DANNY DE HEK

8.4K posts

DANNY DE HEK banner
DANNY DE HEK

DANNY DE HEK

@dehek

NYT Featured Investigative Journalist | OSINT | Cult Survivor | Exposing Scams, Ponzi Schemes & MLMs | I Name & Shame the Bad Actors Behind the Lies

New Zealand Beigetreten Nisan 2009
401 Folgt2.4K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
DANNY DE HEK
DANNY DE HEK@dehek·
Jonathan Mason’s Claims to Goliath Investors — Let’s Talk About Them. Over the past few days I have been reviewing recordings of conversations where Jonathan Mason (Director of MONEY MASE LLC) has been speaking to investors following the criminal charges against Christopher Delgado in the Goliath Ventures case. The recordings reveal a series of extraordinary claims that Mason has been using to reassure investors that everything is fine. Let’s look at some of the statements being made. Mason tells investors that: • He has spoken with “two FBI buddies” and a senior U.S. Marshal who allegedly reviewed the case and told him the charges are “very weak” and “a bunch of BS.” • Tomo Marjanovic, whom he describes as a former law-enforcement officer, is calling investors to reassure them about the situation. • Alston & Bird, which he refers to as “SEC attorneys,” supposedly issued an opinion letter stating that everything related to Goliath was reviewed and approved. • A fidelity bond from RELM Insurance allegedly exists that proves legitimacy. • Former COO Nick Petrillo supposedly has view-only access to six crypto wallets that allegedly contain over $1 billion. • Another individual named “Chad” allegedly has access to four wallets holding roughly $800 million. • According to Mason, these individuals can see the money moving inside the wallets in real time. He also tells investors that the media coverage and investigations are simply exaggerated or misleading. Yet in the very same recordings Mason admits something else that is very revealing: He says he has no answers and no idea what is actually happening. So on one hand investors are told: • Federal agents say the case is weak • Lawyers approved everything • Hundreds of millions of dollars are visible in wallets • The fund will recover But on the other hand Mason admits he doesn’t actually know what is happening. Those two positions cannot both be true. If investors are being told that hundreds of millions of dollars exist in crypto wallets, then the obvious question becomes very simple: Where are those wallets? Because if those wallets truly exist, they would immediately become one of the most important pieces of evidence in the entire investigation. Instead, investors were given stories about insiders having “eyes on the wallets.” Stories are not evidence. An Interesting Coincidence Over the same period these conversations were happening — within the past week — my YouTube videos about Goliath have also been receiving repeated comments from an anonymous account using the name “ViewerListener.” The account has been posting messages attempting to defend Goliath and criticise the reporting around the case. What’s interesting is the timeline. The comments from this anonymous account appeared during the same few days that Jonathan Mason was actively making calls and sending messages to investors attempting to calm concerns. I’m not suggesting anything definitive about who operates the account. But when anonymous accounts suddenly appear defending a collapsing operation at the exact same time promoters are scrambling to reassure investors, it raises obvious questions. Jonathan Mason’s Response After questions began circulating publicly about his role and the statements he made to investors, Jonathan Mason recently sent a message via Signal stating: “All questions can be directed to my attorney Michael Mirer.” We have since contacted legal counsel involved in related litigation to ensure that any information relevant to investors and the case is made available through the appropriate channels. The Bigger Picture What we are seeing now is something that happens repeatedly when large financial schemes collapse. Investors are reassured with explanations like: • the funds are still there • lawyers approved everything • regulators misunderstand the business • the media is exaggerating the situation But reassurance without evidence is not proof. The truth about Goliath Ventures is now being examined where it belongs — in a federal courtroom. And as more information comes forward, the narrative investors were given is starting to unravel. If you invested in Goliath Ventures or were approached by anyone promoting the scheme, please reach out. The more information that comes forward, the harder it becomes for misinformation to continue circulating. #GoliathVenturesInc #GoliathVentures #DannydeHek #ChristopherDelgado #JonathanMason @jonmasonmoney
DANNY DE HEK tweet media
English
1
1
4
2.8K
DANNY DE HEK
DANNY DE HEK@dehek·
What happened after my call with Thaddious Thomas @ThaddiousT raises more questions than answers. Within hours of that conversation, his social media presence started disappearing. Posts removed, content wiped, things quietly taken down. Now ask yourself a simple question—why would someone remove their content if they truly believe in what they’re promoting? If this was a legitimate opportunity, backed by real leadership, real compliance, and real transparency, there would be no reason to hide anything. In fact, you’d expect the opposite—more visibility, more proof, more confidence. Instead, what we’re seeing is damage control. THE POSTS DON’T MATCH REALITY One of the screenshots we’ve recovered shows Thaddious warning people about scams in the past. That’s what makes this even more concerning. At some point, he clearly understood the risks, the patterns, and the warning signs. So what changed? Because the structure he’s defending now follows the exact same playbook: No verifiable CEO No regulatory approval No clear source of external revenue Heavy reliance on recruitment Withdrawal restrictions and fees These aren’t opinions. These are measurable facts. THE DEFLECTION STRATEGY Instead of answering basic questions, he’s chosen to attack credibility, label criticism as “misunderstanding,” and position himself as someone “helping people.” But helping people into a system you cannot explain, verify, or prove is sustainable… is not help. It’s risk transfer. And the people at the bottom of that structure are the ones who pay for it. THE SOCIAL MEDIA WIPE Removing posts doesn’t erase accountability. It highlights it. Because once you realise the questions can’t be answered, the easiest move isn’t transparency—it’s silence. But screenshots don’t disappear. And neither does the responsibility that comes with promoting something that could financially harm others. THE REAL QUESTION This isn’t about personalities. It’s not about who’s right or wrong in an argument. It comes down to one thing: If BG Wealth Sharing is legitimate… why can’t anyone provide proof when asked simple, direct questions? Until that changes, everything else is just noise.
DANNY DE HEK tweet mediaDANNY DE HEK tweet mediaDANNY DE HEK tweet mediaDANNY DE HEK tweet media
English
0
0
2
223
DANNY DE HEK
DANNY DE HEK@dehek·
I’ve now received inside screenshots from within BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange, and what they reveal should concern anyone involved or considering joining. This is not speculation anymore. This is how the system actually works from the inside. THE MONEY FLOW TELLS THE STORY One example shows a $95,642 USDT deposit. Instantly: Referrer paid: $19,128 (20%) New member bonus: $4,782 (~5%) No trading. No profits. No time delay. Just immediate payouts. Ask yourself a very simple question: Where did that $23,000+ come from? Because it didn’t come from trading. It came from the deposit itself. That means the moment someone joins, a huge portion of their money is already gone — redistributed to the people above them. THIS IS RECRUITMENT, NOT TRADING The internal messages are even more revealing. Members are being told: “If you bring in 5 new members… you qualify for monthly dividends and more signal opportunities.” That’s not trading. That’s structured recruitment incentives. Even the so-called “bonuses” people are celebrating: $1,600 bonus $1,992 extra “dynamic signals” “Easter promotions” It’s all tied to bringing in more people. Not market performance. THE ILLUSION OF PROFIT You’ll also see people proudly posting: “I earned $377” “I received $672” These small payouts are deliberate. They build trust. They create belief. They keep people reinvesting and recruiting. Meanwhile, the system is being fed by larger deposits like $20K, $30K, $95K+. That’s where the real money is coming from. THE PSYCHOLOGY TRAP Inside the system, people are already saying: “If this is a scam, it’s the best scam ever.” That’s not proof it’s legitimate. That’s exactly what victims say before the collapse. Because early participants do get paid. Funded by those who come later. THE REAL RISK Right now there is an aggressive push: “Easter promotions” Increased bonuses Pressure to recruit This is how these schemes accelerate before they run into problems. More deposits. Faster growth. Higher exposure. And when it stops? Everyone asks the same question: “How do I get my money back?” FINAL WARNING If a system: Pays instant commissions from deposits Rewards recruitment over trading Locks activity inside controlled chat apps Uses fake personas or “professors” Encourages urgency through promotions Then you are not looking at an investment platform. You are looking at a redistribution scheme. I’m continuing to collect evidence. But based on what I’ve now seen internally — the warning signs are no longer subtle. They are blatant. Proceed accordingly. #BGwealthSharing #BGwealthSharingScam
DANNY DE HEK tweet media
English
2
0
3
662
DANNY DE HEK
DANNY DE HEK@dehek·
I just added a new item to my Shop! A practical, no-nonsense guide to spotting scam red flags, asking the right questions, and protecting your money before or after you invest. ko-fi.com/s/7c4a1f59e6
English
0
0
2
191
Prime Tate
Prime Tate@primetateHQ·
What is the best lesson you’ve learned from the Tate brothers?
Prime Tate tweet media
English
462
33
505
59.1K