Felix Heyn-Johnsen

@DavidColeStein @catturd2 @elonmusk So he won’t be twitter-arrested then?

@catturd2 He's a Holocaust denier - @elonmusk has special rules for them. They can literally get away with doing ANYTHING. They're Musk's privileged class.

How can he not be arrested for this?

This is one of those "wacky news stories" that went dark fast. A few days ago a mama bear, who'd birthed two cubs under a house in SoCal, wandered into the shot of a news reporter for local station KTLA. The bear just kind of lumbered around, then left. And everyone was like "Oh that WACKY bear! Wacky wacky bear! The WACKINESS is CRAZY!" And then the mama bear was tranquilized and caught, along with her cubs. And the news anchors were like "I'm sure that WACKY bear will be relocated to the deep forest or a preserve." But no. Animal Control killed it, because it had swiped the leg of a dog-walker who unintentionally ventured too close to the mama bear's lair. And just like that, the wackiness ended. News anchors switched from wacky face to morose face. Seems to me that Animal Control attracts people who really like killing animals. I'm thinking of the cute little squirrel that wore human hats on TikTok, so Animal Control killed it. Or the multiple times Yellowstone Animal Control has euthanized a bison calf because a stupid tourist touched it. Or the time Danish Animal Control killed a giant walrus named "Freya" because it had a habit of sunbathing on shore and creating crowds of onlookers (literally, it was killed because humans were looking at it too much). Has anyone ever studied if Animal Control attracts serial killers who get off on exercising godlike power by taking the life of animals? And maybe nobody makes a fuss over it because it's better that these psychos get their fix via animals than humans? Maybe Animal Control is actually Serial Killer Control, keeping us safe by giving would-be murderers their fill of animal cruelty? Just curious if anyone's ever studied this. ktla.com/news/local-new…

Glorious

Charlie Kirk, in June of 2025, explaining why a massive US war against Iran, and an attempt to facilitate regime change, as pushed by people like Lindsey Graham, is "pathologically insane":

Do we need more diversity in Torture?

Her theory is that turning point USA had went from its original mission of free speech to this intense Zionist agenda. He found some financial irregularities and started looking into it. He also started not wanting to support Israel and was experiencing intense backlash from within. Since one of Erika Kirk’s ex boyfriends works there too, and now that we have seen what happened immediately following his death, it appears that Erika was put in his place after a “hostile takeover.” Erika’s family are a bunch of petty scumbags and Erika has been caught lying about her sexual history. She’s also been caught talking in a sexually inappropriate way to a 9th grader. Turning point USA is a key apparatus to the Israel project and the military industrial complex and Charlie was pulling away from that and about to potentially uncover financial fraud in a “non profit” that isn’t supposed to engage in politics in order to keep its tax exemption. The patsy they claim did it could not have done it with the claimed weapon. The entire investigation was less than 2 days, they destroyed the crime scene, and Erika not only doesn’t want to know who killed her husband but she aggressively rages against anyone looking into it. Means. Motive. Opportunity. The potential conspiracy is obvious but we can’t have concrete evidence without an investigation. Kash Patel aggressively rejects any investagtuon outside of the guy they grabbed immediately. Who couldn’t have done it the way they claim. That is completely reasonable, logical, and anyone who cares about Charlie Kirk would pursue that so he gets justice. The massive backlash Candace is getting and the manipulative “how dare you attack a widow” who is a public figure CEO who is on a book tour is extremely suspicious and has turned the public against Erika Kirk. The gaslighting of “Candace and her cult have destroyed turning point” is pathetic and even more evidence of a conspiracy. Erika Kirk has been a trainwreck and has destroyed her husbands legacy. Aside from money, every other metric has tanked since his death which should have been the opposite. Hope that helps

Renbæk Fængsel er lidt utilfredse med mig For nylig bragte jeg her på profilen et indlæg om, at Renbæk Fængsel sandsynligvis snart vil have mig over på en telefonordning, der de facto fratager mig en vigtig del af mit privatliv. Det sker når (og hvis) jeg efter reglerne her på strafafdelingen flyttes over på den såkaldte “IP-telefon” - en ordning, hvor telefonen hænger på en meget lydt fællesgang, hvor alle afdelingens fanger nemt kan høre, hvad man taler med sine nærmeste pårørende om. Noget som helt utvivlsomt er i strid med både god forvaltningsskik og EMRKs artikler om retten til familieliv. Det svarer til at fængslet gav fangerne adgang til at læse hinandens udadgående post. For at illustrere mit indlæg bragte jeg afdelingens dagsprogram sammen med opslaget - et dokument, der netop beskriver reglerne om IP-telefoni. Det har åbenlyst skabt lidt postyr her i det sønderjyske. I dag da jeg var på vej tilbage fra mine 60 minutter i gårdburet, spurgte en fangevogter mig nemlig om, hvordan det var lykkedes mig at “smugle” dagsprogrammet ud i friheden. Havde jeg haft det i sokkerne? Havde jeg haft held med at delaminere de to A4-sider og sende dem med posten? Han havde efter eget udsagn “haft en del ekstra arbejde“ i den anledning. Jeg kunne dog fortælle ham, at “udsmuglingen” havde en meget uophidsende forklaring. Jeg havde simpelthen bare lagt siderne blandt nogle andre papirer, som blev afleveret til en besøgende. Det er helt normalt for mig - mine besøgende modtager mange officielle dokumenter i forbindelse med min helt lovlige fangejournalisme. Det kan f.eks. være anklageskrifter, afslag på prøveløsladelse, handleplaner og meget andet. I kan se et væld af eksempler her på profilen. Under den obligatoriske nøgenvisitaiton før besøg, havde jeg intet gjort for at skjule de to sider - jeg lagde dem pænt på samme bord som sko, sokker og underbukser lægges på når to fangevogtere undersøger mig for kontrabande. De gad end ikke kigge på lekturen. Pro-tip: opfører man sig ikke-mistænkeligt, bliver man ofte ikke behandlet med mistænksomhed. Til fangevogterens ros udviste han god sportsmanship og gentlemanånd og måtte give mig ret i, at man nogle gange taber og andre gange vinder. No hard feelings. Jeg påpegede også at skaden nok var relativt begrænset, i det jeg jo lige så godt kunne have afsløret den fortrolige time-tabel ved at have lavet en informationsmæssig en-til-en-kopi i hånden og derefter lækket det til omverdenen via DAO. Min besøgende var i øvrigt i fuldstændig god tro og uvidende om, at de to ark blev betragtet som smuglergods. De var bare endnu et par dokumenter i en lang række. Hvordan skal man også fatte mistanke til et par papirer, som jeg kommer gående med i hånden efter to betjente har vendt vrangen ud på mig? Skal Renbæk Fængsel bebrejde nogen, kan de bebrejde sig selv. At lække ret kedelig information om dagligdagen i et dansk fængsel som alle fanger på afdelingen har adgang til bringer mig næppe i liga med Oleg Gordievsky, Kim Philby eller Klaus Fuchs. Ro på, double-oh seven. Situationen omkring mine telefonforhold er i øvrigt stadig uklare (for mig). Jeg håber, at det i al fredsommelighed bliver løst ved at jeg forbliver på den såkaldte advokat-telefon - en trådløs telefon, som jeg kan tale i, mens jeg sidder i cellen. Så slipper vi for at involvere Folketingets Ombudsmand, og jeg kan fortsætte med at ekskludere strafafdelingens fanger i mine intime og private forhold vedrørende mine nærmeste relationer. Mange hemmelige hilsner fra celle 805. Dateret d. 13. februar 2026

Tim Dillon dressed up as Epstein's Temple looking for work 😂😂😂

Industrial agriculture loses 30 billion tons of topsoil annually. At current rates, we have about 60 years of topsoil left globally. Regenerative cattle grazing builds topsoil at rates of 1-2 inches per decade. How? Cattle graze grass, trampling some of it into the ground. Their manure fertilizes the soil naturally. Their hooves break up soil crust, allowing water penetration. The grass roots grow deeper seeking nutrients, pulling carbon from the air and storing it underground. When cattle move to the next pasture, the grass recovers and grows back stronger. This is how the Great Plains of America built 6-8 feet of topsoil over millennia. Bison grazed in massive herds, moved constantly, never overgrazed any area. The grassland thrived. The soil deepened. The ecosystem flourished. Then we killed the bison, plowed the grassland, planted corn, and created the Dust Bowl within 50 years. Millions of tons of topsoil blown away because we replaced regenerative grazing with extractive farming. The solution is obvious: Put the cattle back. Manage them like bison. Rotate them through pastures. Let them build soil while producing food. But this would require admitting that cattle grazing is more sustainable than crop farming. Can't admit that. It undermines the entire "plant-based saves the planet" narrative. So instead we'll keep plowing, keep spraying, keep depleting, and pretend that removing cattle will somehow fix the problem cattle weren't causing. The topsoil will be gone in 60 years. But at least we'll have been morally superior about it.

😂😂😂

A hearty shalom to Karen

The Director of the FBI blackmailed Thomas Massie over the files. I think the smoke has officially reached flame.

Imagine traveling back to 2024 and telling MAGA supporters that Trump would be manically devoted to driving two GOP members out of Congress MTG and Thomas Massie. And that their 2 crimes were: 1) demanding release of the Epstein files and 2) opposing regime-change wars.

Activist: "Every cow adds carbon to the atmosphere." Farmer: "Only if the total number of cows is increasing." Activist: "What?" Farmer: "Stable populations are carbon neutral. Methane breaks down in twelve years back to CO2. Same CO2 the grass absorbed last year." Activist: "But it's still emissions..." Farmer: "It's a cycle. Carbon goes: grass to cow to methane to CO2 to grass. Round and round." Activist: "That's not how it works." Farmer: "That's exactly how the biogenic carbon cycle works." Activist: "I've never heard of that." Farmer: "Because admitting ruminants are climate neutral doesn't sell plant-based products." Activist: "You're making this up." Farmer: "Published research. Look up 'biogenic carbon cycle.' I'll wait."

Activist: "Drinking milk is for baby cows, not humans." Farmer: "Humans have been drinking milk for 10,000 years." Activist: "We're the only species that drinks another species' milk." Farmer: "We're also the only species that cooks food, wears clothes, and builds houses." Activist: "It's unnatural." Farmer: "So are antibiotics. Should we stop using those?" Activist: "That's different." Farmer: "How? Both are things humans do that animals don't." Activist: "Milk is meant for calves." Farmer: "And wheat is meant to reproduce the wheat plant. Yet here we are eating bread." Activist: "Most humans are lactose intolerant." Farmer: "Most humans of European descent aren't. Evolution happened. We adapted." Activist: "It's still weird." Farmer: "Weirder than flying in metal tubes or talking to strangers on screens?"

Læs Min Morsomme Dom Normalt er udskrifter af byretsdomme en fladpandet og ikke særligt opmuntrende affære. Det synes jeg dog i nogen grad at have modvirket i nedenstående materiale, da jeg har forsøgt at indflette et vis satirisk islæt i anklagerens afhøring af mig. Da det nok kun er de allermest entusiastiske antimyndighedsekstremister (I ved, de mennesker, der er imod myndighedernes ekstremisme), der gider læse hele molevitten, anbefaler jeg at læse fra nederst på side 5 til midt på side 10. Jeg har indrammet mine udtalelser med celle B08s allestedsnærværende kuglepen. Der bliver undskyldt, beklaget og krøbet til den store guldmedalje - hvilket giver mig anledning til at meta-more mig over, hvordan rettens skrivekarl har set ud i ansigtet, da hun skulle transskribere det. Som lille, for retsstaten, temmelig illustrativ sidebemærkning skal det nævnes, at dommen først kom mig i hænde 23 dage efter fristen for ankespørgsmålet udløb. Det vil altså sige, at jeg skulle tage stilling til ankespørgsmålet i juridisk blinde - min forsvarer siger, at det er normal procedure for Københavns Byret. Betryggende. Mange oprigtige retsstatshilsner fra Celle B08 Dateret 25. januar 2026

Dolarn reaching new heights of lying.

So now he’s attacking my wife who voted for him three times. Maybe someone told him she’s actually the one who suggested I ask Pam Bondi in person at a dinner when we would get Phase 2 of the Epstein files. Bondi said there were no more files. As they say, the rest is history.

Hey @dbongino now that the files are out can you share with us the part that proved Epstein killed himself? You said you saw the files and knew for a fact he killed himself. Surely, you weren’t lying through your fucking teeth.