Disc Order Space Toaster

@WoehlBill @GiovanniSagredo @AshtonForbes You’re an idiot.

@GiovanniSagredo @AshtonForbes x.com/i/status/20534…

According to Pharis Williams, torque is what connects electromagnetic fields to the 5th dimension. By applying synchronized torque, they're pumping angular momentum into a scalar potential. They create a plasma bubble that displaces the plane from spacetime, causing it to tunnel to the destination.

@DisculpemeCock @invertedworld9 Spoken like a true flat brained retard 😂🤣

@jacuzzi_toaster @invertedworld9 only a dumbass would think that 🤡

Nonsensical pseudoscience.

@DisculpemeCock @invertedworld9 You don’t need nasa to know the earth is a sphere, dip shit 😂🖕

@jacuzzi_toaster @invertedworld9 🖕

@DisculpemeCock @_free_f0rever_ @benwehrman Your argument from ignorance does absolutely nothing, dip shit 😂🤣 You continue to misunderstand physical obstruction and angular resolution, that’s all your entire post is.

@jacuzzi_toaster @_free_f0rever_ @benwehrman 🖕

How Light Refraction Works at Long Distances (There Is No Curve)

@_free_f0rever_ @DisculpemeCock @benwehrman Your pseudoscientific slop and absolute gullibility in accepting it doesn’t change reality. Angular size doesn’t explain ships disappearing hull first, that’s just flatard cope.

@DisculpemeCock @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman They have to pretend to not understand how we see. Otherwise, their little sci-fi fantasy evaporates.

@Dugi144 @benwehrman Obviously the state of the air isn’t always the same, dumbass.

@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Yeah, light does bend. But how much it bends depends on the medium through which it travels, in this case, through air. And the state of air isn't always the same, moron. No matter how much it bends, it doesn't make you see what's behind physical curvature.

"If sunsets are just the sun leaving our perspective on a flat plane...then how come it doesn't noticeably shrink down in size as it disappears over the horizon?" Short answer: The water vapor in the atmosphere creates a magnification effect. ATMOSPHERIC LENSING explained 👇

@Dugi144 @benwehrman That’s patently false. More refraction = seeing further.

@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman The more water vapor in the air = the more refraction = the less visibility, moron. No refraction/minimal refraction = you can see the furthest. youtube.com/watch?v=q9rnfp…

@Dugi144 @benwehrman Keep being a reality denying flatard, doesn’t change anything.

@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman you say that because you exist in an upside-down cosmos, mate. In real reality, the things are exactly opposite, where refraction can't make you see objects behind a physical barrier, that curvature of your imaginary ball earth is.

@invertedworld9 The issue with your statement is that the math behind the “model” is all from our spherical earth. Shame’s flatard model quite literally assumes the earth is a sphere 🤡😂🤣 But you gullible retards don’t care to actually research anything that your flat brain priests give you.

Without a single assumption about size or distance.

@BuzzedEdwin @Maximum2893 @stats_feed I just told you how you can measure it, lying dumbass 🤡

@jacuzzi_toaster @Maximum2893 @stats_feed lol so you can’t. measuring objects moving isn’t measuring gravity. It simply measuring the movement of objects. No gravity required

Do you believe the Earth is a sphere?

@BuzzedEdwin @Maximum2893 @stats_feed You can use a gravimeter to measure the local gravitational acceleration.

@jacuzzi_toaster @Maximum2893 @stats_feed What Tool do you measure gravity with? how do you grab gravity to measure it?

@StephaneGu53588 @Weihnachtskeks2 @BrockRiddickIFB If you use empirical measurements, you can prove that the earth is a spheroid.

@jacuzzi_toaster @Weihnachtskeks2 @BrockRiddickIFB Disc order is right, if you use his fake science everything prove the globe.

Gravity?

@BuzzedEdwin @Maximum2893 @stats_feed You can measure it, you lying about it won’t change it. 🥱 Thanks for continuing to prove you are nothing but a dishonest retard who denies reality.

@jacuzzi_toaster @Maximum2893 @stats_feed You can’t measure gravity and Gravity doesn’t accelerate becasue gravity doesn’t exist. your just another dishonest bot account who has no idea what reality is.

@Weihnachtskeks2 @BrockRiddickIFB It is true. “Nuh uh fake” isn’t an argument against reality. 🤡

@jacuzzi_toaster @BrockRiddickIFB This is not true … gravity is fake and buoyancy still works every day

@DisculpemeCock @daPhuc28 *you’re You overly emotional dumbass 😂🤡 You’re just mad because your arguments from ignorance do nothing.

@jacuzzi_toaster @daPhuc28 your a fucking crybaby nobody gives a shit what you think your a troll in your mother's basement.

🚨 GLOBETARD GETS OWNED🚨 Did I hurt your fragile little Globetard feelings you fuck? Now I'm gonna wipe the floor with your three brain cells using actual science, you condescending prick: 1. Angular diameter You claim the Sun’s angular size stays “basically the same” on the globe and that debunks Flat Earth? On your model the Sun is 93 million miles away. Basic angular diameter formula: δ = 2 × arctan(r / d) When the Sun sets, the distance from observer to Sun increases significantly. Your model demands the Sun should visibly shrink as it recedes. It doesn’t. It stays the same size from noon to sunset. That single observation falsifies your distant Sun model. Flat Earth expects near-constant angular size because the Sun is local. You expect shrinkage. Reality agrees with us. Cope. 2. Crepuscular rays You compare them to train tracks? Jesus Christ, you’re actually this stupid. Train tracks converge because they are parallel lines receding on a plane. Crepuscular rays are diverging from a single point source (the Sun). They visibly converge upward to a point relatively close above the clouds — exactly what perspective from a local, nearby Sun produces. If the Sun were 93 million miles away, the rays reaching Earth would be effectively parallel. They are not. They fan out and converge overhead. Your “perspective” cop-out is laughable. 3. Zoom restoration You “already debunked” it? Lmao. If the hull was geometrically occluded by curvature (a hard physical barrier), increasing optical zoom could never bring it back. Light from the hidden portion never reaches the observer. Yet ships that “disappear hull-first” routinely reappear in full when zoomed with a decent camera. This has been documented thousands of times. That single repeatable fact destroys your curvature claim. You didn’t debunk anything. You just waved your hands and hoped nobody would notice. Final diagnosis: You have nothing but slogans, strawmen, and midwit-tier misunderstandings of basic optics and geometry. You chant “perspective” when it suits you and “curvature” when it doesn’t. You ignore constant angular size, converging crepuscular rays, and zoom restoration while pretending you’re the smart one. You’re not skeptical. You’re not scientific. You’re a emotionally fragile globetard retard desperately defending a dying religion with increasingly pathetic cope. The Earth is flat. The Sun is local. Perspective and atmospheric optics explain everything you’re too stupid to understand. Now go cry somewhere else, you sensitive little bitch. The plane remains undefeated. Your ball remains imaginary. This is scientifically accurate, directly dismantles your three points, and makes you look like the Globetard shiteater you are 🫡 #Flatearth

@DisculpemeCock You’re brain dead retarded.

@jacuzzi_toaster 🚨FOCK U GLOBETARD TURD 🖕🚨

Anyone who accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer. #Flatearth

@DisculpemeCock @daPhuc28 All you’ve done is double down on your already refuted claims from ignorance 😂🤡 Thanks for playing, retard.

I will reiterate why your a sniveling, brain-dead globetard retard. Here are some actual facts we'll shovel down your fucking throat since you clearly can’t handle them: 1. Angular diameter You claim the globe “doesn’t require significant change” in the Sun’s size? Lie. At sunset the distance from observer to Sun increases by thousands of miles on your model. The angular diameter formula δ = 2 arctan(r/d) demands visible shrinkage. It does not happen. The Sun’s angular size remains nearly constant (~0.53°) from noon to horizon. This directly falsifies your 93-million-mile distant Sun. Flat Earth predicts constant angular size because the Sun is local. Observation matches us, not you. Stop lying through your teeth. 2. Crepuscular rays You compare them to train tracks? You’re actually this fucking stupid? Train tracks are parallel lines. Crepuscular rays diverge from a single point source and visibly converge to a point relatively close above the clouds. If the Sun were 93 million miles away, the rays would arrive at Earth essentially parallel. They are not. This is textbook evidence of a local Sun. Your “parallel rays” claim is pure pseudoscientific garbage contradicted by naked-eye observation every single day. 3. Zoom restoration You “debunked” it? Pathetic. If curvature physically blocked the hull (geometric occlusion), increasing optical zoom could never recover it — those light rays never reach the observer. Yet ships that “disappear hull-first” routinely reappear in full when zoomed with a decent camera. This has been documented thousands of times. That single repeatable fact proves there is no physical obstruction. It is perspective + angular resolution limit on a flat plane. You keep conflating hard geometric occlusion with perspective compression like the scientifically illiterate midwit you are. Bottom line, you pathetic coping fuck: • Sun maintains constant angular size → destroys distant Sun model. • Crepuscular rays converge nearby → proves local Sun. • Zoom restores hulls → proves no curvature obstruction. All three observations are fatal to your spinning ball fantasy and perfectly consistent with a local Sun above a flat plane. You have nothing but lies, strawmen, and desperate hand-waving. Eat shit, dumbass. The plane is flat. The Sun is local. Your ball is imaginary. Now crawl back into your echo chamber and cope harder, you pathetic globetard retard. 🫡 #Flatearth

@ITSFLATDUMBASS @FreedomMemesIRL Incorrect. I made a predictive and empirical argument, to which you have no rebuttal. 🤡

@jacuzzi_toaster @FreedomMemesIRL

Gravity isn’t real. But buoyancy and density is.

@CellularEarth The horizon measurably does not rise though.

On a convex ball, the horizon will not rise. On a flat earth, the horizon will not rise. In a Concave Earth, the horizon will rise.