Angehefteter Tweet
Saying anti-Zionism is automatically hatred of Jews incorrectly equates a political ideology with an entire people. Zionism is a nationalist project. Jews are a diverse religious and cultural community with all kinds of political views.
Plenty of Jews support Zionism. Plenty criticize it. Some reject it entirely. And plenty of Christian Zionists strongly support it too. So Zionism isn’t just synonymous with ‘the Jewish people’. Calling all opposition to Zionism antisemitic, assumes Jewish identity is reducible to *one* political position. This erases both dissenting Jews (that have historically and today rejected or criticised Zionism on theological, ethical or political grounds) and non-Jewish Zionists. Ultimately, saying anti-Zionism is by definition Jew hatred ignores the aforementioned diversity & declares certain Jewish viewpoints illegitimate or self-hating, which is problematic.
Also, I am glad you brought up Marr because I think it shows why this distinction matters. Marr created the term ‘antisemitism’ to make hostility toward Jews sound modern + scientific, rather than religious. But the point is that Marr targeted Jews *as a people*, not based on what they believed or did. That’s the core of antisemitism (attacking Jews for who they are, not for their politics).
Criticism of Zionism or of the policies of the State of Israel, however sharp, concerns political structures, laws, borders & power. It targets an ideology or a state, NOT Jewish identity itself. Some people can make remarks that cross over to antisemitic territory. But the possibility of abuse does not render all critique abusive by definition.
Yes, some people use ‘Zionist’ as a slur. That should definitely be called out. But insisting that the term can never be used in good faith, is to assume bad faith in advance and foreclose the possibility of principled disagreements. This, in effect, shields a political ideology (Zionism) from scrutiny. I can think of no other nationalist ideology that’s treated as inseparable from the total identity of a global religious or ethnic community. Singling out this one for such treatment reinforces the idea that Jews everywhere are politically monolithic, which simply isn’t true.
I genuinely believe that expanding antisemitism to include opposition to Zionism will have the undesired effect of diluting the term. It may also penalise legitimate speech by academics, journalists, activists and ordinary people, who want to debate questions of nationalism, minority rights, borders, or international law. It’s important for the distinction between identity and ideology to be maintained, so that we can have open political discourse and free democratic debate.
English
