainly interested….

@PWestoff Your family won't be able to hold their luxury beliefs for ever. I live in what was until recently a white,low crime, fairly affluent area. Things are changing; I can't leave the house now with out seeing Africans and Muslims. The nearest city has undergone the same change.

I received the following heart-breaking comment from a reader on my recent Substack article about left-liberals' bewildering reaction to migrant horrors inflicted on their own children. Quote: My family considers themselves champions of the underdog. In their minds, they occupy the moral high ground, guided by a compass that points toward the marginalised and the displaced. But I have learned that this compassion is often an abstract luxury, a fashion statement of the soul that carries a high price for those of us living on the ground. Several years ago, the worldview my family holds dear manifested in my life not as a political debate, but as a violent home invasion and a rape. The perpetrator was an illegal immigrant who had forced entry into my sanctuary. When the news broke, I didn’t just lose my sense of safety; I lost my family’s recognition. They didn’t just fail to support me, they effectively edited the event out of our shared history. To acknowledge my trauma would be to admit a flaw in the narrative they have built their identities upon. This is the hallmark of the "luxury belief." From the safety of more affluent spaces, my family can advocate for mass immigration and the housing of undocumented individuals in lower-income areas. They do not have to live with the demographic shifts, the strain on local infrastructure, or the security risks that often concentrate in the poorest postcodes. For them, these policies are a way to signal "reputational vanity" to their peers. For me, they are the literal walls of my neighbourhood. Perhaps the most painful part of this radicalisation is the selective nature of their empathy. My family has developed a profound resentment toward the white working class, the very "underdogs" they might have supported decades ago. Now, that demographic is viewed with snobbery or outright contempt. When a member of a "protected" group is harmed, they are the first to cry out for justice. But when the victim is white and poor, and the perpetrator doesn’t fit the desired political script, the silence is deafening. In their quest to be "progressive," they have become remarkably regressive in their humanity. They have traded the messy, difficult duty of caring for a traumatised daughter for the clean, ego-stroking comfort of a political slogan. They have forgotten that true compassion starts with the person standing right in front of you, regardless of whether their pain is politically convenient. I see them once a year now. We speak, but we do not communicate. They remain comfortably radicalised , shielded by their status, while I am left to carry the weight of a reality they refuse to see. paulweston.substack.com/p/the-suicidal…

This is important. We have received a number of concerning reports from local Great Yarmouth residents about Reform campaigners telling blatant untruths about me on the doorstep stating that I am not standing any candidates in the local elections across the Great Yarmouth constituency - this is an outright lie. I am entirely uninterested in what Reform are doing in this election - they have offered absolutely nothing for Great Yarmouth. But I will not tolerate falsehoods that are aimed at damaging our fantastic nine candidates standing for our local party, Great Yarmouth First supported by Restore Britain.

@lyncey_gilbe @Olga03713154 @UKLabour Never let go of nurse for fear of finding something worse.

Starmers bad but that old tart on the world stage!!! @UKLabour a laughing stock

@RupertLowe10 @2tweetaboutit Is he still looking for those weapons of mass destruction that Bush told him where under the bed.

Who trusts Tony Blair? Should he still be having such a significant influence on what's happening in our country? For me, it's a resounding no on both questions.

@AdamsArtist @emeraldthiele It's the same with many of our great institutions eg the National Trust. A fish rots from the head down.

When you think engagement with National Gallery's collection of European Renaissance, Baroque and Romantic art you think Kenyan-born American-based artist making Afro-futurist art "populated by powerful female figures", appointed Contemporary Fellowship. Right? nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/resi…

@infinitehorus @JoshuaHogarth1 @CamillaTominey @DeenBot Heads they win, tales we lose.

@CamillaTominey @DeenBot So? Foreign groups are acting for their own interests in either case.

Exc: London landlords illegally advertise ‘Muslim only’ flat rentals 👇🏻 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/2…

@patcondell @eclectelectric They didndunufin.

There's a reason for this. Can you guess what it is?

Thanks to the Telegraph I learn landlords in London are advertising for Muslim-only tenants on Facebook and Gumtree. It’s illegal. The ads say things like “ for 2 Muslim boys” or “ 2 Muslim girls” or “ Muslims preferred”. The areas covered include Newham, Barking, East Ham, Dagenham, Walthamstow, Redbridge. When the Telegraph called up the landlords And asked if non-Muslims would be considered, one said “ go away” and another said no and put the phone down. Other ads say only Punjabi or Gujarati speaking tenants or people from Kerala. Why Facebook and Gumtree are taking such ads when they are clearly illegal under the 2010 Equality Act is beyond me. Imagine the outcry from Muslims if an ad had said Catholic, Jew or Methodist tenants only.