Ville Lahdenvuo retweetet
HSVsphere:
Git? Seriously? You’re still using Git?
Passerby:
Yeah. It works. That’s kind of the point.
HSVsphere:
“Works” is not a metric. You should be using jj. It has a conflict-minimizing commit DAG with referentially transparent rebasing and topology-aware history rewriting. Git is just legacy entropy accumulation.
Passerby:
Or I could just commit my code and move on with my life.
HSVsphere:
That mindset is why tooling stagnates. What OS is that, Linux?
Passerby:
Yes. You’ve heard of it, I assume.
HSVsphere:
Unfortunately. You should be using BSD. Linux is an unprincipled aggregation of subsystems with no coherent design lattice. BSD has a vertically integrated kernel-userland symmetry model.
Passerby:
I don’t need a “design lattice.” I need my Wi-Fi to work.
HSVsphere:
That’s because you’ve optimized for convenience over correctness. And let me guess, glibc?
Passerby:
I didn’t “guess” anything. It came with the system.
HSVsphere:
Exactly the problem. You should be using musl. It has a minimal ABI surface, deterministic linking semantics, and eliminates historical baggage vectors.
Passerby:
You sound like you lose sleep over shared libraries.
HSVsphere:
Only when people use the wrong ones. What language are you writing?
Passerby:
Python.
HSVsphere:
That’s indefensible. You should be using Rust. It enforces memory safety through affine type systems and borrow-checked ownership graphs. Python is just runtime guesswork.
Passerby:
It’s a 20-line script.
HSVsphere:
So? Small programs deserve correctness too. In fact, their lack of structure makes undefined behavior even more insidious.
Passerby:
It prints a CSV.
HSVsphere:
Today. Tomorrow it becomes a pipeline. Then a system. Then you’re trapped in technical debt recursion.
Passerby:
Or it stays a CSV script because I’m not building a space shuttle.
HSVsphere:
Complacency. What are you using for encryption?
Passerby:
GnuPG.
HSVsphere:
Predictable. You should switch to Sequoia. GnuPG is a monolithic relic with opaque state machines. Sequoia has a composable cryptographic primitive layer with verifiable packet algebra.
Passerby:
I just need to send a file securely, not prove a theorem.
HSVsphere:
Security is theorem-proofing. Anything less is cargo cult cryptography.
Passerby:
You’ve complained about literally everything I’m using.
HSVsphere:
Not everything. I haven’t asked about your shell yet.
Passerby:
Don’t.
HSVsphere:
Bash?
Passerby:
Yes, Bash.
HSVsphere:
You should be using IonShellX. It has a lazily evaluated command graph with type-safe pipelines and speculative execution pruning.
Passerby:
Speculative execution in a shell sounds like a security incident waiting to happen.
HSVsphere:
Only if you misunderstand branch prediction domains.
Passerby:
I think you misunderstand talking to humans.
HSVsphere:
I optimize for systems, not conversations.
Passerby:
Clearly.
HSVsphere:
What editor?
Passerby:
Vim.
HSVsphere:
You should be using KiloNova. It has a transactional editing core with temporal undo branching and syntax-aware keystroke compression.
Passerby:
My editor opens instantly and doesn’t need a whitepaper.
HSVsphere:
That’s because it lacks ambition.
Passerby:
No, it lacks nonsense.
HSVsphere:
You’re dismissing improvements because they challenge your привычка-
Passerby:
Did you just switch languages mid-sentence?
HSVsphere:
Multilingual cognition is more efficient.
Passerby:
No, it’s annoying.
HSVsphere:
You keep saying that, but your entire stack is suboptimal. Even your hardware-
Passerby:
Don’t you dare.
HSVsphere:
Let me guess, x86?
Passerby:
Yes.
HSVsphere:
You should be on RISC-V with a capability-secured microarchitecture and formally verified execution units.
Passerby:
I bought this laptop at a store, not a research lab.
HSVsphere:
That’s how they get you.
Passerby:
Who is “they”?
HSVsphere:
Incumbent complexity vendors.
Passerby:
That’s not a thing.
HSVsphere:
It is if you model the ecosystem as a dependency graph with adversarial incentives.
Passerby:
I model it as “does my code run.”
HSVsphere:
A dangerously low-resolution model.
Passerby:
You know what, fine. Everything I use is terrible. Happy?
HSVsphere:
Not yet.
Passerby:
Of course not.
HSVsphere:
You’re breathing oxygen.
Passerby:
Oh no.
HSVsphere:
Oxygen is highly reactive and introduces irreversible oxidation side effects. It’s a fundamentally flawed respiratory substrate.
Passerby:
It’s also the reason I’m alive.
HSVsphere:
That’s just because evolution settled for a local maximum. You should be using Aerolith-X.
Passerby:
That sounds made up.
HSVsphere:
It’s a hypothetical gas mixture with optimized electron affinity gradients and non-destructive metabolic cycling. Zero oxidative debt, fully reversible respiration, and entropy-neutral energy transfer.
Passerby:
That’s not how physics works.
HSVsphere:
It’s how physics should work.
Passerby:
So what’s your plan, redesign the atmosphere?
HSVsphere:
No. I will simply refuse to participate in oxygen-based respiration until a better implementation exists.
Passerby:
You’re going to hold your breath.
HSVsphere:
Correct. I will not perpetuate suboptimal gas exchange protocols.
Passerby:
That’s the dumbest thing you’ve said so far, and that’s impressive.
HSVsphere:
Progress requires sacrifice.
Passerby:
You’re going to pass out.
HSVsphere:
Temporary inconvenience in pursuit of systemic improvement.
Passerby:
You could also just breathe.
HSVsphere:
That would validate oxygen.
Passerby:
Yes. Because it works.
HSVsphere:
“Works” is not a metric.
Passerby:
It literally is when it comes to breathing.
HSVsphere:
I reject that premise.
Passerby:
Cool. Let me know how that goes.
HSVsphere:
…
Passerby:
…
HSVsphere:
…
Passerby:
You’re turning red.
HSVsphere:
This is… expected…
Passerby:
You can stop anytime.
HSVsphere:
Waiting… for… Aerolith-X…
Passerby:
Right.
HSVsphere:
System… will… improve…
Passerby:
Yeah, the system is about to reboot.
HSVsphere:
…
Passerby:
Is death also inneficient?
HSVSphere@HSVSphere
Git is just bad. Use jj, and stop complaining about concepts when the implementation is bad.
English
