Angehefteter Tweet
Khoded
152.3K posts


Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet

🚨BREAKING: Didier Drogba says the Ghana government launching an official protest against the Canada government on Thomas Partey visa denial and Warning them to overturn that unfortunate decisions is the right thing to do
"I think the Ghanaian government is absolutely right to stand up for one of its citizens. Whether you agree with Thomas Partey or not, every person deserves fair treatment and due process."
"What I respect is that Ghana didn't stay silent. They reportedly made their position clear and challenged a decision they felt was unfair and damaging."
"Too often African countries are expected to simply accept decisions made elsewhere without asking questions. This time, Ghana decided to ask those questions."
"If a player has not been found guilty in a court of law, then governments and football authorities have to be very careful about the message they send."
"The World Cup is supposed to bring nations together. It should not become a competition where administrative decisions create unnecessary controversy before the football even starts."
"I understand every country has the right to enforce its own laws and immigration policies, but there also has to be consistency, transparency and respect."
"For me, the important thing is that Ghana defended one of its own and made sure its concerns were heard at the highest level. That's exactly what any government should do for its citizens."
"Whether the decision is eventually overturned or not, Ghana sending a strong protest shows that African nations are becoming more confident in defending their people on the global stage, and I think that's something many Africans will support."


English
Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet

🚨🗣️ 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Benjamin Mendy on Thomas Partey ruled out of Ghana’s crucial opening World Cup match against Panama due to his visa being denied by Canada over unproven allegations:
“People are asking me what I think about Thomas Partey being refused entry into Canada, and my answer is simple: football is becoming a courtroom where the verdict is delivered before the trial even begins.
I’ve seen this movie before. The headlines arrive first, the judgment follows immediately, and the truth is left struggling to catch up. In today’s world, an accusation can spread across the planet in seconds, while facts have to walk barefoot through a storm just to be heard.
We keep hearing people say, ‘No one is above the law.’ I agree completely. But the law works both ways. Justice isn’t only about punishment; it’s also about fairness. If we’re willing to throw away the principle of innocence the moment a headline appears, then we are replacing justice with emotion.
Football fans need to understand the danger here. Today it’s Thomas Partey. Yesterday it was someone else. Tomorrow it could be your favorite player. Once you create a culture where allegations alone are enough to destroy reputations in the eyes of millions, you’ve opened a door that won’t be easy to close.
Social media has become a wildfire. One spark, and suddenly everyone wants to be the judge, the jury, and the executioner. Careers are burned to ashes before a single verdict is reached. People speak with absolute certainty about things they know only through tweets, clips, and headlines.
And let’s be honest: if Thomas Partey was available and scoring goals next week, many of the same people acting morally superior today would be celebrating him if he played for their club. Football has always had selective outrage. Fans often care less about principles and more about whose badge is on the shirt.
What I see today is a dangerous trend. We are moving toward a world where public opinion carries more weight than due process. A world where hashtags are treated like evidence and viral posts are treated like legal documents.
Nobody is asking for special treatment. Nobody is asking for immunity. All I’m saying is that justice should remain in the hands of courts, not timelines. Let investigations speak. Let evidence speak. Let facts speak.
Because if football continues down this road, the game won’t be decided on the pitch anymore. It’ll be decided by whoever can generate the loudest outrage online.
And that’s a far more frightening precedent than any result on a football field.”
— TalksViewPodcast /YT


English
Khoded retweetet

Everyday Law for Everyday people.
Daniel, a 32-year-old software engineer, meets Ama, a 29-year-old graphic designer, at a social event in Accra. They spend the evening together and later return to Ama’s residence.
Before engaging in sexual intercourse, Daniel expressly states that he does not want children and is careful to avoid any possibility of pregnancy. Ama agrees that the encounter is intended to be a casual, one-time sexual relationship. Daniel uses a condom throughout intercourse.
After ejaculation, Daniel removes the condom, ties it, and disposes of it in a wastebasket located in Ama’s bathroom. He spends a short period of time at the residence before leaving.
Unknown to Daniel, after he departs, Ama retrieves the discarded condom from the wastebasket. Desiring to become pregnant and believing Daniel possesses qualities she would like in the father of her future child, she extracts semen from the condom using a syringe and artificially inseminates herself.
Several weeks later, Ama discovers that she is pregnant. She does not initially disclose the circumstances of conception to Daniel.
Nine months later, she gives birth to a daughter, Adwoa.
A DNA test subsequently confirms with 99.99% certainty that Daniel is the biological father.
When informed of the circumstances surrounding conception, Daniel states that he never consented to father a child and that his use of a condom demonstrated an affirmative intention to prevent conception. He contends that he has been made a father through conduct that circumvented his reproductive choices.
Ama responds that:
* Daniel voluntarily engaged in sexual intercourse.
* He voluntarily ejaculated.
* He voluntarily discarded the condom in her home.
* The child is biologically his.
* Whatever dispute exists between the adults should not affect the rights and welfare of the child.
Ama applies to court for declarations of paternity, child maintenance, inheritance rights, and other parental obligations.
Daniel commences a separate action seeking declarations that:
* He did not consent to reproduction.
* He should not be treated as a legal parent.
* Alternatively, he should not be liable for child support.
* Alternatively, he should be entitled to damages for the non-consensual use of his genetic material.
You are the judge. How would you rule?

English
Khoded retweetet

🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Ghana's government strongly disagrees with Canada's decision of not allowing Thomas Partey in their country, and has asked Canadian authorities to reconsider.
Ghana's Sports Minister, Kofi Adams, said the decision is based on "very weak grounds" because being charged with a crime does not mean someone is guilty.
He pointed out that Partey is still free to live and travel in England while awaiting trial, and said it is surprising that Canada is treating the charges as if they were a conviction.


English

Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet
Khoded retweetet
















