Angehefteter Tweet
James Ray
1.9K posts
James Ray
@frameworkguru
Public notes doc. Dodging algorithmic relevance as best I can. Book: Framework BlogBook Substack: Obligate Brahmin
Austin, TX Beigetreten Ağustos 2024
104 Folgt63 Follower
@RexDouglass An institution that set out to teach people how to be scientists and was funded as such wouldn't have an issue; the issue is that universities follow a "learn by doing" model that produces either fake learning or fake doing.
His Alice and Bob example hinged on a fake toy problem!
English
@RexDouglass Yeah, the fact that he frames the problem as "this will gut our institutions" and not "how can we use these tools to achieve the intended result" underscores how farcical the institutions are. It's only a problem because they claim to make science but instead make scientists.
English
I think this gets directly at the real question - what is the point of science as an institution today? Arguably society at large wants it to be "making science" while the institution wants it to be "making scientists." And how well things are going can be tied to which you want.
Joshua Gans@joshgans
This is an interesting discussion of AI's impact on science. ergosphere.blog/posts/the-mach…
English
@panickssery There's been a huge amount of progress on all of these points, what are you talking about.
English
asked Claude for key moral questions discussed by the ancient greeks and it said they tried to define
- the good life
- justice
- objective vs relative morality
- the individual–community relationship
- how to face suffering/death
not much convergence since (much less progress)
English
@jasonbowden1000 @Wormsworth__ I was gonna say, it's pretty central to Christianity that God has personhood. The alternative view is way farther from our cultural priors.
English
@Wormsworth__ Hegel would agree with your professor. A holist, he believed there are no islands of reality. So if we are free, have rational self-knowledge, and are capable of integral self-expression, then we can supposedly reverse-engineer or reconstruct reality to explain these facts.
English
Perfect illustration of how moral sublimation renders evo-psych incoherent. Sperm donation is an abstract social transaction and therefore not subject to the conditioning instilled by evolution.
Shylock Holmes@shylockh
The lack of interest in sperm donation is a truly bizarre mistake from an evolutionary perspective. Genetic million dollar briefcases of cash sitting on the sidewalk, and almost no men pick them up because "it's weird" or "it might lead to an awkward conversation in 20 years".
English
@kendrictonn @SpencrGreenberg Agreed, the loose orb on the bottom right is suspicious. 2 we can discount because an AI would think that pineapple was "wrong", bottom left because of the fly (if prompted in manually, it would have been made more central to the composition). 1 I'm not sure on.
English
@SpencrGreenberg For what it's worth, and it's probably worth something, I do not recognize any of these pieces, and am most suspicious of 1 and 4, top left and bottom right, being AI. I guess it's a professional opinion, but I am not confident in it
English
Can you tell which of these four fruit still lifes were made by AI and which were made by a 19th-century painter? At least one was painted by a human, and at least one was made by an AI. Place your guesses in the 4 surveys below:
English
@Flexperte @SpencrGreenberg Why are you vociferously arguing against something no one present has claimed?
English
@SpencrGreenberg That’s why I put it in apostrophes: kind of, in essence human originated.
I claim: these results would not be possible without the original! human painted still lives as training data (my § 2), thus I stand by my observation.
Don’t you actually agree?
Let’s put it to test!
English
Coneheaded inbred snow ape has never opened a Faulkner book. Genuine troglodyte. HE WROTE FOR MOVIES YOU FUCKING SUBHUMAN SWINE.
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸@pmarca
In our cultural memory, 1866-1928 might as well not even exist. Lost decades, despite virtually the entire modern world as we know it conceived and built then.
English
@RolfHaltza @neo1807 How long has it been since you've played a videogame?
English
Every contemporary video game is just work now.
Every game is either Minecraft, where gameplay is replaced by tools and crafting, or Fortnite, where you are meant to endlessly grind for hours without any real purpose.
The Total Work System where even play is work.
Pokémon Daily Post💫@PokeDailyPost
A Japanese Pokémon Pokopia player built a giant shopping mall 😱🏬
English
@ErikThurman @NapoleonThyCat @akoustov Do you have any evidence whatsoever that Kustov has shared a single journal article with a single fake source?
English
@NapoleonThyCat @akoustov A professor knows the effects of cognitive offloading does to a student. They are aware every time they use AI to publish a journal with fake sources, it creates more time and effort for everyone to verify if the work is true (which is why I said nobody should read his work).
English
Across academia, journalism, and the arts, I don't think we've ever seen a moment in contemporary history where people so openly discredit themselves willingfully in public.
English
@unisoccon @aryehazan The purpose of the shrimp hypothetical is to get people to answer "does human consciousness have some transcendental ultimate value that animals don't". You obviously disagree; I agree with you. But I don't discount the alternative sufficiently to dismiss the question.
English
@frameworkguru @aryehazan I disagree. The purpose of the hypothetical is to grandstand narrow tribalistic values.
English
you are not a serious person if you disagree that some number of shrimp outweighs a human (in value, not mass)
Fourth Position@unisoccon
@aryehazan @yhdistyminen Googol shrimp > 1 human You are not a serious person if you disagree, because any reality in which this is a dilemma would minimally cause horrific outcomes for everything involved, because you can't have a googol of something like a shrimp without it being important
English
@unisoccon @aryehazan I can't tell who's agreeing or disagreeing with who; I was taking Aryeh's statement at face value and arguing against that. I don't object to your statement about unintended consequences but I do think it defeats the purpose of the hypothetical
English
@zenahitz Synthetic (pidgin Kant) subjects require you to apply learned principles in succession, analytic subjects require you to generalize from whatever you do know. The former has a lot of failure points, the latter has none. Doesn't mean STEM education is bad.
English
This is obviously true, and suggests that STEM general education is doing very poorly.
Voice of Yogi Berra AM/FM/HD/AGI/PhD@RLangford18
@zenahitz Hypothesis: Percentage of STEM students with at least an amateur level understanding of liberal arts is much higher than percentage of liberal arts students with amateur level understanding of STEM? How do we test it?
English
Petrarch kicks off the Renaissance and we get a flood of geniuses inventing things- it's not like he brought it about with gene-editing. It was a question of social technology. The same brains writing hymnals in monasteries in 760AD had productive work to do in the 1400s.
English
If the thing we call intelligence is a measure of "problem solving speed" rather than "problem solving capability", we should expect it to largely wash out in the course of history at the macro-level, because familiarity with your own problems approximates higher intelligence.
English
@jmbollenbacher I understand the statements but I'd like to read the argument
English
Apparently Chollet thinks intelligences has an upper bound, and that humans are somewhat close to it.
Totally delusional, tbh. Human supremacy is such a crazy drug.
Give up human supremacism. It's not factually or morally tenable; it will only confuse and harm you and others.
François Chollet@fchollet
One of the biggest misconceptions people have about intelligence is seeing it as some kind of unbounded scalar stat, like height. "Future AI will have 10,000 IQ", that sort of thing. Intelligence is a conversion ratio, with an optimality bound. Increasing intelligence is not so much like "making the tower taller", it's more like "making the ball rounder". At some point it's already pretty damn spherical and any improvement is marginal. Now of course smart humans aren't quite at the optimal bound yet on an individual level, and machines will have many advantages besides intelligence -- mostly the removal of biological bottlenecks: greater processing speed, unlimited working memory, unlimited memory with perfect recall... but these are mostly things humans can also access through externalized cognitive tools.
English
@RuxandraTeslo The culture of Rationalism is designed around this. Fierce skepticism about the qualitative, hapless dogmatism about the quantitative. The trouble is how often they mistake the former for the latter!
But I don't think it's IQ, I think it's autism.
English
Above the "studies shows" upper midwit in intelligence, but equally mind-diseased is another phenotype: the open-minded, hyper-rational guy who sees their inability to appreciate things that are non-quantifiable and belong to the spiritual as a sign of intellectual superiority.
English
-"Puzzle games" usually aren't actually very complex, in the sense of a lot of moving parts; rather, their parts fit together weirdly. Really complex puzzles (Fez, Animal Well) are basically designed as ARGs- so, wikislop. The Witness is the upper bound for non WS puzzles imo
English