rakesh

22.1K posts

rakesh

rakesh

@rakeshkumar095

jai bhim

Beigetreten Temmuz 2023
72 Folgt48 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
rakesh
rakesh@rakeshkumar095·
हा में हिन्दू हूं ,लेकिन बीजेपी हिन्दू नहीं
हिन्दी
2
0
1
404
rakesh retweetet
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj@DeepikaBhardwaj·
This is not women empowerment. This is women INFANTILIZATION. If our courts think that a 31 year old able bodied woman can't earn for herself and a student must pay for her just because he's the husband, our Judges now need refresher training on what gender equality means. This boy was compelled to marry at 16. This is actually a case of sexual exploitation of a boy by an adult woman as she was 25 then. But he is the one being punished now! I AM SPEECHLESS 😶
Ekamnyaay@ekamnyaay

▪️Punjab and Haryana HC directed a 22-year-old engineering student to pay ₹2,500 interim maintenance to his 31-year-old wife, observing that a husband has a legal duty to maintain his wife and cannot evade this responsibility merely on the ground of being a student. ▪️On facts, the husband argued that the marriage took place in June 2020 under compelling circumstances when he was a minor (16 years and 4 months old), while the wife was 25 years old. The couple had no children, and he later sought annulment under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act in 2023. ▪️He further contended that he was a full-time student with no independent source of income and that his family survived solely on his mother’s ₹3,000 widow pension. It was also argued that the wife was not destitute, as she resided with her earning family members. ▪️Rejecting these submissions, High Court reiterated that Section 125 CrPC is a social justice measure aimed at preventing destitution and vagrancy. It is not punitive in nature but ensures basic subsistence for a dependent spouse. ▪️Relying on Supreme Court’s ruling in Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan, Court noted that pleas of unemployment or lack of income are often “bald excuses” and do not absolve a husband of his legal duty, especially if he is able-bodied and capable of earning. ▪️Court observed that the husband was healthy and capable of earning, and noted that even a daily wage labourer earns around ₹12,000–₹13,000 per month. ▪️Considering rising living costs, Court held that ₹2,500 per month is minimal and justified, and accordingly dismissed the revision petition filed by the husband against the order of Family Court, Faridabad. #Mentoo #HighCourt #Maintenance #law #student

English
53
336
1.2K
27K
rakesh retweetet
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj@DeepikaBhardwaj·
He was just a 16 year 4 months old boy when he had to marry this 25 year old woman under compulsion He filed for annulment of marriage She sought maintenance from him He told the court he's an engineering student dependent on pension of his widow mother himself He is 22 year old today and the woman is 31 But the court said even a daily wage labourer earns 12K, 18K so why can't he and that being a student is no excuse not to pay maintenance Widow pension his mother receives is 3000 Maintenance he now needs to pay is 2500. Which means he must earn while attending his college. But this 31 year old woman can't as per our courts Absolutely the GREATEST laws of our country @ekamnyaay
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj tweet media
English
114
451
1.2K
31.2K
rakesh retweetet
Sanjay Singh AAP
Sanjay Singh AAP@SanjayAzadSln·
जरा ध्यान से सुनिए जज मा. स्वर्ण कांता शर्मा जी को क्यों इस केस से खुद को अलग कर लेना चाहिए। ये तो सिर्फ एक कारण है ऐसे कई कारण @ArvindKejriwal जी ने कोर्ट को बताया। क्या आपको याद है इन्ही न्यायमूर्ति महोदया ने ED के हक़ में क्या फैसला दिया था?
हिन्दी
221
4.2K
14.9K
247.1K
rakesh retweetet
Chetan
Chetan@cskkanu·
पतियों के खून का क़तरा कतरा बेच देंगे, ऐसे जज !
Chetan tweet media
हिन्दी
11
70
124
2.9K
rakesh
rakesh@rakeshkumar095·
@LiveLawIndia @nupur_0111 no doubt,kanta sharma is biased judiciary is compromised we need judiciary reform and jidge accountable for their actions ,and even ability to put them behind bars
English
0
0
2
77
rakesh retweetet
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️
This happens only in Indian Judiciary. A judge judge himself/herself and decides upon his/her own acts. Thanks to our wonderful collegium system.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ tweet media
English
9
70
158
1.8K
rakesh retweetet
Chetan
Chetan@cskkanu·
Warning ⚠️ ⚠️ ⚠️ If you give alimony as settlement amount then also she can demand maintenance after compromise.
Chetan tweet media
English
15
81
143
2.8K
rakesh retweetet
Aradhya
Aradhya@AradhyaSntni·
Bruh 😭
Aradhya tweet media
English
42
308
2.4K
20.1K
rakesh retweetet
4PM News Network
4PM News Network@4pmnews_network·
#BREAKING: UP से करीब 2 करोड़ वोटर के नाम काट दिए। SIR Phase 2 के बाद आंकड़े आए सामने। जिनके नाम कटे, उन्हें जवाब कौन देगा? जिन वैलिड वोटर के नाम कटे उनकी जवाबदेही कौन लेगा? विपक्ष ने चुनाव आयोग पर उठाए बड़े सवाल
4PM News Network tweet media
हिन्दी
6
120
221
1.8K
rakesh retweetet
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️
Men should avoid and actually boycott sitting in mediations with immediate effect until such orders are reversed. Whats the use to sit in mediation when they forcefully break the contracts illegally in favor of women?
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️ tweet media
English
6
57
100
1.1K
rakesh retweetet
rakesh retweetet
Shoonya
Shoonya@Shoonya_ydv·
‘कुछ चीज़ें ऐसी होती हैं जो प्राइवेट रहे तो ही अच्छी लगती हैं, वरना लोग तमाशा बना देते हैं' मेरठ के पूर्व जज साहब ने तो अपनी बेटी के तलाक़ को लेकर तो पूरा रायता ही फ़ैला दिया है. अब उन लोगों पर कार्रवाई करने की धमकी दे रहे हैं जो लोग ससुराल पक्ष के द्वारा लगाए आरोप को सामने रख रहे हैं. तलाक़ होने के बाद गाजे-बाजे के साथ बेटी को ससुराल से वापस लेकर आए तो ख़ूब वाहवाही हुई लेकिन जब लड़की के ससुर ने लड़की की करतूतें सबके सामने रखी तो लड़की के जज पिता सुप्रीम कोर्ट जाने की धमकी दे रहें हैं. लड़की पर ससुराल पक्ष ने आरोप लगाया था कि लड़की पक्ष वालों का हस्तक्षेप अधिक था, बच्चा होने पर मुंडन संस्कार में ससुराल पक्ष वालों को पूछा नहीं गया!
Shoonya tweet mediaShoonya tweet media
हिन्दी
50
93
358
17.2K
rakesh retweetet
𝕂𝕂
𝕂𝕂@Try2StopME·
Public ne strong & independent psychologist ko rula diya. Uske bechare ex judge papa ko bhi nahi baksha. 😂 Public should keep exposing wrong doers like them.
English
113
404
1.7K
39.5K
rakesh retweetet
rakesh retweetet
AajTak
AajTak@aajtak·
ट्रोलिंग से टूटीं मेरठ की प्रणिता, रिटायर्ड जज पिता बोले- तलाक के बाद बेटी को सदमे से निकालने के लिए बजाए थे ढोल Pranita Meerut Divorce Case: मेरठ की प्रणिता और उनके पिता रिटायर्ड जज ज्ञानेंद्र शर्मा का मामला अब एक कानूनी और सामाजिक विवाद में बदल गया है. तलाक के बाद 'ढोल-नगाड़ों' के साथ बेटी का स्वागत करने वाले वीडियो के वायरल होने के बाद सोशल मीडिया पर प्रणिता को काफी ट्रोल किया जा रहा है, जिससे उनका मानसिक तनाव और बढ़ गया है. पूरी खबर : intdy.in/oc3h4m #Meerut #PranitaCase #SocialMediaTrolling #MentalHealthAwareness #DivorceCase #ViralVideo
AajTak tweet media
हिन्दी
188
73
524
102.7K
rakesh retweetet
ShoneeKapoor
ShoneeKapoor@ShoneeKapoor·
16 Years Apart, Still No Exit: SC Denies Divorce, Continues Financial Burden on Husband A man lives separately for 16 years, pays maintenance regularly, yet is denied closure through divorce. The Court places emphasis on continued payment and possible settlement rather than recognising prolonged breakdown. This reflects how, in practice, extended separation and financial strain may still not translate into legal relief for men in matrimonial disputes. TO READ EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAID, CLICK HERE:👇 shoneekapoor.com/legal-news/mai… #SupremeCourt #498AMisuse #FalseCases #AlimonyBurden #MaintenanceAbuse #LegalAwareness #BiasedLaws #ViralNews
ShoneeKapoor tweet media
English
12
39
75
1.9K