THFC (Q1 2026 arc)
46.6K posts

THFC (Q1 2026 arc)
@CryptoTHFC
Full-time Crypto / Class of ‘21 / Onchain / Trading
Dexscreener Beigetreten Ocak 2021
1.6K Folgt15.1K Follower

God it would be so fckin funny if they win the CL
UEFA Champions League@ChampionsLeague
Bodø ball 💛 #UCL
English

@itsjustcornbro oh, yeh, I had a total *blast* interacting with those predatory slot machine dapps
TOML
English


@2laxar damn people really out here rugging their mutuals for 300$
its not that bad c'mon
English

@MissionGains when was the last real giga runner? cant even remember
English

@SpursOfficial the board deserves every last thing thats happening right now
the fans dont
English

@abufenyrcd @thecryptomonk i agree but i also think that in 5-10 years max you'll be able to generate a blockbuster feature length film from a few prompts and same with AAA video games
English

@thecryptomonk Unironically I'd be getting good at using stuff like Seedance2 & creating content. Once nobody is working theyl have plenty of time for 'AI Netflix'
English

If i was at uni rn, i would start reconsidering my entire career.
It’s not too late to become a plumber.
Parody Jeff@Parodyjeffx
Anthropic CEO just announced Ai will get rid of 50% of lawyers, consultants, and finance professionals within 12 months.
English

@SpursOfficial absolutely embarrassing defending, we're going down
English

@lech77eth the money i'd be saving using private bot if you guys open API 😭
English


"You're absolutely right! Those were our own troops."
Unicron@0xUnicron
@itsjustcornbro We had to test out ChatGPT on the field real quick
English

@gemchange_ltd @zachxbt tbh this is the most obvious outcome of prediction markets ever
English

The game was never rigged against you
you were never even in the game.
Somewhere between Jane Street's 10am dumps and @ZachXBT investigation about Broox's internal dashboard
If you're reading the news to make your trade, you ARE the trade.
Look at what just happened with Axiom on Polymarket.
predictorxyz
joined Feb 2026
3 predictions total drops ~$66k on "Will Axiom be accused of insider trading?" at 13.8 cents.
Walks away with $477k.
A 625% return on a trade that only makes sense if you already know the answer.
Meanwhile the Polymarket charts tell the whole story before anyone said a word.
Meteora was sitting at 42.5%, Axiom at 17.6% then suddenly Axiom surges to 29.3% while Meteora bleeds down to 26%.
The "prediction" market predicted it because someone inside the prediction already knew.
This is the exact same architecture as Jane Street and IBIT.
Jane Street sits on the pipe between Bitcoin ETFs and actual BTC, uses undisclosed derivatives to mask net exposure, then runs 10am sell programs into thin books.
Broox sits on the pipe between Axiom's user data and the open market, uses internal dashboards to track whale wallets, then front-runs their positions.
Different scale, identical logic - privileged access + information asymmetry + zero disclosure = free money.
The only difference is the number of zeros.
History doesn't even try to hide it anymore.
Nathan Rothschild knew Napoleon lost at Waterloo before the London markets did - sold British bonds to cause panic, bought the bottom, built a dynasty.
That was 1815 and we've learned absolutely nothing since.
The game isn't rigged in some abstract conspiratorial way.
It's rigged in a very specific, structural, boring-if-you-read-the-filings way.

gemchanger@gemchange_ltd
English

"how does azura make money?"
this is a question we have been asked quite a few times over the last few days
the answer is: we don't charge traders directly, and there is a lot of overlooked value that exists throughout the lifecycle of a transaction. even better, we can make money without adversarial fills or similar
some monetization examples:
• rpc kickbacks
• orderflow rebates
• backrunning via on/offchain pool arbitrage
• running our own nodes
though, more importantly, we're going to have to spend a lot of money in order to make a lot of money. these monetization models only work well once we're at massive scale, and we have investors who are happy to support us to reach this scale
this is a strategic, longterm bet that may very well not work out
but, it's a risk we're willing - and happy - to take
because the key difference between us and other teams is that we see a *future* in the work we're doing. we believe that blockchains will, in fact, become the database standard for global finance. we believe that building an end-to-end, multi-asset, multi-network trading platform on these rails may very well be a $100b+ outcome
my blunt and honest take is that the legacy trading terminal teams do not see what we see, and are simply not ambitious enough
a hundred million dollars isn't cool. you know what's cool? a hundred billion dollars
English
















