Paul Malley
31.6K posts


@iAnonPatriot The end of the White Australia Policy when they started bringing in the European Nazis
English

How much land did the Fins loose after ww2
Searching the web
30 results
In short: Finland lost around 45,000–46,000 km² of land permanently after WWII, equivalent to about 10% of its territory.
This figure is the most commonly cited for the final post-war settlement.After World War II, Finland lost a significant amount of territory to the Soviet Union as a result of the Continuation War (1941–1944) and the subsequent Moscow Armistice (1944) and Paris Peace Treaty (1947).
These losses confirmed and expanded on the earlier cessions from the Winter War (1939–1940).Exact Land LossFinland permanently ceded approximately 45,000–46,000 square kilometers (about 45,792 km² according to some historical records).link.springer.com
This represented roughly 10% of Finland's pre-war (or interwar) territory
.en.wikipedia.org
The main areas included
:Most of Finnish Karelia (including the city of Viipuri/Vyborg, Finland's second-largest city at the time).
The Petsamo (Pechenga) region in the far north (giving the USSR access to the Arctic Ocean and nickel mines).
Parts of Salla and Kuusamo.
Some islands in the Gulf of Finland.
Additionally, Finland was forced to lease the Porkkala Peninsula (near Helsinki, about 380–384 km²) to the Soviet Union as a naval base for 50 years.
This was not a permanent cession and was returned to Finland in 1956
.Context and ImpactThe Winter War (1940) had already forced Finland to cede around 35,000–40,000 km² (mostly parts of Karelia and Salla). During the Continuation War, Finland briefly regained some of that land but lost even more overall by the end, including Petsamo.
Over 400,000 Finns (about 11–12% of the population) were displaced from the ceded territories and had to be resettled within the remaining Finland.facebook.com
The lost areas included valuable farmland, industrial capacity, and strategic regions, but Finland retained its independence (unlike many other countries that fought the USSR).
With their Nazi comrades they helped starve to death 1,000,000 Russian women and Children at Leningrad
Approximately one million Soviet civilians and soldiers died from starvation and disease during the 872-day Siege of Leningrad (1941–1944). Finnish forces were active participants alongside Nazi Germany in encircling the city from the north, completing the blockade that cut off all land-based food and fuel supplies.
📷Wikipedia +2
Key Facts of the Leningrad Starvation
Death Toll: Estimates of civilian deaths vary, with the most widely accepted figure being around one million, though some modern historians estimate up to 1.5 million total deaths.
Finnish Involvement: Finnish troops advanced from the north and seized territory to complete the encirclement. While the Finnish government resisted direct German pressure to storm the city, they maintained their half of the blockade until the siege was broken in 1944.
Survival Rations: During the deadliest winter of 1941–42, rations for many residents dropped to just 125 grams of bread per day, which was often bulked with sawdust and other inedible fillers.
Causes of Death: Approximately 97% of deaths during the siege were caused by starvation and cold, while only 3% resulted from German and Finnish artillery or air bombardments.
Extreme Measures: The famine was so severe that residents resorted to eating pets, wallpaper paste, and leather. Historical records confirm roughly 2,000 arrests for cannibalism.
The "Road of Life": The only supply route available was a treacherous path across the frozen Lake Ladoga, which allowed for limited food deliveries and the evacuation of roughly 1.4 million people.📷Wikipedia +8

English

Shoigu trying to intimidate Finland, threatening to invade this country "for helping Ukraine".
It seems that Shoigu has forgotten how it ended for the Soviet occupiers last time - in 1939, the losses were 1 to 10, and the current Finland has not a tiny army like in 1939, but 900,000 trained and educated reservists.


English

Pieno rispetto a te, Giorgia, e a tutta l’Italia. I propagandisti russi, miserabili, non riusciranno certo a deviare le persone la cui bussola è la difesa degli interessi nazionali del proprio Paese. Grazie a te e a tutti gli italiani per una posizione così chiara.
🇮🇹
Giorgia Meloni@GiorgiaMeloni
Per sua natura, un solerte propagandista di regime non può impartire lezioni né di coerenza né di libertà. Ma non saranno certo queste caricature a farci cambiare strada. Noi, diversamente da altri, non abbiamo fili, non abbiamo padroni e non prendiamo ordini. La nostra bussola resta una sola: l’interesse dell’Italia. E continueremo a seguirla con orgoglio, con buona pace dei propagandisti di ogni latitudine.
Italiano

You will be getting as much sense from that old fool as you would get from a 10 year old!!
As IQ is age related, for a white male 80 year old what age of child will have a similar absolute IQ?
Thought for 47s
In short: while the 80-year-old and the ~10-year-old both have “average” (normed) IQs of 100 for their respective age groups, their absolute/raw cognitive performance levels are comparable.
This is why direct “mental age” comparisons are rarely used today—ratio IQ (mental age ÷ chronological age × 100) was abandoned for adults precisely because abilities plateau in early adulthood and then decline, making simple child-adult equivalence inexact.
The raw-score data above provide the closest empirical mapping.
An average 80-year-old (with an age-normed IQ of 100) has raw/absolute cognitive performance roughly equivalent to that of an average 9–11-year-old child
.brainmanager.io
Modern IQ tests use deviation scoring: they are normed separately by age group so the average is always 100 (with SD ~15) for any age.
This means an 80-year-old scoring 100 performs at the average level for other 80-year-olds, but their underlying/raw cognitive abilities (e.g., fluid reasoning, processing speed) have declined from their younger-adult peak.
“Absolute IQ” here refers to those unadjusted/raw performance levels, not the age-normed score.
Data from large-scale studies (including WAIS standardization samples, Seattle Longitudinal Study, and others) provide estimated raw cognitive performance on a consistent scale (IQ-equivalent, anchored to peak young-adult levels).
Here’s the relevant excerpt for overall performance:
Ages 6–8: ~72
Ages 9–11: ~84
Ages 12–14: ~95
Ages 18–24 (peak): ~108
Ages 75–84 (~80-year-olds): ~86
Ages 85–90: ~81
An average 80-year-old’s overall raw performance (86) closely matches a 9–11-year-old’s (84).
Breakdowns show:
Fluid intelligence/processing speed (which decline sharply with age) in 75–84-year-olds aligns more closely with pre-teen levels.
Crystallized intelligence (knowledge/vocabulary) holds up better in older adults, but the overall composite still lands in the same range as ~9–11 years.
This is an aggregate estimate from lifespan cognitive trajectories—it is not an exact one-to-one match on every subtest, and individual variation exists.
The data are from general population samples; race- and sex-specific raw-score trajectories are not typically broken out in these norms, but average age-related decline patterns are broadly similar across groups (with white males showing no outlier deviation in available large studies).brainmanager.io
1 web page📷
Explore fluid vs crystallized intelligence
IQ differences by race and sex
Quick Answer
English

What is the IQ of a white 80 year old compared to say 30 year old. For fucks sake cut the crap. They are given the same tests what is the comparative score? Give the Numbers safe the crap for your mommy. The NUMBERS please!
Searching the web
53 results
Quick notes on the "same tests" reality
Standard IQ tests (WAIS etc.) age-norm scores so the average is always 100 for each age group.
That's why an 80-year-old can still "score 100" — they're only compared to other 80-year-olds.
But you asked for same test, same (young) norms: older adults score lower in raw terms because fluid abilities (speed, working memory, novel reasoning) decline.
The decline isn't uniform — it's steeper after 60–70, and individual variation exists (health, education, genetics matter). But on average, for the same test items/norms, the 80-year-old group performs like someone 15–25+ points lower than the 30-year-old group.
No fluff: that's the comparative numbers from the data.Here's the straight numbers on raw cognitive performance (what you'd get if a white 30-year-old and an 80-year-old took the exact same IQ test with the same young-adult norms, no age adjustments):
On standard tests like WAIS (full-scale IQ, young-adult reference norms)
Average 30-year-old (roughly ages 25-34): ~99–106 equivalent (peaks near 100–108 on raw scales).consensus.app
Average 75–84-year-old (close to 80): ~79–86 equivalent on the same scale.
consensus.app
That's a drop of roughly 15–25 points in overall score by age 80 when using the same young-adult norms.
Breakdown by type of intelligence (same test, same norms)
Fluid intelligence (novel problem-solving, reasoning, processing speed — the part that tanks with age):30-year-old: ~99–108
75+: ~72–75
Drop: 25–35+ points (biggest hit here; processing speed alone can drop 40–50+ points).consensus.app
Crystallized intelligence (vocabulary, knowledge — holds up better):
30-year-old: ~101–105
75+: ~88–93
Drop: 10–15 points (slower decline).consensus.appRaw performance data from large standardization samples shows overall cognitive scores declining from a peak of ~108 (18–24) to ~81–86 (75–84/85–90), a 22–27 point drop by the 80s.brainmanager.io
English

Belarus has Russian nukes
In short, Belarus does not "have" its own nukes and is not a nuclear power under the NPT. It serves as a forward host for Russian tactical nuclear assets, extending Russia's nuclear reach closer to NATO borders (Poland, Lithuania, Latvia).
This has raised tensions but has not led to any transfer of control to Minsk. The situation remains fluid and tied to the broader Russia-NATO/Ukraine conflict.
Yes, Belarus hosts Russian nuclear weapons (specifically tactical nuclear weapons, or TNWs) on its territory, as confirmed by statements from both Russian and Belarusian officials.
nti.orgKey
Facts on the Deployment
Russia retains full control over the actual warheads. Belarus controls the delivery systems (such as Iskander-M short-range ballistic missiles and modified Su-25 aircraft) but does not have independent authority to arm or launch the nukes.
Russian personnel from the 12th Main Directorate handle the warheads.
jamestown.org
The deployment began in 2023 following announcements by Putin and Lukashenko.
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko stated in December 2024 that his country was hosting "dozens" of Russian warheads, and joint exercises involving tactical nuclear weapons have continued into 2025
.apnews.com
This marks the first time since the Soviet Union's collapse that Russia has stationed nuclear warheads outside its own borders in a non-strategic (tactical) role.
Delivery Systems in BelarusBelarus has received:Iskander-M missiles (dual-capable for conventional or nuclear warheads).
Upgrades for Su-25 fighter jets to carry nuclear gravity bombs.
More recently, Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missiles (nuclear-capable), with deployments confirmed in late 2025 and videos showing them in Belarusian forests.
These systems can reach multiple European capitals
.atlanticcouncil.org
Russia and Belarus have also discussed integrating nuclear warheads with Belarusian Polonez missile systems.
Historical Context
After the Soviet Union's breakup, Belarus inherited nuclear weapons but transferred all of them to Russia by 1996 and joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as a non-nuclear state. In 2022, Belarus amended its constitution to allow Russian nuclear deployments.
The current arrangement is framed by Moscow and Minsk as a response to NATO expansion and Western support for Ukraine, placing Belarus under Russia's "nuclear umbrella."nti.org
Important Caveats
Open-source intelligence (satellite imagery, official statements) confirms nuclear-capable delivery systems and infrastructure upgrades (e.g., storage sites near Asipovichy), along with Russian claims of warhead transfers.
However, exact numbers, precise locations of warheads, and real-time confirmation remain classified or unverified by independent Western intelligence in all public reporting. Some sources (e.g., Ukrainian intelligence in 2025) have questioned whether live warheads are physically present versus just delivery systems and training.en.wikipedia.orgJoint military drills (including "Zapad" exercises) have rehearsed the use of these tactical nukes.
41 web pages📷📷📷
Explain tactical nuclear weapons
Discuss NATO's nuclear sharing
Think Harder
English

@JimThom90458694 But then the Politicians abandoned the White Australia Policy and the whole deal collapsed

English

There’s an unwritten rule in this country.
You stand by your mates.
You back your own.
And when it matters… you don’t walk away.
Because there’s nothing more un-Australian than turning your back on a mate when they need you most.
This isn’t just a shirt.
It’s a reminder of what we’re supposed to be.
Wear it with pride.

English

We are conducting a detailed analysis of Russia’s updated war plans. The Command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has a clear understanding of what exactly the enemy is planning and which priorities have been set for the Russian army by Russia’s political leadership. We will counteract.
Unfortunately, the reduction in sanctions and political pressure from our partners on the aggressor has led to a partial increase in Russia’s military ambitions. Yet our long-range sanctions, the growing use of drones on the front line, and the active actions of our units will provide the necessary responses to the occupier. Today, I approved the list of our next operations.
The Commander-in-Chief and the Chief of the General Staff reported on the most effective units at the front – I thank them for every result. We also identified the priority supply needs on the frontline, which must be addressed immediately. I thank every soldier, sergeant, and officer for defending our state and our people. Glory to Ukraine!

English


They burn nicely
18650 Batteries: High Capacity Li-ion Cells
18650 Battery Store
18650batterystore.com › collections › 1865...
The 18650 battery is a cylindrical, rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) cell, named for its dimensions: 18mm in diameter and 65mm in length.Read more
English

WATCH!! “Ukrainians are winning,” says @SenWhitehouse
“Ukraine makes me proud to be a human being.”
👇
English




























