Joseph Galarneau
14.8K posts

Joseph Galarneau
@joegalarn
AI+creative data as @Vidmob CPTO. Ex: co-founder/CEO Utilityze,CivicScience CPO, Wayfair global martech prod head, Mezzobit founder/CEO, Newsweek/DailyBeast COO
NYC & often other places Beigetreten Mart 2009
784 Folgt1.1K Follower

@skalskip92 But SAM3 consumes a crazy amount of resources to do that.
English

there's no catch; SAM3 is open source and really good
one of the things it does really well is object tracking, even in crazy complex scenes like basketball
probably my favorite computer vision model ever
ludwig@ludwigABAP
what’s the catch with SAM models from Meta that no one seems to be using them to build the obvious awesome products one could build on top of them? I don’t get it
English

Lorne Michaels: “The thing that kills most things is overthinking.” nytimes.com/2026/04/22/mov…
English

Been @nyrr member off and on for more than two decades, but no longer see the point. Races sell out in minutes months in advance. And costs gone through the roof. Maybe if I’m training for marathon, but otherwise, nope.
English

AI + creative data + product marketing: Join my NYC team!
jobs.ashbyhq.com/Vidmob/fb9010c…
English

The rise of synthetic mediocrity in AI ad creative. It doesn't have to be that way. vidblog.vidmob.com/blog/distincti…
English

Happy that @JohnHMcWhorter has returned to Lexicon Valley. I, for one, appreciate doses of linguistic wonkiness sprinkled with show tunes.
English

@aakashgupta Wrapper company using a standard IDE. No product mojo that can't be easily knocked off -- it's just distribution. The past few months have shown us this can be a shallow moat in AI land.
English

Cursor is raising at a $50 billion valuation on the claim that its “in-house models generate more code than almost any other LLMs in the world.” Less than 24 hours after launching Composer 2, a developer found the model ID in the API response: kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast.
That’s Moonshot AI’s Kimi K2.5 with reinforcement learning appended. A developer named Fynn was testing Cursor’s OpenAI-compatible base URL when the identifier leaked through the response headers. Moonshot’s head of pretraining, Yulun Du, confirmed on X that the tokenizer is identical to Kimi’s and questioned Cursor’s license compliance. Two other Moonshot employees posted confirmations. All three posts have since been deleted.
This is the second time. When Cursor launched Composer 1 in October 2025, users across multiple countries reported the model spontaneously switching its inner monologue to Chinese mid-session. Kenneth Auchenberg, a partner at Alley Corp, posted a screenshot calling it a smoking gun. KR-Asia and 36Kr confirmed both Cursor and Windsurf were running fine-tuned Chinese open-weight models underneath. Cursor never disclosed what Composer 1 was built on. They shipped Composer 1.5 in February and moved on.
The pattern: take a Chinese open-weight model, run RL on coding tasks, ship it as a proprietary breakthrough, publish a cost-performance chart comparing yourself against Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 without disclosing that your base model was free, then raise another round.
That chart from the Composer 2 announcement deserves its own paragraph. Cursor plotted Composer 2 against frontier models on a price-vs-quality axis to argue they’d hit a superior tradeoff. What the chart doesn’t show is that Anthropic and OpenAI trained their models from scratch. Cursor took an open-weight model that Moonshot spent hundreds of millions developing, ran RL on top, and presented the output as evidence of in-house research. That’s margin arbitrage on someone else’s R&D dressed up as a benchmark slide.
The license makes this more than an attribution oversight. Kimi K2.5 ships under a Modified MIT License with one clause designed for exactly this scenario: if your product exceeds $20 million in monthly revenue, you must prominently display “Kimi K2.5” on the user interface. Cursor’s ARR crossed $2 billion in February. That’s roughly $167 million per month, 8x the threshold. The clause covers derivative works explicitly.
Cursor is valued at $29.3 billion and raising at $50 billion. Moonshot’s last reported valuation was $4.3 billion. The company worth 12x more took the smaller company’s model and shipped it as proprietary technology to justify a valuation built on the frontier lab narrative.
Three Composer releases in five months. Composer 1 caught speaking Chinese. Composer 2 caught with a Kimi model ID in the API. A P0 incident this year. And a benchmark chart that compares an RL fine-tune against models requiring billions in training compute without disclosing the base was free.
The question for investors in the $50 billion round: what exactly are you buying? A VS Code fork with strong distribution, or a frontier research lab? The model ID in the API answers that.
If Moonshot doesn’t enforce this license against a company generating $2 billion annually from a derivative of their model, the attribution clause becomes decoration for every future open-weight release. Every AI lab watching this is running the same math: why open-source your model if companies with better distribution can strip attribution, call it proprietary, and raise at 12x your valuation?
kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast is the most expensive model ID leak in the history of AI licensing.
Harveen Singh Chadha@HarveenChadha
things are about to get interesting from here on
English

What does the world of infinite ad creative enabled by AI look like? It will be a huge advantage for brands that can up their data game at the same time. For others, visual chaos. My thoughts: vidblog.vidmob.com/blog/infinite-…
English

Having spent half of professional life in media & other half in startups, annoyed by journos complaining how laws of physics don’t apply to newsrooms. Real factor: they don’t like change from outside their culture, only from within. True of many humans. nytimes.com/2026/03/14/bus…
English





