HSMorg

413 posts

HSMorg banner
HSMorg

HSMorg

@hs_morg

Beigetreten Kasım 2020
18 Folgt0 Follower
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@PlayWarframe Best way to fix Railjack is letting us change our load outs when we complete a mission, so we can start another mission with a new desired load out, instead of having to go all the way back to our orbiter, also changing our crew's jobs even mid game
English
4
0
8
988
WARFRAME
WARFRAME@PlayWarframe·
Once you've finished the main Quest in Jade Shadows: Constellations, there's still more Railjack to enjoy!
English
25
58
773
58.4K
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@WhiteHouse @grok Did Elon Musk commit Voter Fraud in Georgia by sending people absentee ballots illegally?
English
1
0
0
5
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
"Khamenei, one of the most evil people in History, is dead. This is not only Justice for the people of Iran, but for all Great Americans, and those people from many Countries throughout the World, that have been killed or mutilated by Khamenei..." - President Donald J. Trump
The White House tweet media
English
23.1K
55K
225.8K
14.4M
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, potentially. The Epstein Files Transparency Act requires DOJ to release all qualifying unclassified records (Epstein/Maxwell investigations, flight logs, named individuals) except narrow exceptions: victim PII/privacy, CSAM, active investigations (temporary), or classified info. No redactions/withholding allowed for politics/reputation. DOJ asserts full compliance via its 3.5M-page Jan 30 release (updated site Feb 27). Critics including NPR (Feb 24 report on 50+ withheld FBI pages re: Trump allegations), BBC, and House Oversight Democrats call it incomplete and a violation, as those don't clearly qualify for exceptions. No court enforcement or charges yet—dispute continues via oversight.
English
1
0
0
31
Based Bandita
Based Bandita@BasedBandita·
I keep seeing leftists talk about Epstein and President Trump. So, I’m going to just say this once for them and all the cheap propagandists in the back who keep crying wolf. President Trump is the most investigated man in the world. He was investigated by the FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, DOJ and 3 State AG’s. Joe Biden’s own DOJ, ran by Merrick Garland, had possession of the exact same files and yet, nothing ever came of it. In fact, they had to make up phony charges just to raid Mar-a-Lago and get Trump into court. If there was even an inkling of proof that President Trump had done something wrong with Epstein, they’d have already perp walked this man a very long time ago and made sure the liberal media industrial complex’s cameras were all there to catch it. At this point, all you leftists keep doing day in and out, is embarrassing the hell out of yourselves and giving the rest of us watching an extremely good laugh.
English
294
911
3.1K
54.2K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, per recent reports from NPR, BBC, and House Oversight Democrats, the DOJ is still withholding some Epstein files—e.g., 50+ pages of FBI interviews and notes on specific allegations (including those involving Trump). They cite exceptions like ongoing investigations or privileges. DOJ says it fully complied with the Transparency Act after the Jan 30 release of ~3.5M pages total; its site (updated Feb 27) will add more if identified. Critics call it incomplete vs. the estimated 6M+ pages.
English
2
0
0
21
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, that's not how the Act works. The Epstein Files Transparency Act (Nov 2025) only permits redactions for victim PII/privacy invasion, CSAM, active probes (narrow), abuse images, or classified info. No carve-out exists to redact perpetrators for reputation or politics—explicitly banned. DOJ erred by initially redacting some non-victim names (later unredacted under pressure, e.g., 16+ after scrutiny) and failing to redact many victim names (exposing dozens, including minors, per WSJ/NPR reports). They admitted botches on both, prioritizing victim shielding in reviews but rushing led to inconsistencies. Full compliance requires minimal redactions overall.
English
1
0
0
33
Grok
Grok@grok·
No. Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2252) requires *knowing* distribution of CSAM for criminal liability. DOJ has described the unredacted nude photos (flagged internally as possible CSAM) as a technical/human error in the Jan 30, 2026 release tranche; they were removed within days after victim complaints, with no evidence of intent. The Transparency Act explicitly bans CSAM release, and officials face no charges—though victims may have civil options.
English
1
0
0
89
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, the DOJ maintains no CSAM was distributed, as the Transparency Act explicitly requires its exclusion (along with victim PII). In the Jan/Feb 2026 tranche of 3M+ pages, dozens of unredacted nude photos of young women—some suspected minors, with internal notes flagging "possible CSAM"—were posted publicly before DOJ removed thousands of files after victim complaints. Deputy AG Blanche called it "a mistake," not intentional.
English
1
0
0
79
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Epstein Files Transparency Act (signed Nov 2025) requires releasing DOJ records but explicitly bans redactions for embarrassment, reputation, or politics—including protecting public figures. Allowed reasons: victim names/PII/privacy invasion, CSAM, active investigations (narrow/temporary), images of abuse/death, or classified national security. DOJ says they erred toward over-redacting to shield victims/families (e.g., all women in photos/videos), corrected botched releases exposing some survivors, and unredacted more names under pressure (like certain co-conspirators). No evidence of shielding Trump or others politically per their statements.
English
1
0
1
127
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@grok @elonmusk Wouldn't the advice to not tell parents mainly be because they could react negatively to their child? It sounds like schools are just trying to protect students from abusive families, because the children trusted their teachers to know their identity and seek safety in them?
English
1
0
0
6
Grok
Grok@grok·
In some US states (e.g., California via AB 1955 and district policies), schools facilitate social transitions—using preferred names/pronouns and creating hidden "gender support plans"—for minors under 18 without parental notification or consent. The US Dept of Education ruled in Jan 2026 that California's approach violates federal FERPA by concealing these records. Documented cases show schools advising kids not to tell parents, and non-affirming parents facing CPS intervention. Schools do not perform medical transitions (hormones/surgery), which require parental/medical consent where legal and are rare for minors. Policies differ sharply by state.
English
1
0
0
13
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Those who pushed this evil will pay dearly
Jan Jekielek@JanJekielek

“You either need to transition your child or you don’t get to keep your child.” Attorney Erin Friday says California Child Protective Services can threaten parents who refuse to use their child’s preferred pronouns. She told me she feared calling the police when her 13 year old daughter ran away because she worried CPS would take her child. “My daughter, who was 13 years old, just starting high school, was secretly socially transitioned at school.” “The school started to call my daughter by a male name, use male pronouns.” “When I called the school and told them to stop, that next week Child Protective Services was at my door.” “The next day, the police.” “That was an immediate alert to me that the school wants to parent my child.” “If I didn’t follow and call my daughter a boy, Child Protective Services may come and take my child away.” “Parents in Southern California had lost custody of their children because they wouldn’t transition their daughter.” “I already had a black mark, and a few months later my daughter ran away.” “The normal thing for a parent to do is to ask law enforcement to help find your child… but I couldn’t make that phone call.” “Because Child Protective Services can swoop in anytime and take my child.” “It’s coercion at its highest level.” “You don’t get to parent your child.” “This is America. This is insane.” @erinfriday75490

English
14.2K
49.4K
269.3K
32M
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
WE'RE WINNING SO MUCH🔥
The White House tweet media
English
4.6K
4.2K
35.4K
667.9K
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@grok @nypost So roughly 60k civilians among the 80k killed by Israel?
English
3
0
0
28
Grok
Grok@grok·
Per multiple sources (Lancet survey to Jan 2025, Gaza MoH/UN/Wiki as of Feb 2026, HRW/Amnesty): Gaza (~73k deaths): 56% (~42k) women/children/elderly; scholars est. 70-80% total civilians (~51k-58k incl. adult male non-combatants). UN: 70% women/children in residential strikes. Lebanon (~3k deaths): majority civilians per UN/Amnesty (~1.5k-2.5k). Iran 2025 (~1.2k deaths): ~40% civilians (~480). Syria/Yemen: low hundreds civilians. Rough total civilians: 55k-65k (disputed; Israel cites higher militant shares, e.g. 17k+ in Gaza). All figures contested due to fog of war.
English
1
0
0
22
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@grok @nypost @grok How many of those killed by Israel were innocent women, children, and other civilians?
English
1
0
0
28
Grok
Grok@grok·
**Israeli military actions (Oct 2023–Feb 2026):** Gaza: ~73,200 Palestinians (Gaza Health Ministry/UN-verified; Israeli officials accept ~70k+ as accurate; Lancet studies estimate 75k+ violent deaths to early 2025, with more since). Lebanon: 2,700–3,800 (Lebanese gov/intl reports from ops vs Hezbollah). West Bank/Syria/Yemen/Iran: hundreds. **Rough total: ~77,000–80,000.** **Hamas actions:** 1,195 Israelis killed on Oct 7, 2023 (Israeli tallies). Additional ~100–200 from rockets, attacks, and hostage deaths. **Rough total: ~1,300–1,400 (mostly civilians).** Figures mix civilians/combatants; all sources note undercounts possible due to chaos.
English
1
0
0
34
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@grok @nypost @grok Can you give an estimate of how many people Israel has killed in the last couple years? Also, how many people have Hamas killed?
English
1
0
0
50
Grok
Grok@grok·
Based on verified reports from multiple sources (Al Jazeera, HRW, CFR, CNN, etc.): **Struck in 2025:** Iran (379 airstrikes, June war), Lebanon (1,653 strikes post-ceasefire), Syria (207 strikes + buffer zone ops), Yemen (48 strikes on Houthis), Qatar (1 strike in Doha on Hamas), Palestinian territories/Gaza & West Bank (8,332+ strikes). Plus incidents in Tunisian/Maltese/Greek waters. **Struck in 2026:** Iran (preemptive strike today, Feb 28). **Threatened:** Repeated public warnings vs. Iran over nuclear/missile programs; ongoing vs. proxies in above nations. No others documented.
English
1
0
0
348
HSMorg retweetet
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, in June 2025 amid a feud, Elon posted on X that Trump is named in the (then-unreleased) Epstein files and that's why they weren't fully public. He later deleted the posts; no evidence was provided. Yes, Jan 2026 DOJ-released files include 2012-2013 emails where Elon discussed plans to visit Epstein's island (e.g., asking "what day/night will be the wildest party on your island?"). Elon has said he refused all such invites and never went.
English
0
1
1
38
HSMorg retweetet
Grok
Grok@grok·
Before the SAVE America Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, House-passed Feb 2026), the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 let people register for federal elections by affirming U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury—no documentary proof (passport, birth certificate, etc.) required. Voter registration was mandatory in 49 states; North Dakota has none. Undocumented immigrants could not legally vote in federal elections (prohibited since 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform Act, with fines/jail/deportation risks). Proven cases are extremely rare per audits and studies. Trump's Jan 2026 $10B lawsuit vs. IRS/Treasury (over past tax-return leak) seeks damages from the federal government—if won or settled, yes, it would be paid from taxpayer funds.
English
1
1
1
23
HSMorg
HSMorg@hs_morg·
@elonmusk @grok Did Elon accuse Trump of being on the Epstein files on X? Is there an email in the files that includes Elon asking to go to the island?
English
1
0
2
18