angel

@Saralovesvox because he is stupid 🩷

Why does Vox only use his wires to elevate himself but not these badass light blue repulsors

*says something so embarrassing that i curl up and begin to molt* *gesturing at my discarded exoskeleton* was that guy bothering you

@ringoversity sorry m drrunk right now

@ringoversity kill the guy that likes you

@josiahhughes @AppleSupport white people be like im flirting with my grandpa

@ringoversity mmmyurder

MY POOR LITTLE SAD KITTY AAWWUUHHHHH

we should ban teenagers from ALL media. and then on their 16th birthday they are brought to a theatre to be shown a movie of a train coming directly at them to see if they react and flee in horror like they did in 1896

i'm halfway through i HATE THISSS why did i think it it was a good idea to pack 200g of green peas for lunch omfg i'm so stupid

@voxvangogh @RetroBettyO he's the tung tung of hazbin

@RetroBettyO alastor is the entire world’s oc at this point. a different version of him lives in each and every one of us. wow ❤️

i find it interesting that alastor is canonically just a faker and we have no knowledge of his true self and yet HE'S the one the fandom decides to be the most strict about?? "he can't be this he can't like that" bro we don't know this man at all he literally can be anything😭

SIZE DIFFEREENCEEEEUHHH

@igsekai depends on when it issss

How many of ya’ll will watch an art stream? (Just wanna know. For no particular reason at all :b)

Ele se segurando pra não chorar mas desabando justamente quando o husk toca nele com delicadeza pqp eles me deixam doente

Mass non-compliance is the only way to end this. Pass it on.

Age verification doesn't protect kids, it's being pushed for mass surveillance.

Look closely at what the government is promising you here (published 15th June). They claim that if your account is over 16 years old, you are safe from the dragnet. But then comes the casual, insidious trap: if you do have to prove your age, they say it will be 'as simple as a facial recognition check.' Do not let that soft language fool you. 'As simple as a face scan' means surrendering the unchangeable, mathematical architecture of your human identity. Here is the brutal reality: this is a biometric harvesting operation masquerading as child safety. Your biometrics - your face, your irises, your unique biological signature - are the most sensitive pieces of data you possess. If a password leaks, you reset it. If your biometric blueprint is hacked, leaked, or scraped into a government database, your identity is compromised for life. They are normalising the idea that you must scan your body just to access the public square. It is the ultimate blueprint for a permanent digital cage. Once your biological data is stored in their centralised databases (which it will be) your privacy is dead forever. You aren't just logging into an app - you are voluntarily handing over the keys to a corporate and state surveillance engine. An app-level 'under 16s ban' is universally recognised by security experts as unpoliciable and structurally broken. Following the mass backlash from tech companies, the UK government reconsidered its stance... But this is what they're not telling you - something we have warned you about for years. The UK Gov already appointed an expert panel to 'fast-track' a national, official Digital ID scheme earlier this year, that will (despite their current lies) eventually serve as the master credential to 'solve the problem' with an unenforceable 'under 16s social media ban.' It has NEVER been about Children's safety. Ever. So, to coerce compliance of all UK adults, we will soon see the beginning of another textbook manufactured crisis. Do not be fooled by the ongoing political theatre. The predictable failure of this ban is completely by design. As the system intentionally glitches, the media will flood the headlines with weaponised fear - amplifying stories of online horror and grooming to rile up panicked parents. Once again, they are engineering a crisis of fear so severe that the public will ultimately beg for the exact Digital ID grid they would have otherwise rejected. Cast your mind back to September 2025: 'mass illegal migration' didn't work as an excuse for Digital ID, did it? So the Epstein Class now use Children's safety as the excuse. By wrapping the digital credential inside the emotionally charged issue of child safety, dissent is effectively silenced. Anyone arguing against the tracking framework is politically painted as being against child protection. gov.uk/government/pub…

Don’t take it from me. Take it from one of the internet’s greatest pioneers @jimmy_wales

its dystopian to force people to submit personal info to use a phone THEY paid for with THEIR ADULT MONEY

STARTING A SYSTEM DIARY HAS BEEN SOOO HELPFUL LITERALLY A DIARY BUT YOU WRITE WHOS FRONTING TOO AND WHAT YOURE THINKING !!!! #systwt PLEAAASE

I like how people are calling others who are against the social media ban pedos maybe I want the internet to actually have some privacy. maybe I want parents to do their jobs instead of just letting the government walk all over them. Grow up and realize it's not for child safety