vlasto

@Airaasayss 22

How many people are still in the room🤔🤔 Think you can solve this???

@Arden_2210 2

Looks Easy but it's not Difficulty "Challging"

@Airaasayss White of course 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

Read very carefully!!!!! And look Closely before before You answer......🤔🤔

@MedvedevRussiaE Nobody is afraid of you, you clown.

Russian Defense Ministry’s statement must be taken literally: the list of European facilities which make drones & other equipment is a list of potential targets for the Russian armed forces. When strikes become a reality depends on what comes next. Sleep well, European partners!

@OldMoravid ???

Is Czech Republic safe for solo traveling as a Jewish woman ? 🧍‍♀️ would love to hear

@visegrad24 Hang on, something doesn’t quite add up here. Security firms are commercial organisations, which provide security services for money. Who are their paying clients? This sounds more like an excuse to get guns legally. The moment people start forming militias, civil war is not far.

A “security group” around the Rusholme and Victoria Park area near Manchester Central Mosque has decided to start their own security firm. “Manchester Community Watch” started as a WhatsApp group for reporting “unjust behavior” against minorities. It quickly grew to over 130 verified recruits through a strict ID + selfie verification process to keep out bad actors. The group has now applied for Security Industry Authority licences so they can operate legally as a private security firm.

@DivinelyDesined … temperatures were wrong. Not only is the evolution distinctly possible, once you see the sheer amount of trials and errors involved, but it is also the only plausi le explanation.

@DivinelyDesined … perishing quickly, some thriving with substantially more offspring than others. Successful errors combining in children, less successful ones eradicated by time and change. Earth 200M years ago would not be unsurvivable for today’s fauna. Air was not breathable…

Here is why The Theory of Evolution fails. At some point in the evolutionary past, organs like livers, brains, eyes, etc did not exist. They had to "evolve" into existence. The origin of these novel organs would require brand new, never before seen genetic sequences (DNA segments) to code for novel proteins, which would need to be engineered into novel biological machines, which are then combined with other machines to facilitate system-wide function. This also requires MORE genetic sequences to help with regulation, development, placement, guidance, timing, etc. Are you starting to see the problems? It's not just one change at a time adding up over eons. It's a whole coordinated host of changes that must take place. But this simply does not happen. Evolutionary mechanisms do not construct novel coordinated systems. Many experiments have tried to produce or observe organisms creating novel biological structures through evolutionary mechanisms, and they all fail. Every single one. Either they observe pre-existing parts being reused or optimized for some task, or they see mutations destroying or removing things. What we don't see is any progress towards novel systems. No novel proteins, no novel cell types, no novel genetic sequences...nothing that evolutionary theory requires. Unless evolutionists can present that data, the theory fundamentally fails. Evolution optimizes what exists; it doesn't construct new things. Only intelligence invents novel functional coordinated systems.

If you are longing for a simpler time that is now gone forever, this video will likely hit HARD… 🥲

A while back, I learned something mindblowing about the geological history of the Mediterranean Sea, and I just can't get it out of my head. Now I'm going to make it *your* problem too. Sorry. Hang onto your hat. This gets wild. 1/

@cirnosad You’re full of shit, as always.

@NiqabNancy Enough of this bullshit. You can’t possibly be this ignorant. I could think about 6 cases that prove you wrong in 5 seconds. Where I come from, we have this saying: “A converted Turk is worse than a Turk born”. It describes the root cause of your mental state really well.

Pure evil that US and Israel are striking Iran during Ramadan. When have Muslims ever attacked another religious group during their holidays??

@IrynaVoichuk I almost started feeling jubilant…

Breaking: Trump has announced that the US will close the sky over Ukraine and provide Tomahawks to strike russian military facilities. The decision takes effect on February 29 and 30.

What an idiot.

@Microinteracti1 Actually, the worst thing is this: ZSU/AFU, whatever is left of it (and it would be considerable, entire armies are rarely completely obliterated these days) would suddenly fight on the wrong side of the front line.

Scenario: Ukraine’s Front Collapses Ukraine’s front lines suddenly give way. The news hits like a physical shock, and panic spreads fast. Within days, millions of people move west. Roads jam. Trains overflow. Border crossings seize up. Entire families arrive with whatever they could carry. With defenses broken, Russia gains open corridors toward Kyiv and Lviv, and the unthinkable becomes plausible: the occupation of all Ukraine. Europe’s Dilemma As the nightmare unfolds, Europe runs out of comfortable options. A refugee crisis on this scale would dwarf the 2022 exodus. Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, and Moldova would be hit simultaneously and at full force. Border infrastructure would buckle. Reception systems would break. Humanitarian capacity would be stretched past the point where competence even matters. Then the bitter question arrives. Should we have done more? European leaders would face pressure from every direction at once. Anger from voters worried about capacity, jobs, housing, and social cohesion. Fury from those who warned for years that half measures were the most expensive strategy of all. And a growing sense that the West helped Ukraine enough to keep it fighting, but not enough to let it win. The Strategic Shockwave Analysts would immediately map the consequences. If Russia occupies Ukraine, the war machine does not slow down. It accelerates. Moscow would put the entire system into overdrive. Defense factories would expand at wartime tempo. Freshly produced armor, drones, missile systems, and modernized artillery would flow west. Units hardened by combat experience would be redeployed to the new frontier with Europe. The new line would not be theoretical. It would be real, fortified, and manned by troops who have spent years fighting a large scale war. The same transformation would unfold in Belarus. Russian forces would deepen their footprint, integrate command structures further, and turn Belarus into a forward military platform facing NATO. What is today a buffer would become a launch pad. Moldova would stand exposed. With Ukraine subdued, it would be a soft target. Political destabilization, hybrid pressure, and the constant shadow of force would make resistance fragile and costly. Russia could end up positioned along NATO’s entire eastern arc from the Baltics down to the Black Sea. The refugee burden would fuel political instability across Europe and hand extremists a ready made accelerant. Moscow would feel emboldened to intensify pressure and influence operations in Moldova, the Baltics, and the Balkans. The Cost Nobody Wanted to Pay The financial math would become unavoidable. Supporting Ukraine’s defense would suddenly look modest compared to the long term cost of hosting millions of refugees, ramping up defense spending with Russia now on the doorstep, absorbing economic disruption, and facing renewed energy coercion with Russia controlling more of Ukraine’s strategic resources. Poland and the Baltic states would be incandescent. They would argue, with reason, that Western European hesitation brought the Russian army closer, creating the very security emergency that Ukraine’s resistance had been holding back. Ukraine’s collapse would not end Europe’s Ukraine problem. It would harden it into something larger, more dangerous, and far more permanent. Europe would learn the same lesson too many people have been trying to teach all along: backing Ukraine was always the cheaper option. The tragedy is that this lesson would arrive only after it was too late to change the outcome. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

@FlyingBuckeye @thetripathi58 Even external recruiters would rather close a somewhat smaller deal than risk it all for extra 20% or so.

@thetripathi58 Interesting take considering the way most deals are structured, the recruiter makes more $ the higher the candidates salary is. Why would they cost themselves $?

The recruiter asks: "What are your salary expectations?" You give a number. Silence. The interview ends. Two days later, the offer is $15k less than you’re worth. You just fell into the "Anchor Trap." Stop costing yourself thousands. Say this instead:

@jaroslav73 Vlk. Páteř, hlava, pozice krku.

Teď vážně. Je tady nějaký odborník, který by z tohoto videa (není moje!) stopro určil, zda jde o vlka či ne…? Pls, pokud nedokážete odborně posoudit nebo odkázat na odborníka, zdržte se komentů. Dík 😉 RT potěší.

The Three Amigos. May happier times be upon us.

@ArmchairW And yet, katsaps, in their own words, send 40,000 new soldiers every month to Ukraine. And despite all that new manpower, the frontlines move only very little. And the army they are facing is so exhausted and thinned… I wonder where they are going wrong then 🤔

Both Stubb and Zelensky came out swinging at Davos with a fantasy claim of no fewer than 35,000 Russians killed in action last month - for context this would be more deadly than any given month on the Somme. As I pointed out earlier, nobody is dumb enough to believe this.⬇️ These are moronic, trivially debunked lies. There is no evidence at all supporting them. The only explanation I can offer for these increasingly deranged pronouncements is that our current crop of Western leaders know Ukraine is doomed and moreover doomed in the near future, and they are suffering a collective mental break and attempting to manifest an alternate reality - one where they remain the drivers of history and not the passengers - via magical utterances. This is a strong statement, but it should be realized that the Davos Regime's Russia policy is dependent on the maintenance of a reality-simulacrum created via all-consuming Ukrainian propaganda laundered through every outlet imaginable. This includes the capture of intelligence output at the highest levels imaginable - back in 2023 SACEUR was being briefed on raw brOSINT drivel, and there's no reason to believe the situation has improved in the interim. Countless decisions costing a million-plus lives, trillions of dollars in stolen prosperity, and the strategic integrity of the Davos project itself have been made based on carefully curated nonsense, all based on a catastrophically bad gamble that Russia will eventually collapse and all of these debts - moral, financial, and ultimately an epistemological deficit owed to reality itself - will be paid off. That has not happened and it will not happen, and thus we're seeing people with access to literal intelligence agencies retreat into fantasy as the cold - literally cold! - reality of inevitable Russian victory becomes clear. Although this may seem strange at first blush, this collective break with reality fits a long pattern of doomed national leaders throughout time. They will be awakened by the cold water of history soon enough. It occurs to me that Stubb in particular must be bitterly regretting the immense strategic blunder that Finland's leap into the arms of NATO - doubtless fueled by dreams of securing the 1939 borders and far more from a collapsing Russia - has truly been. Now the Finns stare death in the face across what was once a friendly border and the awful knowledge that, should it come to war, NATO's high command will happily feed their national future into a meatgrinder in a desperate attempt to draw a few Russian divisions off the Vistula front. 2026 will be the year of decision, friends. Russia has never been stronger, while Ukraine has exhausted not only its own able-bodied male population but NATO's financial and industrial ability to continue to support the conversion of that male population into military units and combat power. At this point the only question is when the Russians will feel comfortable enough in their military ascendancy to cave in the front line and end the war.