Marco Inaros

@unusual_whales All the millions of dimwits watching this shite smh

Donald Trump will lift the Fifa World Cup trophy with the winning team, per TSN

@visegrad24 Sounds totally made up if I'm honest.

Sarah Hildering van Lith, a non-Jewish Amsterdam-born music executive at Universal Music Group, says she fled the Netherlands for Israel after a wave of antisemitic threats, intimidation, and attacks following October 7. Hildering herself is also a terror attack survivor. On October 7, 2004, exactly 19 years before the Hamas massacre, Palestinian terrorists bombed the Taba Hilton in Sinai where she was staying as a teenager. She survived but permanently lost 60% hearing in one ear. Things escalated dramatically in March 2024. While unlocking her front door in Amsterdam, she says a Moroccan Muslim man approached her screaming: “Cancer Jew wh*re, I’m going to rape you.” Within seconds, two other Muslim men reportedly joined him after hearing the word “Jew.” Hildering believes she was targeted because she wore a Star of David necklace. She later described seeing Amsterdam radically change after October 7, saying her neighborhood became covered in Palestinian and Hamas flags. During an interfaith dialogue initiative backed by Amsterdam’s mayor, she says one Muslim cultural leader openly defended “jihad” as synonymous with the caliphate while others nodded in agreement. In another incident in May 2025, Hildering says a man driving beside her on an Amsterdam highway made a throat-slitting gesture, displayed Hamas imagery on his car, then allegedly tried to force her into a near-fatal crash while shouting “Allahu Akbar.” After moving to a Jewish neighborhood hoping to feel safer, her new home was burglarized in what she believes was a targeted attack. Around €30,000–€40,000 worth of valuables, heirlooms, jewelry, and Israel-related items were stolen. Neighbors reportedly captured footage of a van surveilling her home for days beforehand. “I thought I would grow old and die in Amsterdam. I never imagined myself fleeing my birth city for safety reasons.”

You totally misunderstand what is happening. US propaganda is highly successful. It has used Hollywood to brainwash the whole planet. The whole idea of exporting films and culture is so that foreigners will feel like Americans are nice, they look upon Americans with affection, they sympathize with Americans. It's all written and researched, and documented. You just have to go down the rabbit hole.

People of India trust Russia so much yet when it comes to entertainment, values, ideologies, norms, language & culture, they want to copy/emulate America 😂😂😂 All the anti-American/anti-Western rhetoric in India is a joke.

I haven't read The Hindu in 10 years. What a useless, gutless institution. Spineless before Modi, spineless after. N Ram has his own newspaper but runs abroad to whine to the BBC and Western propaganda outlets. Same with the FT — a white supremacist rag at heart, led by the likes of Gideon Rachman (genocide cheerleader, surprise!). Now that the body count is high enough and Netanyahu is "unfashionable," they smear India and Israel together. Insidious. Indian journos too cowardly to fight the state at home, but eager to help those who'd destroy India without hesitation. Worthless rags, all of them. Same FT/Rachman crowd that whitewashed other conflicts now lectures India-Israel on nationalism. Their 'rules-based order' means "rules for thee, not for me." Write a piece on the degeneracy of the Britain in 2026, shit stirrers in Ukraine, genocide participants in Gaza (is Modi so depraved?), even still illegally occupying Chagos, but you would recommend we take the FT seriously as it attacks India?

Super profile of India-Israel relationship in recent times @FT “In a world that was going towards universalism and post-national institutions,” says Reuven Azar, Israel’s ambassador to India, Modi and Netanyahu “were different . . . not just embracing nationalism but embracing identity”. ft.com/content/5829cf…

@hasanthehun Who gives a shit. Don't give this imperialist pig oxygen.

eric adams gave this to diddy, zohran is giving it to brunson

@DwnlodingMyMind @suhasinih @FT Do muslims globally condemn terror in India? They don't, in fact they are often cheering it on. Turkey, for example went the extra step and participated directly.

Hasbara in India [#India_ForeignPolicy] The only aspect of the identity these two guys share is the visceral hate of Muslims. Modi remains silent on the Gaza genocide being orchestrated by Tel Aviv's ruling #NeoNaziZionist Junta. Here is a selection of how deliberately and consciously its members are murdering Palestinians: downloadingmymind.com/annexure-d-isr… downloadingmymind.com/annexure-f-fod… Ambassador Azar's seductive thesis aimed at Indians echoes Israeli Ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman's, on the relationship with Down Under. The point is that this line is being drafted by #Hasbara in Tel Aviv. @IsraelinIndia @IsraelinOZ

@clashreport Spoken like a true white supremacist!

Pete Hegseth: Europe was not supposed to be a dependency of the United States. That's not what Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, or Konrad Adenauer wanted or expected. Europe was supposed to be a military power allied with a strong America.

@clashreport Is that even English? It's just a jumble of words. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No! It s mid-life crisis man!

Pete Hegseth: We will lead and exceed our own NATO spending standards. It's not "do as I say." It's "do as we do."

@RealEmirHan I had totally forgotten about this movie, not the best ending was it. Would probably see another one if they made it. Btw Anna Taylor-Joy is patently a bigger star than any of the Tarantino Manson family.

Anya Taylor-Joy didn’t like the original Furiosa ending and spent six months lobbying George Miller to change it, pushing hard against a “clean kill” for so that Furiosa herself would decide his fate. “I just advocated and advocated and advocated for her to live up to her name.”

Ouch!

Western countries do this all the time. Everyone knows thrybare barefaced liars. Excuse me sir, can you share the evidence? Not at this particular moment, no. 6 months later it's the same thing. A year later it's disproven. Remember that Bimbo Canadian, Turdeau? Accusing India of killing someone on Canadian soil? 1 year later and the victim was on the Canadian services payroll and the police had to say there is no evidence of Indian involvement. Rutte himself has been charged and convicted for lying when Dutch PM, don't believe a word this lot say, they are rotten from the top down.

NATO Secretary General Rutte on China's military support to Russia in Ukraine: "We are not naive; we follow everything exactly. I cannot tell you more at this moment, or at least in this open press conference, but you can be assured that we follow everything."

Why so much force? He’s only filming! 👮‍♀️😡🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 Sheffield 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 A journalist tries to film the police after they throw a 17 year old boy into a metal bollard with so much force it “bends” …the police don’t want him filming the incident close up so they use force against the journalist 😳👮‍♀️😡🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 @syptweet

@TadhgCalbhaigh I'm not sure that anyone in the West, outside of Baltimore MD knows what woke means. Your Miss Universe candidate is a reflection of how Westerners see women, like a peice of meat, only useful for sexual penetration.

Miss Universe Ireland finalist is a Filipino man. Are we the most woke nation on the planet at this stage? independent.ie/county/kerry/k…

Translation: United States wants Modi to go on a full blown war with China, so that US can defend India by selling weapons. In short Donald Trump wants Modi to be our Zelensky. Indian media is all set to play the role of Ukranian media that fueled that beautiful nation's doom.

The decision to ban Telegram over allegations that a handful of channels may have facilitated examination paper leaks represents a troubling departure from established constitutional principles. In any constitutional democracy governed by the rule of law, state action must satisfy the tests of legality, necessity, reasonableness and proportionality. The mere existence of unlawful activity on a platform cannot, by itself, justify the suppression of an entire medium of communication used by millions of citizens for lawful purposes. The Supreme Court of India has repeatedly held that restrictions on fundamental rights cannot be arbitrary, excessive or disproportionate to the objective sought to be achieved. In Modern Dental College v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2016), the Court formally adopted the doctrine of proportionality, requiring that any restriction must pursue a legitimate aim, be rationally connected to that aim, be the least restrictive measure available, and maintain a balance between the rights of citizens and the interests of the state. A blanket ban on Telegram struggles to satisfy this test when narrower alternatives such as identifying offending channels, prosecuting perpetrators, seeking platform cooperation, strengthening examination security protocols, and targeting specific unlawful content remain available. The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) further reinforced that restrictions on access to communication networks must be necessary, proportionate and subject to judicial scrutiny. The Court held that indefinite restrictions on internet access are impermissible and that the state must demonstrate that less intrusive alternatives are inadequate. The reasoning applies with equal force to any attempt to disable access to an entire messaging platform. Constitutional rights cannot be curtailed merely because a minority of users engage in unlawful conduct. The principle that overbroad restrictions are constitutionally suspect is also evident in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), where the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act. The Court recognised that vague and excessive restrictions on online speech create a chilling effect on lawful expression. Banning an entire platform because of the alleged misconduct of a few channels would similarly burden millions of legitimate users who have no connection whatsoever with examination malpractice. The state undoubtedly possesses a legitimate interest in protecting the integrity of examinations. However, constitutional jurisprudence requires that the response target the wrongdoers rather than the medium itself. By the same logic, one would not ban email services because leaked papers were transmitted through email, nor prohibit telephone networks because criminals used telephones. The law punishes unlawful conduct; it does not ordinarily extinguish lawful avenues of communication because they can be misused. The Supreme Court’s decision in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) also underscores that state action affecting digital rights must satisfy the tests of legality, legitimate aim, necessity and proportionality. Digital communication platforms have become integral to the exercise of speech, association, education and professional activity. Any attempt to deprive citizens of access to such platforms must therefore withstand rigorous constitutional scrutiny. At its core, the issue is not whether paper leaks should be prevented. They should be, and those responsible must face the full force of the law. The constitutional question is whether collective punishment can substitute for targeted enforcement. A blanket prohibition on Telegram would penalise millions of innocent users for the actions of a few alleged offenders. Such an approach risks violating the very principles of proportionality, reasonableness & fairness that lie at heart of Indian constitution

@WeekendInvestng I have absolutely no idea why anyone would think about no Indian AI, when there isn't even a global Indian smartphone app, let alone a domestic computer OS, or a smartphone OS.

Water shortage in Mumbai and Delhi (forget the rest of the country) Breathable Air Medical Infrastructure Health and Sanitation No Indian AI LLM Why are we regretting not solving Problem#5, when first 4 are still waiting.

After being beaten by Iran in a military skirmish, and by China in a technology and resources scramble, the US is now, most likely, moving to a new strategy 1) Ignore the middle-east and leave it to Iran 2) Let Israel fend for itself; let destiny take its route 3) Be friends with China to the extent possible 4) Don't overplay own hand in Pacific region 5) Gate own 'strategic competencies' (eg. AI) 6) Use India as required and extract whatever 7) Support Pakistan more 8) Dump Quad and Indo-Pacific notions 9) Sell energy & arms/weapons to the world pro-max 10) Be transactional and extractive wherever Iran's rapid rise is now indisputable. China has risen. Pakistan is in their good books. Since a large part of Indian industrial, political and bureaucratic elite are entirely compromised by the USA, expect zero resistance.

@TheNavroopSingh They are planning exactly that, no doubt about it, and have been doing it since the Biden administration.

More like a regime change threat !

Banning @telegram for NEET paper leak is akin to banning road usage because drug peddlers transport narcotics by road. Such is the genius of Modi Sarkar.

This POV is half-baked, just throwing terms around like vassal because they suit some unarticulated theory. First, India is a developing country who is reliant on stable relations with the wider world for its continued development. Second the US is the Global Hegemon, there is no power greater than the US whether militarily, economically, culturally, and diplomatically, so until India sorts itself out obtains a "blue water navy" which will take another 50-100 years, it is a subordinate power to the US just like every other country on the planet. To the question of "vassalage", no India is not a vassal, it is subordinate in many respects, but US vassals are clearly defined by an independent US military presence on sovereign territory like Rammstein or Prince Sultan.

India is not a vassal of the United States, but it’s more of a vassal of the United States than what Indian nationalists had you believe. From Strategic Autonomy to pragmatic vassalage, anyone?