Mike

10.7K posts

Mike

Mike

@mnobb

Back when men were men.

Beigetreten Mayıs 2009
240 Folgt176 Follower
Awful Announcing
Awful Announcing@awfulannouncing·
Gary Cohen: "A terrible decision by Chapman as he gets gunned down for the first out of the ninth with his team down by three runs!" Todd Zeile: "Gunned down, and rightly so. His run means nothing." Cohen: "It caps off a horrible, no good, awful week for Matt Chapman." #MLB
English
97
117
5.2K
927.5K
paper bag rider
paper bag rider@fromastairwell·
@mnobb @nickthecardman @awfulannouncing The runner matters enormously! Getting him home is not important. Keep him on base so Devers can come home. That's what "the run doesn't matter" means. Him scoring in isolation does not help the team.
English
1
0
0
15
paper bag rider
paper bag rider@fromastairwell·
@mnobb @nickthecardman @awfulannouncing The point is you need three runs. So getting someone on base is more or less as good as scoring the run. If Devers scores, by definition Chapman will have also scored. So no point taking a risk to try to get Chapman home. The first run only matters if two more runs score.
English
1
0
0
22
paper bag rider
paper bag rider@fromastairwell·
@mnobb @nickthecardman @awfulannouncing They need three runs to tie, so that first run means nothing. They need two men to get on base. Taking risks in order to score one meaningless run is bad baseball -- it's the 9th, you need three runs or you might as well not score. The run that matters is two men behind Chapman.
English
1
0
1
11
J-E-T-S_LGM
J-E-T-S_LGM@NYJ_LGM12·
@CaliSportsWave @mnobb @awfulannouncing No not in hindsight. Ofc it literally affects the score. No one is arguing otherwise. But the Mets would ignore that it keep playing as if nothing happened. The game plan is the same. It doesn’t affect them at all. Until tying run gets to the plate
English
1
0
0
14
Mike
Mike@mnobb·
@NYJ_LGM12 @awfulannouncing He obviously matters you dumb cuck. If he didn’t why throw him out? You’re just fucking stupid
English
1
0
0
13