HoratioNelson

@danamalt @DaveTrue84 50 years plus - it doesn’t get easier!

@danamalt @annabf123 I was with a Geordie in Chester yesterday…. He called it …. One shot on goal from Pompey then the killer in added time. I hoped it wouldn’t be that way….. but it was. Agree totally on your take about response. Comical!

@danamalt I think on current form we will still only make up the numbers in the play offs ….. I hope I’m wrong

Perfect.

@wallsendredicko @Boro @GraemeBandeira @smoggie1976 @TypicalBoroPod How did it all go so wrong?

Come on then @Boro fans let’s have your questions for @GraemeBandeira and @smoggie1976 for today’s @TypicalBoroPod………🫣 #UTB🔴⚪️👓

Nothing says Britain like this….. Chester Cathedral….

@paulmasonnews Lies.

One of the clearest statement of Labour principle

@Ryanmariebach78 Reach out

What's a common phrase that annoys you? "To be clear"

@UKLabour Channel emergency??? You have done nothing.

Labour is taking the tough decisions to ensure security and stability for Britain.

In a crowded field, Bridget Phillipson is the most useless Cabinet minister. mol.im/a/15478603

@KayBurley @bbclaurak @vicderbyshire You overlook his failures in the English Channel.

No fan of Starmer but he continues to hold his nerve and carry out the supreme duty as PM - to keep his citizens safe from harm. @bbclaurak @vicderbyshire

The Chagos deal is dead and good riddance. It was a strategic blunder from the start by this Labour government and a disaster waiting to happen. Many of us warned the government but they simply refused to listen, now they will have to make another humiliating U-turn. telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/… Perhaps those close to the government who made very tidy sums promoting this disastrous deal might now consider donating some of those earnings to the Chagossian people whose interests were so often overlooked in the process.

@Edwina_Currie Oh dear Edwina

Eh? There are no mountains in Lincolnshire … 👇👇👇😮😮😮🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

Ambition Before Duty. The Minister Who Put Her Career Ahead of the Law. Next Wednesday marks one year since the Supreme Court ruled, unanimously and without ambiguity, that sex under the Equality Act means biological sex. One year since the law was settled. One year since the Equality and Human Rights Commission drafted its code of practice setting out what that ruling requires of hospitals, schools, gyms and public bodies. One year since Bridget Phillipson received that code and chose to sit on it. What has changed in twelve months is not the law. The judgment stands. The code is ready. What has changed is the credibility of the minister charged with implementing it. Baroness Falkner, who led the EHRC until November and oversaw the drafting of that code, has now said plainly what many had suspected: Phillipson is withholding guidance not because it requires further work, but because publishing it would cost her politically. The activist MPs whose votes she needs for promotion would not forgive her. So women wait, and the minister keeps her powder dry (Martin, 2026). That is a specific accusation, made by a specific person with direct knowledge of the process. It is not a political opponent guessing at motive. Falkner submitted the code. She watched it stall. She knows what ready looks like, and she knows the guidance is ready. Her conclusion, that personal ambition is the operative factor, carries weight that no government spokesman can easily dismiss. The Labour response, that Falkner had demeaned the office she once held, did not address the substance. It attacked the witness. Which leaves the charge unanswered. Consider what the title Secretary of State for Women and Equalities actually represents. Not a departmental portfolio in the ordinary sense, but a stated commitment, a promise woven into the office itself. To hold that title while deliberately withholding the legal protections owed to the women you nominally represent is a contradiction so stark it requires no elaboration. The office makes the accusation. Falkner supplies the motive. The anniversary provides the measure. Falkner went further still, and her wider observation deserves to be heard. She drew a parallel with the grooming gangs scandal, noting that this government has a pattern of institutional inaction driven by fear of upsetting particular constituencies. The comparison is uncomfortable precisely because it is not new. The structure is familiar: a known problem, a clear remedy, a minister unwilling to act because the political cost of action outweighs, in their private calculation, the human cost of delay. Those doing the waiting are never the ministers. Starmer's position is untenable on its own terms. He told Parliament the ruling must be implemented in full. His minister is arguing for a case-by-case approach that restores the incoherence the court rejected. He is a lawyer. He knows what a unanimous Supreme Court judgment means. He also knows what his backbenchers want. The gap between those two things is where women's rights currently reside. The government's rebuttal speaks of sober leadership and treating everyone with dignity. Fine words. But dignity is not delivered by a code of practice that lives in a ministerial drawer. Protection is not real if it exists only in statute while the guidance that would make it operational is suppressed for career reasons. The court has done its work. The EHRC has done its work. One minister has not done hers. "Phillipson is withholding guidance not because it requires further work, but because publishing it would cost her politically."

@sarahfinn8 Speechless

Goodness me , it’s rough being a Boro fan sometimes. 😢💔

@Boro_Breakdown Season capitulation….

Wow… give us your takeout.

@HedgeTweets_ I agree …. Comical …. Ah well .. there’s always next season.

Absolutely comical us 🤣 you have to laugh or you’ll cry !!

Well @Boro - I have no words …..

@jumpsa4 Can’t believe I’ve never been before

@iISeeNoSignals My family don’t live to far away. Used to go a lot when I was a kid.

Chester - I am quietly impressed! Quite a high street too….

@TBrit90 @littonlad1 Boat …. Not sub

The world record, achieved on the previous patrol was 204 days (6.7 months), we are now at 198 days (6.5 months) and the replacement sub is yet to depart. The timeline suggests the current one will be a few days off 7 months when it returns.