l
3K posts





.@RupertLowe10 says 250,000 white girls were raped by "primarily Pakistani Muslim men". Here are the official numbers: Casey's national audit (2025): 700 recorded group-based CSE offences in 2023. Police chiefs (NPCC): Pakistani suspects 13.7% of group gangs, white suspects 63%. Run his claim. 700 a year, 13.7% Pakistani, is about 96. Over 25 years, 2,400. The data is under-reported, so I will be generous and multiply it by 10. That's 24,000. And I will double it again to 48,000. Still a fifth of his number, with every assumption stacked in his favour. So either the figure is wrong. Or it is real. And if it is real, it cuts the other way too. White suspects are 63% of group gangs, four and a half times the Pakistani share. On his own number that is more than a million white-gang victims. Lowe says nothing about. And Casey records 500,000 children sexually abused every year in total. The largest group of perpetrators are white men. Either way the headline collapses on its own arithmetic. And more importantly, he appears to be weaponising victims and survivors for political gain. Pathetic.


Rupert Lowe says his report proves "without doubt" the rape gangs are linked to Islam. Here is where that word actually came from. Three things he isn't telling you. One. The "87% Muslim names" figure isn't his inquiry's research. It traces to a 2018 article by Christian Concern — an evangelical advocacy group. Not a research body. Christian Concern co-founded a leadership academy with the Alliance Defending Freedom — a US Christian-right legal group with a budget over $100m a year. Two. The "95%" figure isn't data. It's the personal estimate of one imam — who once campaigned to ban the burka. One opinion. Printed as a finding. Three. The claim that the religion itself is the cause comes from "eight theological factors." That framework was written by Mark Durie — an Anglican priest. Published by Christian Concern a month before Lowe cited it. Durie's field is linguistics. His book argues Islam gives non-Muslims three choices: convert, submit, or the sword. He didn't study the gangs and find Islam. He's argued Islam is a threat for twenty years, then applied it. Strip out the advocacy group, the one imam's guess, and the priest with a fixed thesis. What's left? No mechanism linking the faith to the crime. Only the ethnicity pattern the Government's own audit found locally — and said could not be applied nationally, because the data doesn't exist. His own report admits the scale is "impossible to quantify." Then names a faith of two billion people. Beyond doubt. That isn't a finding. It's an advocacy paper. Broadcast by an MP as proof. Stand with the victims. Question the men profiting from them.




@shift_in2_turbo @JamesTate121 You left wing lunatics keep fighting to fabricate reality, when the reality is that they aren’t silent on anything. They just don’t agree with your views or solutions.


























