the phantom

13.4K posts

the phantom

the phantom

@phantomime

I am an dog

Beigetreten Eylül 2010
160 Folgt134 Follower
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
Gamma bias again Technically, in statistics over 99.7% is "near certainty" Whilst fully acknowledging women's service - especially atrocities such as Japanese murder of Australian nurses - referring simply to "men & women" is dismissive It's 100% certain we don't do it for DV
Lisa Britton@LisaBritton

Today we honor the men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice for our freedoms. But, as an advocate for boys and men, I think it’s important to acknowledge something: From @JamesLNuzzo: Across all wars, the total number of American male war deaths is estimated at 1,170,432. The total number of American female war deaths is 618. This means males comprise 99.9% of the American military personnel who have been killed in the history of U.S. warfare. I think we should show more gratitude for men who are the vast majority of those who give their lives for us all to have better ones.

English
0
0
1
9
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
Nothing you just said has anything to do with that post
English
0
0
0
1
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
Silly comment Stephen Anyone can criticise govt policy - it's up to you to weigh that criticism, depending on who's doing the criticising Conversely, *not* anyone can create govt policy and the punters have the right to expect policy makers to be competent Get the difference?
Stephen Koukoulas@TheKouk

Most of those ferociously complaining about the budget have never worked in public policy, never had to consider balancing the huge issues in a $800 billion a year budget, never implemented reforms that impact all 28 million Australians, never copped the public hate campaigns against them & their families. We are seeing the lid being lifted on the priorities of those people.

English
0
0
0
4
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
The perfect movie - I don't think it could be made today oddly enough
David Maywald@DavidMaywald

Casablanca (1942) endures not simply because it's romantic, stylish, and endlessly quotable, but because it presents men and women as different, valuable, and profoundly complementary... At its centre are Rick Blaine and Ilsa Lund: two wounded, intelligent adults navigating love, duty, war, and moral choice. Rick begins cynical, guarded, and detached, but beneath the hard exterior lies courage, loyalty, and a deeply ethical core. Ilsa brings warmth, emotional insight, compassion, and a powerful sense of human connection. Neither diminishes the other. Their differences matter; strengthening what they are able to see, feel, and ultimately do. This isn't a story about dominance, sameness, or individual gratification. It's about sacrifice, responsibility, and it's about love that extends beyond personal desire. Rick’s decisive action and willingness to bear pain intersect with Ilsa’s honesty, tenderness, and emotional truth. Together, they help illuminate the path toward something greater than themselves. Humphrey Bogart gives Rick a restrained but unforgettable masculinity: capable, resilient, dryly humorous, and morally awakened. Ingrid Bergman’s Ilsa is graceful, conflicted, and emotionally intelligent, conveying enormous depth with a glance or a pause. Set against the turmoil of World War II, Casablanca also reminds us that strong partnerships between men and women can serve not only personal happiness but higher ideals: courage, freedom, loyalty, and human flourishing. More than eighty years after it's release, Casablanca remains one of cinema’s great love stories because it recognises a timeless truth: masculinity and femininity need not compete. At their best, they can collaborate, challenge, and elevate one another. Few films portray that balance with such elegance, maturity, and emotional power.

English
0
0
1
2
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
Can you think of a nicer way of saying all that?
English
0
0
0
5
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
".... insisting the customer stands on their head to eat it" No it's more like insisting the customer reads the recipe *instead* of eating it Communication is a separate skill and not common in engineering types Jargon also is used as a qualifier and to show how clever I am
TheTinMen@TheTinMenBlog

Idea💡 Not only should we teach statistics to children, but we should also teach academics how to present data in clear and accessible ways. I've never understood why we don't do this... Researchers spend an entire lifetime learning their area of expertise; years and years of work, and then when it comes to finally delivering it to the reader, they just slap it in a table, with words like 'Standard Deviations', 'P-values', 'Confidence Interval's', and such. Why? Do you not want people to read it? What is the point of research, if it's obscured by jargon that only a small percentage of people can even understand? It's like a chef agonising over the perfect dish, and then insisting the customer stands on their head to eat it. If you're a researcher reading this, I promise you, a couple hours watching @mccandelish will do more good for your career than ten years worth of academic conferences. Because, it's not just about helping normal people to understand research, but also encouraging researchers to understand normal people, and how they communicate. Here you go... this will get you started: youtube.com/watch?v=5Zg-C8…

English
0
0
0
1
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
@JamesLNuzzo What is it about being shot at that the UN and Hillary Clinton refuse to understand?
English
0
0
2
148
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
Depends on what you mean by "women's emancipation" By most definitions it has had a huge effect on birthrates and social media has accelerated this Tell me when any noted feminist uttered a single word about the joy and sense of meaning to be found in motherhood
TheTinMen@TheTinMenBlog

Seems like the drop in global fertility rates is caused largely by social media / smart phone adoption, rather than the cost of living, women's emancipation, incels, or the "crisis of masculinity". “If you spend lots of time socialising with your peers in the real world, your standards [for a potential partner] are anchored in the real world. If you spend your time on Instagram, your standards are anchored to an artificial sense of what is normal.” – Lyman Stone, Demographer Lesson: go outside. #selection-26905.9-26905.263" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">ft.com/content/fba35e…

English
0
0
0
14
the phantom
the phantom@phantomime·
@clairlemon Wrong premise as there's a tax-free threshold in Australia It's just an argument of what that number should be
English
0
0
0
4