Angehefteter Tweet
farò un film un giorno su qualcuno triste che esce a fare un giro e durante il giro non succede nulla e quando rincasa è tutto come prima
Italiano
una vodka riccia
7.4K posts
una vodka riccia
@introcque
contemplazione eremitaggio e sachertorte
London Beigetreten Mayıs 2011
207 Folgt785 Follower
una vodka riccia retweetet
Really dire stuff. We are hurtling towards a world where many human beings stop talking to each other.
Humans consistently choose convenient, low-friction, low-effort experiences, when faced with choices in how to expend our time and effort and resources. What’s easier? Navigating a relationship with another person with their own needs and perspectives? Or an AI designed to give you exactly what you want, on demand? Human reciprocity is often hard; AI is easy. Many, many people will choose AI over human interaction, more and more often, as it gets better at simulating the things we want from human interaction. Because it will provide those things without friction, or pushback, and it’ll give it to us immediately.
No amount of saying “AI is slop, AI isn’t intelligent, AI isn’t conscious!” will prevent this. You will not be able to build a social stigma strong enough to stop this! Especially because stigma only works when people *want* your approval—or at least to avoid your opprobrium—*which itself depends on them caring about their social relations to other human beings!
This is the heart of it! Taboo, disdain, ostracism, social pressure—these things all hinge on people *wanting to avoid the disapproval of a human community to which they belong*, but AI offers *exit from human community altogether*. You can’t use tools of behavioral incentives that *depend on community membership* to *stop people from leaving a community*! Ostracism can’t prevent people from self-ostracizing! That should be very, very obvious!
The only solution to prevent this requires some kind of collective action, presumably mediated through the state. That’s it. That’s the only choice if this alarms you.
hope hopes hoping@hopes_revenge
>Personal, non-work conversations are ~60% of usage. ai companionship remains underdiscussed as potentially the most transformative aspect of large scale ai adoption
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
This article gets at one of the really troubling aspects of generative AI: the way it’s driving a breakdown in trust. Whether it’s writing or images, it’s becoming harder to trust the things you see and the people around you. It puts everyone on edge and on the defensive.
New York Magazine@NYMag
When Jared Hewitt’s co-worker claimed last winter that Hewitt used AI to write an incident report for the day care they work at. The co-worker pointed to the words ‘juxtaposition’ and ‘circumstantial’ as evidence of a machine-generated influence. “I don’t write in a casual way but a much more serious, precise way,” he says. “And I’ve paid the price for living in a ChatGPT society.” It wasn’t the first time Hewitt’s prose has been pegged as AI, and he thinks he knows why. He has a stutter, and when he’s typing, he can speak uninterrupted. It is a luxury he takes full advantage of. Hewitt is also neurodivergent. “Growing up, I had a strong obsession with writing,” he says. He was always given good grades in English, but now, with the massive uptick in AI-generated text, all the time he spent happily working to improve his prose strikes him as a liability. There’s a new entity among us, and it’s getting better at disguising itself. The mood is paranoid: This presence is producing a gigantic amount of language, much of it filtered through people we know, whether they’re using it for Hinge messages or LinkedIn posts. The effect is that everyone is trying to figure out who is LLM and who is human. Sometimes, we are getting it wrong. “People are going off vibes,” says the historical novelist Kerry Chaput, who was horrified when a reader thought a social-media post she wrote about her neurogenic cough was ChatGPT generated. Emma Alpern reports on the people — often non-native English speakers and autistic writers — being falsely accused of using LLMs to write: nymag.visitlink.me/kzDs4g
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
una vodka riccia retweetet
una vodka riccia retweetet
Writers should not publish for free. They should not publish at all. The only acceptable form of publication for a true writer is posthumous, ideally against their own express wishes
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
I feel like people are wholly missing the point of why this NYT thing is a bad gotcha: it presupposes literary style is most readily appreciated in excerpts, what AI can't produce is an entire work of human ingenuity, it can most certainly emulate a thin gossamer of style.
rob@RobertSecundus
jesus christ. it's so over. AI slop (that consistently replicates all over AI's most annoying prose tendencies) preferred over McCarthy, Le Guin, Sagan, Elizabeth Bishop. The average times-reader is subliterate.
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
@thetolerantweft girl! scaring me like that.
love your work x
English
this was the original Italian brainrot but y’all aren’t ready for that conversation
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
Fundamentally, he’s just not likable! And I’m so happy that this particular personality trait is affecting a man’s reputation for once, since it so disproportionately weighs on the careers of actresses and other female artists.
Seth Abramovitch@SethAbramovitch
Ok I did not hear this. This sucks
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
finally saw that new audience disclaimer at the Prince Charles Cinema. you all undersold how pointed it is. “meet the film at its level, not above it”. ouch! but glad they’re not mincing words anymore.
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
una vodka riccia retweetet
Reading does feel like this and this is why I love reading books
star/lumi/gwynn ☆@starscythe
this gif is frying my brain
English
una vodka riccia retweetet
Quite possibly the coolest image that could ever possibly exist
English
michele bravi pensavo fosse una bellissima donna trans. invece è michele bravi #sanremo2026
Italiano
un'altra considerazione importante re Sanremo: la manina/il braccino non richiesto è riservata esclusivamente a donne e disabili #noted #sanremo2026
Italiano
conti è un repellente, uno sgraziato, un urticante. mai visto nessuno così determinato ad appiattire ogni momento, ogni minuscolo spunto comico o umano. un incubo, che NOIA #sanremo2026
Italiano
senti patti. chiaramente non sei viva, nel senso, questa performance arriva diretta dall'ade e la trovo una cosa bellissima e necessaria. mi spiego #sanremo2026
Italiano