Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD

1.9K posts

Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD banner
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD

Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD

@lydialambda

she/they/it 1997 ♊♎♏ pharmd but mostly philosophy/spirituality/consciousness guess it's been three years since rip twitter

🇨🇦 Beigetreten Ocak 2016
915 Folgt78 Follower
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
shadow work guide
shadow work guide@anokariver·
I like this and also want to add that shyness is ingrained into the nervous system (so that’s why it feels like it becomes part of the personality - as does everything ingrained into the nervous system). In order to break free you’ll have to process some intense shame and fear from trauma that is keeping it stuck in your nervous system
Electra@Electrarythm

Shyness lives at the identity level. At some point you decided you were the kind of person who is not safe to be fully seen, and every shy moment since has been you obeying that decision. Most people think shyness is about other people. It is not. It is about the relationship you have with yourself when other people are watching. You are not afraid of strangers, you are afraid of being witnessed inside an identity you do not fully believe in. The discomfort you feel in a room is the gap between who you are pretending to be and who you secretly think you are, and that gap gets exposed the moment eyes land on you. This is why advice like "just be confident" does nothing. You cannot perform confidence on top of an identity that does not include it. Your voice shrinks, your shoulders round, your eyes find the floor, because your body is loyal to the picture underneath, and the picture says you should not take up space. Shyness is almost always a protection strategy from childhood. Being seen got punished at some point. You were laughed at, criticized, or raised by someone whose attention felt unsafe, and you learned that staying small was how you survived. It is an outdated survival response that nobody updated. For most people pushing yourself into situation after situation only works on the surface. The identity underneath stays the same, and the moment your effort drops, it pulls you back to where you started. Actual change happens when you shift who you believe you are in private, since that is the version of you that shows up in public. The shift happens when you stop trying to overcome shyness and start questioning the identity that produces it. You sit with the actual belief, that you are too much or not enough or fundamentally not built for this, and you ask where it came from. Most of the time it was installed by someone whose opinion you would not trust today, and your entire shyness is built on a foundation laid by a person who no longer has any authority in your life. Then you build a new identity through vivid daily imagination, rehearsing the version of you that has nothing to hide, until it becomes more familiar than the old one. The behavior follows on its own. The version of you that emerges on the other side of this is not someone new. It is who you would have been all along if you had not been busy managing how you came across.

English
8
67
1.1K
47.5K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
There's a dynamic where you can spiral and it makes everythign worse, and I think this happens a lot in sex deprived relationships. Once I had a relationship where I wanted more physical affection (hugs, cuddles) from my partner when he didn't feel like it; this ended up with a horrible dynamic where when I made a bid for affection, he'd feel like I was trying to carelessly use him despite me *knowing* he didn't want to touch me. And I felt rejected, like if he actually wanted me, why wouldn't he want my touch? etc. And this made it so every little motion became a symbol of the entire thing. I reach my hand out for his, suddenly there is Pressure. This is now Meaningful. Am I going to get my needs met? If he reaches out to take my hand is this gonna encourage me to touch him more? In low-sex marriages, the higher-drive partner's initiation of sex is never independent of what it Means. It's never casual. Never chill. It's a scene in a movie of two enemies where only one will come out the winner. It's really hard to get out of this dynamic. Usually the best option is to just go chill out, get your needs met elsewhere, totally relieve the pressure on the low-drive person until bids for sex don't come with the weight anymore, where if the husband reaches to his wife at night and she says no, she knows this isn't gonna matter really, he doesn't *need* it from her. And that lack of neediness might, eventually, make the defenses drop and cause her to be more open to sex. It's just, with sex specifically, monogamy blocks all other ways to relieve the pressure, which is why this specific problem pops up so much in monogamous relationships. Monogamy creates a world where there is a scarce resource (being happy with sex life) and two people are struggling with each other on who gets it.
wanye@xwanyex

Both sides of this debate, in my view, are unwilling to confront the issue head on, which is to say that men get horny and want to have sex and they’re annoyed if they can’t get it from their wives, who they feel on some level are obligated (and should want to) provide it. From the men’s point of view this is something that they desire, something that they want, something that they enjoy, something that only their wives can give them, and the general message is that this is at bottom not a serious concern. Neither side wants to take this seriously. Women just say outright that this is a crass, unimportant concern, so then men, some of whom seem to agree with that assessment, try to frame it as though the sex is really about connection and feeling and emotional completeness and really you need to have sex with us because this is how we express love in a relationship. The only way through this is just to say directly that men get horny, they want sex, and it’s very annoying when their wives won’t give it to them. The women in their lives either take this seriously and treat the concerns of their husband as something worth caring about and addressing, even if part of them thinks it’s kind of base and crass, or they don’t. And so while for many men it’s not really true that the sex itself is about connection and emotion, the lack of it is absolutely about denial and rejection and an unwillingness to provide something that the man feels is so simple to provide. From the man’s point of view it’s just like, actually I am very simple, actually my needs are very simple, actually it is very simple to provide for me what I need and what I desire, actually you have all the tools to provide it, actually it’s not even a little bit complicated. And yet.

English
33
22
730
136.4K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Electra
Electra@Electrarythm·
Shyness lives at the identity level. At some point you decided you were the kind of person who is not safe to be fully seen, and every shy moment since has been you obeying that decision. Most people think shyness is about other people. It is not. It is about the relationship you have with yourself when other people are watching. You are not afraid of strangers, you are afraid of being witnessed inside an identity you do not fully believe in. The discomfort you feel in a room is the gap between who you are pretending to be and who you secretly think you are, and that gap gets exposed the moment eyes land on you. This is why advice like "just be confident" does nothing. You cannot perform confidence on top of an identity that does not include it. Your voice shrinks, your shoulders round, your eyes find the floor, because your body is loyal to the picture underneath, and the picture says you should not take up space. Shyness is almost always a protection strategy from childhood. Being seen got punished at some point. You were laughed at, criticized, or raised by someone whose attention felt unsafe, and you learned that staying small was how you survived. It is an outdated survival response that nobody updated. For most people pushing yourself into situation after situation only works on the surface. The identity underneath stays the same, and the moment your effort drops, it pulls you back to where you started. Actual change happens when you shift who you believe you are in private, since that is the version of you that shows up in public. The shift happens when you stop trying to overcome shyness and start questioning the identity that produces it. You sit with the actual belief, that you are too much or not enough or fundamentally not built for this, and you ask where it came from. Most of the time it was installed by someone whose opinion you would not trust today, and your entire shyness is built on a foundation laid by a person who no longer has any authority in your life. Then you build a new identity through vivid daily imagination, rehearsing the version of you that has nothing to hide, until it becomes more familiar than the old one. The behavior follows on its own. The version of you that emerges on the other side of this is not someone new. It is who you would have been all along if you had not been busy managing how you came across.
Path of Men@PathOfMen_

As a man, you will miss a lot of opportunity if you are shy. The job goes to the guy who spoke up. The girl goes home with the guy who approached. The deal closes for the man who asked. Shyness feels safe but it is one of the most expensive habits you can have. Every door that never opened, every connection that never happened, every version of your life that stayed out of reach — most of it traces back to moments you stayed quiet when you should have moved. Cure the shyness. Everything else gets easier.

English
14
383
3.5K
225.9K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
jo johnson
jo johnson@josbjohnson·
you must create because the thing you’d make doesn’t exist anywhere else. nobody has your exact combination of experiences and wounds and obsessions, which means the work only you could make is genuinely irreplaceable. if you don’t make it, it simply never exists. the world just goes without it, never knowing what it missed. that’s the most exciting thing about being you. the thing is waiting and you’re the only door it has.
English
20
1.5K
6.2K
96.7K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Nornal Guy 🧙‍♂️
The majority of women who call themselves “feminine” are actually repressed and wearing a mask of femininity to attract men. These women often build resentment because they haven’t truly surrendered; they’ve simply learned to perform softness and submission. A truly feminine woman is unimpressed by false masculinity because she is deeply masculine herself. She can feel the difference between embodied strength and a performance—feminine LARPers can’t.
PROFESSOR@SIGMAPROFESSOR

the more feminine the woman, the more masculine she is from within. The more feminine, therefore the the stronger, the loyal, the powerful, and of great character because she will then definitely possess these masculine virtues.

English
16
62
662
28.9K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
blue
blue@bluewmist·
i regret to inform you that personal growth rarely comes from acquiring new knowledge and almost always from: •getting humiliated •showing up terrified and doing it anyway •admitting you might be the problem
English
90
2.9K
21.8K
294.3K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD@lydialambda·
@ChillSpeedster @lichthauch Ask her the future she envisions with you - she might? The real question is, is it the future you want, and are determined enough to try to create - or not? Schrödinger’s cat
English
1
0
1
14
єmmαnuєl🧙‍♂️❤️
єmmαnuєl🧙‍♂️❤️@ChillSpeedster·
@lichthauch This girl keeps telling me she loves me And she loves everything about me, and she believes in me And I don't know if she's naive or she's seen into the future
English
1
0
7
913
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
🕊️
🕊️@lichthauch·
The women who possess this particular faculty of seeing a man's unfinished architecture before he's even laid the foundation have almost universally been through something that stripped them down to their own studs first. you cannot develop that kind of vision without having been demolished and rebuilt at least once because that is what they are recognizing in you, their own process mirrored back in another body
asparagoid@asparagoid

The best girls intuitively see your potential a little before you do and look at you like it already exists. Their unshakeable belief in you functions like a catalyst. It helps you believe magic is possible and you take way bigger leaps than you otherwise would

English
19
115
1.3K
70.9K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
🕊️
🕊️@lichthauch·
God honors his favorites by crushing them, drops the whole insufferable wretched weight of purpose on their spines until they either snap into shape or snap entirely. the unburdened, those buoyant grinning vapid little phantoms drifting through their own lives without a single crushing thing to carry, they are forgotten
English
209
1.8K
13.8K
1.4M
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
xana
xana@xanaofficial_·
“you’d have to stop the world just to stop the feeling” is probs the best lyric ever written if u think abt it
English
81
11.1K
138.8K
1.8M
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD@lydialambda·
@ontaiah It's beautiful Idk there's something about the lens A change in perspective view Bringing inner change Alignment, focus Definitely been there THC, psilocybin I feel some of the most meaningful, artistic, beautiful photos of mine have been during difficult mental states
English
1
0
2
20
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Visa is doing marketing consults (see pinned!)
how you can give constructive feedback to anyone without directly: 1. identify the best (or least bad) element in the work 2. identify something improvable and say “I’d be curious to see what happens if you… (started with X / left out Y/etc) 3. lookin forward to the next one!
taoki@justalexoki

idk why we're expected to lie to kids. like it's very obviously not a good drawing. i know that, im pretty sure he knows that. why would i lie to his face, just because he's 5? if anything it's more important to tell him the truth now so that he has time to get better at it

English
8
7
342
21.3K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Haus of Decline
Haus of Decline@hausofdecline·
Haus of Decline tweet media
ZXX
393
3.1K
72.7K
2.4M
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
Daniel Mayakovski
Daniel Mayakovski@DaniMayakovski·
En el este de Camerún, asi se ven las minas de oro, con madres con sus bebés en brazos y niños de menos de 5 años recolectando el mineral en aguas contaminadas, para llenar los bolsillos a los capitalistas. Esto es el capitalismo, pero como no ves su cadena de producción esclavista en los paises donde los buitres capitalistas saquean los recursos, parece que este otro mundo no existe. Ya lo decía Lenin hace más de 100 años: "El capitalismo convierte incluso a los niños en mercancía; millones de niños en países colonizados africanos mueren de hambre y trabajan como esclavos para que las damas burguesas de París Ileven seda, oro y diamantes".
Español
162
7.8K
11.9K
216.7K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD retweetet
love drops
love drops@lovedropx·
love drops tweet media
ZXX
0
71
352
8.1K
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD@lydialambda·
Feeling it from everywhere lately Keeping my time filled Have to look away, often enough At myself without having to be reminded
English
0
0
0
7
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD@lydialambda·
If the technology is getting consciousness thankfully love comes built in with that
English
1
0
0
8
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD@lydialambda·
@hecubian_devil @jamespthomas92 @jessesingal The assumption that it is genetic is completely fraught. The assumption that it is environmental has to be wrong. If it is 80-90% environmental then e.g. siblings should be similarly talented within an ~80% CI. Maybe we're more than just genetics and environment
English
0
0
0
25
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD
Dr. Lydia λ, PharmD@lydialambda·
@hecubian_devil @jamespthomas92 @jessesingal I think that's just it. Innate ability is an obvious reality and we're examining the source of it. We presume with current science that human traits are either genetic, or environmental. Who's to say some people aren't just blessed with it?
English
3
0
0
93
Cassie Pritchard
Cassie Pritchard@hecubian_devil·
I said *some* liberals exhibit motivated reasoning *around IQ,* ironically because it flatters their self-image as rational, dispassionate empiricists, dunking on hysterical, emotional leftists. To which Jesse responds, snidely, ‘oh, the hysterical leftists thinks *we’re* irrational? Hah!’ Of course this supports my exact point; I made a specific claim about what I believe motivates *some* liberal pundits to hold incorrect beliefs *about IQ and heredity* specifically. I actually made no claim as to a *general epistemic character* of liberals, or of leftists, and I didn’t position leftists as resolutely empiric and skeptical (anyone who follows me knows I would never do this; I am constantly haranguing my fellow leftists for insufficient empiricism). But instead of disagreeing with the specific claims I made—even snidely or rudely, that would be fine—Jesse *substitutes* for different claims entirely. Ones I didn’t make. He ridicules the premise that a leftist could ever criticize liberals for insufficient empiricism, an excess of ideological/social pressure, etc. He’s turning it from a debate about a specific issue into a debate about generalized archetypes. Liberals are correct because they are liberals. Leftists are incorrect because they are leftists. An individual leftist critiquing certain liberals on grounds of insufficient empiricism is facially absurd, to Jesse, because the categories don’t match. The liberal category/archetype is the rational one, and the leftist category/archetype is the emotional one. These archetypes override the individual case. Ironically, this is exactly what I’m critiquing—that a certain kind of liberal pundit, like Jesse here, is so convinced by this archetypical dynamic (the rationalist lib debunking the hysterical leftist), this kind of moralized narrative, that they let themselves sometimes be seduced into empirically wrong positions when it flatters this self-image. When it confirms the archetype and the stock narrative. If emotional leftists refuse to engage with IQ arguments empirically and try to shut it down with taboo, then the liberal can come in and fulfill their archetypal role as the dispassionate nerd. The narrative fits expectations. Therefore, the hereditarian position must be correct—because it fits the liberal’s mental model of lib-left disagreement, and their self-image as defenders of rationality against moralism and ideology. Of course, this is not *actually* an empirical basis for belief. It’s just negative polarization.
Jesse Singal@jessesingal

lib pundits: only believe stuff because their reasoning abilities have been perverted by ideology and groupthink and social pressure and the desire for attention online leftists: only believe stuff that is Objectively True; unaffected by other human dynamics

English
11
10
216
22K