
the phantom
13.4K posts



Today we honor the men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice for our freedoms. But, as an advocate for boys and men, I think it’s important to acknowledge something: From @JamesLNuzzo: Across all wars, the total number of American male war deaths is estimated at 1,170,432. The total number of American female war deaths is 618. This means males comprise 99.9% of the American military personnel who have been killed in the history of U.S. warfare. I think we should show more gratitude for men who are the vast majority of those who give their lives for us all to have better ones.


I know it’s 2026 and women are supposed to do what ever they want but the gym outfits are out of control. Some of these women literally wearing a bra and 3 inch compression shorts. It’s over revealing and it’s not dignified. And it’s honestly not even that attractive compared to tasteful cleavage. It feels like an over share that nobody asked for and it also normalizes a culture of immodesty. Leave it behind.

The sexual revolution destroyed women's bargaining power and men have been the primary beneficiaries ever since. Before the 1960s, if a man wanted physical intimacy, the price was commitment. Marriage. A ring. A promise before God and family. The sexual revolution removed that requirement entirely. Women were told that casual sex was empowering. That waiting was old-fashioned. But men and women are not the same. Men can walk away from casual hookups. Women are left with emotional attachment and potential pregnancy in a dating market where commitment is no longer expected. The cruel irony is that the movement marketed as women's liberation primarily served men's interests. Men got access without commitment. Women got freedom without security. Look around at the results: record-low marriage rates, record-high antidepressant prescriptions among young women, and a generation of men who see no reason to grow up. Who was really liberated here?

Most of those ferociously complaining about the budget have never worked in public policy, never had to consider balancing the huge issues in a $800 billion a year budget, never implemented reforms that impact all 28 million Australians, never copped the public hate campaigns against them & their families. We are seeing the lid being lifted on the priorities of those people.



You can read all about Mike Carlton’s life of drinking and abuse for $4 Where he brags about meeting Epstein’s frequent flyer, Bill Clinton. Champagne socialist Carlton met Clinton aboard a luxury yacht (Labor hack’s seem to spend lots of time in luxury hotels and on luxury yachts) and called him "an artist at work" 🤮 But in truth Carlton is most famous for his nastiness - and the fact that no one likes him He’s fought with everyone from Stan Zemanek, to John Laws, and Ray Hadley - who called Carlton a "drunk" “a low dog" and “the most hateful and vengeful broadcaster” he had ever encountered A well known Antisemite, Carlton left the SMH after racially attacking and vilifying readers with cartoons and responses like “Jewish bigot” and telling others Jewish readers to “f—k off.”Yet curiously he gets to keep his OA? Surely this is seen as bringing the Order in to disrepute So if he’s blocked you on X just remember he’s angry because he’s become irrelevant. No one wants to know about Carlton - not even for $4 Photo Credit: @marco_sidrat

Idea💡 Not only should we teach statistics to children, but we should also teach academics how to present data in clear and accessible ways. I've never understood why we don't do this... Researchers spend an entire lifetime learning their area of expertise; years and years of work, and then when it comes to finally delivering it to the reader, they just slap it in a table, with words like 'Standard Deviations', 'P-values', 'Confidence Interval's', and such. Why? Do you not want people to read it? What is the point of research, if it's obscured by jargon that only a small percentage of people can even understand? It's like a chef agonising over the perfect dish, and then insisting the customer stands on their head to eat it. If you're a researcher reading this, I promise you, a couple hours watching @mccandelish will do more good for your career than ten years worth of academic conferences. Because, it's not just about helping normal people to understand research, but also encouraging researchers to understand normal people, and how they communicate. Here you go... this will get you started: youtube.com/watch?v=5Zg-C8…


War does not affect everyone equally. Women and girls are more likely to be displaced, face sexual violence, and lose access to healthcare — all while trying to keep their families alive. See how war impacts women and girls in our new explainer: unwo.men/EOTT50Z2sL6

Seems like the drop in global fertility rates is caused largely by social media / smart phone adoption, rather than the cost of living, women's emancipation, incels, or the "crisis of masculinity". “If you spend lots of time socialising with your peers in the real world, your standards [for a potential partner] are anchored in the real world. If you spend your time on Instagram, your standards are anchored to an artificial sense of what is normal.” – Lyman Stone, Demographer Lesson: go outside. #selection-26905.9-26905.263" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">ft.com/content/fba35e…

It looks like we’re going to have more and more childless women in society. What consequences do you think this will have for humanity?

I once met a young woman doing a PhD in Eastern European history. In good faith, I asked her about the Srebrenica genocide, and she accused me of using it as ‘an anti-feminist talking point’. So if being anti-male-genocide is “anti feminist”, what does that say about feminism?

Great to see Australia signing overnight to a landmark UN ruling establishing our government's legal duty to protect Australians from the escalating global climate crisis. If we're getting serious about climate change, we should stop sacking the CSIRO scientists who measure it, stop subsidising big mining companies' use of fossil fuels through the diesel fuel rebate, and stop approving the new oil and gas projects which are now clearly against international law. We need actions, not gestures, to protect the next generation from climate change. abc.net.au/news/2026-05-2…


NAILED IT: Jeff Bezos: “A nurse in Queens who makes $75K a year pays more than $12K a year in taxes. Does that really make sense?” “So people talk about making the tax system more progressive. How about we start by having the nurse in Queens NOT pay taxes? At all!” “Why is a nurse in Queens who makes $75K a year paying more than $1K a month in taxes?” “That’s $1K a month that could help with rent or groceries or anything.” “And by the way, do you know what that all adds up to? The bottom half of income earners in this country pay only 3% of the taxes. It’s only 3%.” “We can find 3%. So we don’t have... it’s a small amount of money for the government. You know that. And the more I thought about it, to me, it’s kind of absurd that we’re doing this.” “We shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington — they should be sending her an apology. It really makes no sense.” Exactly!

