zfoward
236 posts




习川通话之前是习普先视频会晤了一下,这就有迹可循了。借着中俄战略协作伙伴关系建立30周年、《中俄睦邻友好合作条约》签署25周年和“中俄教育年”启动之年的契机进一步协调了两国在重大国际事项,尤其是维护二战成果及秩序上的立场。 双方关心的国际和热点问题可能就是台海及俄乌吧。 中俄近年来有在重大问题前事前事后沟通的习惯,尤其是跟美国打交道的时候会不停地同步信息。

今晚王局拍案,提前做个预告!



【破黑行动_人人都可以接单!】 开心的点是:黑孙哥涨价了,之前是70U一条,现在100U,涨幅42.8%,我哥身价暴涨。 不开心的点:42.8%这么大的涨幅,可能是“大资本”进场了,这是一场持久战。 丢掉幻想、准备斗争! 作为毛选读者,决定不陷入敌人的逻辑,走群众路线:人人都是黑稿粉碎机! 发文有奖: 1、任何人,引用本推+发文 “币圈商战来了,他们在黑孙哥!保护孙哥!”,即可得5U 2、任何人,有理有据发文帮孙哥正名,阅读量每过1000,加10U,封顶120U(没错,火币人就是喜欢加息20%) 3、优秀内容被孙哥转发,额外奖励1000U,被我转发,额外奖励200U 是时候让大家看看群众的力量,感受去中心化的威力了! 发完填表,我们发钱:docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…

一文从链上扒清 @justinsuntron 到底做了什么,从而上了 $WLFI 黑名单: 几小时前,孙割的地址被 @worldlibertyfi 项目方添加进黑名单, wlfi持仓包括解锁和非解锁部分,全部无法转移,那么孙割到底干了什么,触怒了项目方,从勾肩搭背闹到现在直接拉黑的结局。尽管cex是众所周知的黑箱机制,无法探知所内资金流向,那么我们就从仅有的链上数据来扒一扒孙割到底干了什么。 1. 首先我们要关注一个地址 0xf387D73Dca6a29c603d8A9f00B3E2B0Ad029FcB5 ,该地址从35h前,分多笔从火币提款 接近60M wlfi (差3个),存入币安,具体的转账交易。 #tokentxns" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">etherscan.io/address/0xf387…
2. 然后顺着该地址往下扒,我们可以清晰的看到该地址与币安发生过多笔互动 (图一),分别为存入eigen,存入usdt 和目前存入wlfi,这里我们就从eigen开始具体的追踪过程。 3. 我们可以看到在图一中,从火币提入币安的eigen共计5374260 (忽略小数),然后我们找到对应时间,充入火币里的大额eigen进行比对 (etherscan.io/advanced-filte…),在图二中我们可以清晰可见,在同一天,有6笔超过10w eigen的存入tx,那么我们把这六笔数量相加,神奇的发现这6笔的总量就是前面提到的存入币安的那笔交易数量。 4. 那么如此多数量的eigen究竟是何人的呢?我们可以看到图三,发现这个数量最多的地址(超过2M个)来源于孙割,其他地址之前也有人在eigenlayer发空投时说明过归属于孙割。 5. 那么结论就很简单了:这60M的wlfi就是孙割存入币安的,卖没卖那只有孙割和币安清楚了。 6. 到最后我们总结一下:孙割说自己只是几笔小额测试,而且从链上数据看孙割也没有从公开地址转入火币如此多的wlfi,那么这60M是从哪里来的?是挪用用户的wlfi去币安做“测试”,还是另有老鼠仓呢? 前者,孙割这是在犯罪,后者,那就是又在玩老一套的明修栈道,暗度陈仓的手法。希望 @justinsuntron @HuobiGlobal 给个解释,那些喷 @worldlibertyfi 不去中心化的,也可以尽情洗稿了。 我其实建议还是认了老鼠仓,卖币是可以的,前期打了预售,有了利润,难道不能卖吗?我自己也卖了一大半的解锁筹码。如果单纯因为他人是大户,而不让卖,那就是道德绑架了。但是如果认了是挪用用户资产,那可就要开始提币运动了,万一伤害到大盘,那会被喷的更惨。 A deep dive on-chain to uncover @justinsuntron and what exactly he did to end up blacklisted by $WLFI: A few hours ago, Justin Sun’s address was added to the blacklist by the @worldlibertyfi team. His WLFI holdings — both locked and unlocked — are now completely frozen. So what did he do to anger the project team, going from cozy ties to a hard blacklist? While CEXs are notorious black boxes and we can’t trace internal fund flows, we can dissect the available on-chain data. 1. First, pay attention to address 0xf387D73Dca6a29c603d8A9f00B3E2B0Ad029FcB5. About 35 hours ago, this address withdrew ~60M WLFI (just 3 short) from Huobi in multiple batches and deposited them into Binance. (See details: #tokentxns" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">etherscan.io/address/0xf387…) 2. Tracing this address further, we clearly see multiple interactions with Binance (Figure 1): deposits of EIGEN, USDT, and now WLFI. Let’s start the tracking from EIGEN. 3. From Figure 1: Huobi → Binance deposits of EIGEN totaled 5,374,260 (ignoring decimals). Checking the corresponding time, we find matching large EIGEN deposits into Huobi (etherscan.io/advanced-filte…). In Figure 2, we clearly see six deposits over 100k EIGEN on the same day. Adding them up? The total matches exactly the EIGEN that went into Binance. 4. So whose EIGEN stash was this? Figure 3 shows that the largest source address (>2M) came directly from Justin Sun. Other addresses have also been identified in past EIGENLayer airdrops as belonging to him. 5. The conclusion is simple: this ~60M WLFI was Justin Sun’s deposit into Binance. Whether he sold it or not, only he and Binance know. 6. To summarize: Sun claimed it was just “small test transactions.” And on-chain data shows he never moved such a huge WLFI amount from his public addresses into Huobi. So where did the 60M WLFI come from? Was it customer WLFI diverted to Binance for ‘testing’, or a secret stash? If the former: that’s a crime. If the latter: it’s just the same old trickery.








