Stella Rimbaud

Can someone explain to me like I'm a child, why undocumented, foreign men who have broken in to our country, are allowed to walk the streets unsupervised?

@Jenny_1884 @SilentReturns I'm announcing those working in Britain will now have to work until at least 85 years old.. Some of our 'new arrivals' have expensive tastes, some are bringing their extended family to the UK.. & a lot of them end up in prison, which is costing us a fkn fortune..

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

@lillai23 Well you sbouldn't.

Fun fact: I qualify for UC on a nurse‘s fulltime salary in London Maybe tough love the super wealthy & tax them more to pay the rest of us better wages

So apart from trying to give away the Chagos islands. Recognising Palestine. 13 ministerial resignations. Showing full confidence in Morgan McSweeney, Peter Mandelson, Sue Gray and Lord Ali. Blaming the far right for an island of strangers. 16 Policy U turns and rising. Having no operable warships. Not smashing the gangs. Approving a huge Chinese embassy in London. Spending 23 seconds laying a wreath in Southport only to rush back to a drinks party. Appointing an anti Muslim hostility tsar. Raising income tax. Raising inheritance tax. Raising national insurance. Raising capital gains tax, Raising council tax. Raising value added tax. Raising mansion tax. Increasing welfare spending and the minimum wage whilst freezing tax allowances. Scrapping jury trials. The only boat he has stopped is HMS dragon from crossing the channel. What has Starmer really achieved apart from breakfast clubs and the decay of our country?

@trwsenti I wish my council tax was £2300 a year 🫤

Your council tax is £2,300 a year. On top of income tax and NI every month. They collect bins every 2 weeks (if you're lucky), haven't fixed the pothole outside your house in 4 years, and just closed the library down the road to save money. Meanwhile the average NHS wait is 18 weeks, GP bookings are 3 weeks out, and A&E regularly runs 8+ hours. You're paying for services that don't exist anymore.

The pound has lost 69% of its purchasing power since 2000. A loaf of bread that cost 50p now costs £1.40. A pint that cost £2 now costs £6. A house that cost £80,000 now costs £280,000. Your wages did not keep up. Nothing you did caused this. They printed. You paid. And they are about to do it again. You and your children will work harder for less forever to pay back decades of government incompetence.

I don't believe this. Especially since she got the anti-semite flag in her bio.

🚨 THIS CANNOT BE HOW RUFUS’S STORY ENDS 🚨 Rufus is shutting down… 💔 Nearly 10 years old 💔 A lifetime in a shelter 💔 Still waiting… still overlooked Be the reason Rufus finally leaves the shelter… not in silence, but in love ❤️ APPLY HERE: pawprints2freedom.co.uk/adopt

Izzard proving he’s one of the girls by turning up for a work related interview in a tiny tennis skirt, the staple of every 64 year old woman’s wardrobe 🙄 #SmellsLikeAGP

@TheNorskaPaul Loving those flesh coloured tights. No self-respecting woman would be seen dead in those.

Eddie ‘Susie’ Izzarard has attended the opening of the Rother Valley Railway in Sheffield for some reason.😮😃🚂 Susie, who is in his 60’s, decided to dress as a butch Martina Navratilova in à cutesy tennis skirt & carrying timber worthy of a Sheffield steel worker in his homage.👌 In his cosplay of a woman, older ladies wear sport skirts, denim & fake boobs.🤨🥴

Looking to get involved with your local Restore Britain branch? If you want to get involved locally, find your branch through this link. restorebritain.org.uk/branches Aberdeen City branches soon, it’s being updated every day. If your area is not up and running yet, it will be soon!

Let's be real about who votes for the SNP - Anglophobes, dole scroungers, criminals, workshy, wee neds, Celtic FC supporters, feather-bedded public sector, Islamists, corrupt businessmen, deluded dreamers.

@WalterWhite444 @IDS_Falkirk2 Seems fairly comprehensive 👍

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Glasgow patriots - Lend Craig your vote on 7 May Craig is as close as you will get to a Restore Britain candidate right now in Glasgow I’ve met the man and can vouch that what you see is exactly what you get

@gavcoEBT1978 @GraemetsmithT @theSNP Yeah it is for the mentally deficient cousins.

@GraemetsmithT @theSNP Family voting IS a thing then?....

My family are voting for the SNP ⁦@theSNP⁩ on the 7th May 2026!

@JamesMelville Good. A bit more of this from you and less of Israel's supposed misdemeanours.

Sudan: As Sudan’s civil war enters its fourth year: ▪️More than nine million people remain displaced in Sudan. ▪️29 million face acute hunger. ▪️ The conflict has claimed an estimated 150,000 lives. A humanitarian catastrophe.

@MattCas04807118 They're always fat 🤷🏻‍♀️

A baby rapist hung himself in prison. Sorry for the sad news. Robin Hollyson was 31 and given 24 years to serve when he took the cowardly way out after previously being a monster. One less I suppose.

@CamillaTominey @Phil_Osophi As much as 16%?

YouGov: Only 16% of Britons think Starmer has been honest about Mandelson appointment

@LizKershawDJ @Woldslinx So sorry Liz. Another staple of my youth gone 😕

Thank you for all your messages of affection for Our Andtew and kindness today. I’ve lost my best friend

Starmer Sacked the Man Who Followed the Rules. Keir Starmer did not sack Sir Olly Robbins because he did something wrong. He sacked him because he did something inconvenient. That distinction matters more than anything else that has happened this week, and this has been a week of considerable consequence. Ciaran Martin, former head of the National Cyber Security Centre and a man with direct professional knowledge of how the vetting system operates, went on the record yesterday to say that Robbins had not only no duty to inform Downing Street of Mandelson's vetting failure, he had a positive duty not to. The system is designed that way deliberately. Security vetting exists at arm's length from political authority precisely to prevent ministers from interfering in assessments that should be made on security grounds alone. Robbins followed the rules. Starmer dismissed him anyway. What Starmer has done is construct a causal chain that does not exist. The argument being assembled in Downing Street runs as follows: Robbins overruled the security services, Robbins did not tell us, and therefore we bear no responsibility for what followed. Every part of that argument is false. The decision to appoint Mandelson was Starmer's. He made it before vetting was complete. He made it in full knowledge of the Epstein connection. He made it because his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, a protégé of Mandelson, pushed for it despite institutional warnings. The vetting failure did not cause the appointment. The appointment came first. Starmer signed it off and the vetting process, working exactly as designed, subsequently said no. The sacrifice of Robbins also destroys what remains of Starmer's own defence. He has spent months insisting that process failed him, that he was deceived, that the system let him down. A former head of the National Cyber Security Centre has now said publicly that there was no process failure. The system worked. Which means the problem was never process. The problem was judgment. Starmer's judgment, exercised before the process had even concluded. Consider what the dismissal means for Whitehall. Every senior civil servant in every department now understands the lesson. Following established procedure will not protect you if the political consequences prove embarrassing. Correct conduct is no defence against a Prime Minister who needs a fall guy. The chilling effect on institutional independence will outlast this government and this scandal. Starmer has not just sacrificed one official. He has sent a message to the entire senior civil service about what loyalty to process is actually worth. Meanwhile the documents withheld from Parliament grow more suspicious by the day. The government will not say how many it is concealing. It will not describe their general type. It will not explain why their release would prejudice any future prosecution beyond asserting that it would. Sir Michael Ellis, a former Attorney General and criminal barrister of seventeen years standing, has said publicly that the prosecution argument is nonsense, that the test for contempt requires a substantial risk of serious prejudice that the existing wall of media coverage has already made effectively impossible to meet. A government with nothing to hide does not hide things it cannot explain. A Prime Minister with clean hands does not sack the civil servant whose hands were cleanest. Robbins told friends he would not be the fall guy. He was made one regardless. Starmer called the vetting failure a failing of the state. The man who followed the state's rules lost his job the same day. The public can see what that is. They have a word for it. So does the Ministerial Code. Keir Starmer and Olly Robbins