@BillAckman my feed is filled with spurs fans getting curb stomped, but okay
English
welt
5.9K posts
welt
@weltistic
building shit and judging shit business to advertise soon unless I get another job I hate ex msft | lockheed
Beigetreten Aralık 2024
221 Folgt187 Follower
@BlackedWifey @KillaKreww saying seinfeld as a show was good is fair - calling him a good actor is full on insane
English
@weltistic @KillaKreww no one think that about him lmao he one of the best actors
English
@RealCoryEdwards dont let the loudest / dumbest "pro ai" people speak for everyone.. obviously plot / story / vision should be driven by a human.
AI should be used for: feedback on uncertainty, bringing VFX / visuals from your mind to life, research / fact checking etc.
English
@adamcohenhillel @NarangShaurya I thought there was one coming about the Sama getting fired stuff, but with how fast AI is going why not just wait until AGI and make a movie about that
English
This is so poorly timed.
The public is currently on “AI is taking my job hysteria” not “social media is manipulating your brain” hysteria.
This looks like some ai trailer that I would see on Tik Tok for a movie.
Also Jermey strong looks nothing like zuck?
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm
First trailer for ‘THE SOCIAL NETWORK’ sequel, starring Jeremy Strong, Jeremy Allen White and Mikey Madison. The film follows an engineer who becomes a whistleblower on Facebook's most guarded secrets. In theaters on October 9.
English
@NarangShaurya fair but a lot of discourse around AI is heavily being steered by “social media is manipulating your brain”
it will always be relevant bc it’s how we consume ~all media now
English
@MorganBarrettX then why does his AI suck so badly?
think it’s time to accept the OGs are washed - the weirdo spent almost 100b on vr slop, and then just kept being CEO like nothing happened
English
Quarterly reminder that reality labs/metaverse was massive coverup
You really think Zuckerberg spent $84b on Wii style avatars and a virtual world???
Wake up sheeple - he was buying gpu’s and didn’t want people to know
English
Dario: fine we’ll stop lying to the fucking idiots
MTS@MTSlive
SITUATION UPDATE: Anthropic is reversing its Fable 5 policy of covertly degrading performance for competing AI researchers, per Wired.
English
so jarring being in year ~3 of AI and companies announcing “hey guys AI isn’t actually perfect all the time in every scenario, heads up!”
like no shit man, what have y’all been doing with it..?
Amazon Web Services@awscloud
More AI-generated code doesn't make your team faster. It might actually slow you down.
English
@theTSupdates the asterisks are geekin me out.. he’s not Voldemort man - fucks up with you people
English
why am i just noticing Sc**** Br*** behind her
English
Dario wants to legislatively stop anyone from competing with them
Dario Amodei@DarioAmodei
Today I'm publishing a new essay, Policy on the AI Exponential. AI is progressing extremely fast—much faster than the policy process was built to handle. The essay lays out where I think the technology is now, and the action needed to close the gap: darioamodei.com/post/policy-on…
English
Let the plebeians know we will say fuck you to their face rather than quitely. And no we will not explain why we are flagging frontier llm research or what constitutes as frontier research also we will make the guardrails even more ham fisted
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs
We’re rolling out changes to make Fable 5’s safeguards for frontier LLM development visible. Starting this week, flagged requests will visibly fall back to Opus 4.8—the same as our safeguards for cyber and bio. You will see this every time it happens. On the API, any flagged requests will return a reason for their refusal (coming to server-side fallback in the next few days). We wanted to deploy Fable 5 to our users quickly and safely. Visible safeguards can be probed, so they have to be robust, which takes time to get right. Invisible safeguards can be targeted more narrowly, allowing us to ship quickly with very few false positives. We went with invisible safeguards for this reason—and that was the wrong tradeoff. You should have visibility into the safeguards we have in place, and why. We’re sorry for not getting the balance right. Making the safeguards visible makes them easier to work around, so keeping them robust to jailbreaks will unfortunately mean more false positives while we improve the classifiers. We're also tuning our bio and cyber classifiers to trigger less often on harmless requests. We know this is frustrating and we’ll do our best to keep this period as short as possible. If you think a request has been mistakenly flagged: run /feedback in Claude Code, click thumbs-down on the fallback in Claude.ai or Cowork, or file the safeguard appeal form for API requests. Your reports help us tune these classifiers and we appreciate your feedback. support.claude.com/en/articles/82…
English
Wait why do chuds hate Milly Alcock now
I thought they'd be happy about a pretty blonde girl??
Jon Del Arroz | Sci-Fi And Fantasy@jondelarroz
Corporate asks you to find the difference between these pictures.
English
Knicks fans WAITED for the Spurs at their hotel and somebody threw something at Wemby and hit him
THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE MAN WTF
English
Accessibility is a good thing!
zerohedge@zerohedge
it's over *OPENAI MULLS SIGNIFICANT CUTS TO WHAT IT CHARGES FOR TOKENS: WSJ
English
@zerohedge 1. Chinese models are not remotely close to frontier models
2. The fact that you showed Gemini as an example means you know nothing about AI
3. Does your profile pic mean you’re a gay man or is that supposed to be cool?
English
Businesses are increasingly concluding that the value of the AI model is not worth the extravagant costs.
English
@thsottiaux pls tibo !
x.com/weltistic/stat…
welt@weltistic
openai can you please add multiple custom instructions (I can select top 5 or something from message bar similar to reasoning).. very annoying getting to a personality you like for instant / low thinking but then having to remove it for a research / pro type question
Filipino
Simplify until there is nothing to simplify
Adam Fry@adamhfry
We're making a small update to the model picker in ChatGPT! We know it's critical to a lot of people's work, and that we have a lot of paying users who care deeply about this one, so wanted to take some time to detail out the tweak. One important point upfront – you'll still have access to the same models and reasoning levels, besides the removal of thinking-light (used by less than 1% of our paid users). You'll see an updated list of options (similar to how Codex works): - Instant - Medium (Thinking-Standard) - High (Thinking-Extended) - Extra High (Thinking-Heavy) [for pro users] - Pro (with option to choose Pro-Standard or Pro-Extended) [for pro users] The intent is to make it easier to choose the balance of speed and effort that works best for your task. We also took into account community feedback to make sure: a) Thinking-heavy is easily accessible b) Pro standard and Pro extended are easily accessible c) We clearly communicate these changes Given that, here are some release notes detailing the updates - help.openai.com/chatgpt-releas…. Give it a try, it's rolling out today, and we're always open to feedback, we know it's important to get it right!
English