Angehefteter Tweet
James Smith
20.4K posts

James Smith
@jamessmith2012
You only live once, But if you do it right, once is enough! Glasgow Celtic 🍀💚
Glasgow Beigetreten Aralık 2011
743 Folgt1.4K Follower
James Smith retweetet

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 It’s a simple question. Are they putting the money in themselves or are they raising the money and covering what it’s injected elsewhere? Cause we both know the answer you just don’t want to say it 😂
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 Believe what I want? It’s literally right there in front of you! Just because you don’t want to take that on board doesn’t mean it’s not true!

English

The confidence of him whilst having absolutely no clue what he is discussing is off the scale.
Craig Whyte@RIPRFC
money is no issue they said.May 25, 2025 Less than a year later they are having another share issue😂😂😂
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 In how the fundraising is conducted 😭😭😭 what’s fundraising? Hahaha is that again getting money from somewhere else?
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 😂😂😂 ok you believe what you want. Pointless arguing with someone that knows better than AI grok etc. the rangers statement that clearly says they are raising money is lies and they are not raising money they have to offer it to them 😭😭 fucking weird cunt you are bud.
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 Grok clearly can’t read things for you! Why you’ve posted literally tells you what I’ve been telling you! They current have pre-emption rights.. so had to be offered.. which they’re trying to remove going forward!
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 Why have you posted this? 🤣 It literally tells you what I’ve been telling you!
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 Go on tell me Groks wrong and your right because you don’t want to believe it 😭😭
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 They’re not ASKING they’re bound to do it by pre-emption rights, how many times do you have to be told that? 🥴 AGAIN, they’re trying to remove those rights, why would they do that if they needed current shareholders money?
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 Calling me thick when you’ve made a cunt of your self AGAIN 😭😭😭😭
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 Wow mate! You’re honestly thick as fuck! I’ve told you why thy have to allow current shareholders the opportunity to keep their shareholding levels & that the owners are trying to remove those rights! If you can’t take that info in then that’s on you!
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 It’s you that’s thick as fuck. Not me.
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 This isn’t your argument your argument was they are not asking for money THEY ARE they don’t need too they can inject 30m if they want. Go read it again. They are RAISING money they are getting it from elsewhere what is it that’s so hard to understand about that?
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 City & Chelsea have had share issues in the last year or so, are they small clubs too? 🤦♂️ They literally can’t have a share issue without offering the same to current shareholders due to pre-emption rights! Again.. why would they be trying to remove those rights?
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 Google what RAISING means 😂 it means they are getting it from somewhere else 😂😂😂 thick hun cunt 😂😂
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 They are.. they’re not asking anybody to invest, they’re allowing current shareholders to keep their shareholding.. all whilst trying to to remove that right so they don’t have to do it in future! That somehow in your head means they’re not financially stable and are begging 🥴
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 No point I know if they wanted to put the money in themselves they could 😂😂
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 Go google what pre-emotion rights are 🤦♂️
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 Stop making a cunt of your self they are asking for money whether you like it or not. That’s what small clubs do. 😂😂
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 They literally HAVE to… again why would they be trying to remove that right if they were requiring funds from current shareholders? 🥴
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 😂😂you’ve came on here saying they are putting the money in themselves if they wanted to do this they would and could very easily. Now you’ve been proven wrong your finding other angles to argue. Bottom line is they are asking for money and if it’s not coughed up they cover it.
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 Good lord 🤦♂️ The current shareholders have pre-emption rights that mean they have to be allowed to purchase the shares! They’re trying to remove these rights, why would they be doing that if they needed money from the other 49%?
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 Doesn’t matter what way you spin this if they were putting the money in them self they would have said we have injected 16m in through a share issue not we are RAISING money through one. They will cover what isn’t raised and they obviously expect that to be a lot.
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 You’ve already quoted it yourself… “on a pro rata basis” the only purpose of it is for current shareholders to keep their current shareholding, not to get money out of them 🤦♂️
English

@ScttC72 @awitsyersel1888 No what they said is they will cover what isn’t bought they are asking fans and shareholders to buy and they will cover what’s not taking up. It’s not begging but it’s asking for money whether you like it or not. Grok has gave you the source it’s not made up.
English

@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 All that info is there to read, you don’t need to be asking AI! They’ve already said they’re covering it regardless, allowing current majority shareholders the opportunity to buy in to keep their % of shares up isn’t begging or asking for fans input ffs 🤣
English


@jamessmith2012 @awitsyersel1888 You’re doing the same as the Craig Whyte account, talking about something you clearly have no clue what you’re talking about with such confidence 🤦♂️
English


