Brian Burtner

Reproductive coercion should be illegal. This requires that expectant fathers should have roughly one week from discovery to notify their partner that an abortion/termination is requested and required. If that happens, the expectant mother should be compelled to either: -abort the child sometimes within the first 24 weeks of gestation -carry and birth the child whereby it may be euthanized painlessly via barbiturate injection, ASAP or within 4 weeks of birth. Obviously, codifying these rights/responsibilities into law will also require mandatory paternity verification for, and notification to, expectant fathers - which is something our governments should be ensuring anyway. The vast legions of the so-called "pro-choice" orthodoxy will not support these improvements to public health and safety for one simple reason: they are not truly pro-choice. They are pro-woman and pro women's privileges, no matter the cost. The minute that one begins to talk about improving things for expectant fathers - rectifying the information asymmetry inherent to sexual reproduction, providing any post-coital window of veto power for men, or simply pointing out the hypocrisy of wailing about "bodily autonomy" in a world where male foreskin is medically harvested shortly after birth - their true gynocentric (and, in many cases, explicitly misandrist) nature is revealed.

@uubzu 60/40 my favor, maybe he'll get confused and accept

You are playing the ultimatum game (see replies) for one million dollars. You are paired up with a guy wearing a shirt which says I SWEAR TO FUCKING GOD ON THE LIVES OF MY CHILDREN I WILL REJECT THE DEAL UNLESS IT’S 60/40 IN MY FAVOR. PLEASE DO NOT TEST ME Your offer is:

Solving the JQ is simply a matter of not making it a question. It's a religion. Full stop. Not a race. Not a culture. If you aren't in the religion, you aren't Jewish. The Holocaust must be refuted completely. All laws that treat Jews as a race or the Holocaust as real repealed Problem solved.

@misterp33e yeah buttsex is gay, even when its with a woman

I'm a cis male. Having anal sex with a woman feels like having sex with a tight ring for my penis, I don't really enjoy it. Out of four women I've done anal with one liked it the other three hated it and had pain even being extremely gentle and luts of lube. Vaginal sex is like

Put this in the time capsule for the future so our great great grandkids know there were in fact incredible things happening during the era of great retardation 🃏 @jokerwaffenfren

Academia *knew* entire fields could not be replicated. They watched junk science proliferate and said nothing. This was not oversight. It was cowardly complicity.

Ok I will explain. Every complete ideology has a very specific relation to the past, present, and future: The past was perfect, because X hadn’t yet done Y. Then X did Y, and now we live in the fallen present. But in the future, X will stop doing Y, and everything will be perfect again. Ideologies really really need that “the past was perfect” part, because it proves that their future utopia is possible. You will notice that even religions have this structure. The Greek pagans had the Golden Age, Christianity has the Garden of Eden. Communism has this structure. Marx wrote in The Communist Manifesto that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” But Engels had to add a footnote clarifying that he only meant *written* history, and that once upon a time, “primitive communistic societies” existed everywhere. Why? Because Engels realized that if class struggle had always existed, then that undermined the communist case that class struggle could be eliminated. Communism needed its own Garden of Eden. Now, modern historians and archaeologists aren’t (all) communists. But most are what some people have recently started calling “race communists.” That is, they strongly agree with these statements about the present and the future: “We live in a fallen world where people hate each other based on race and ethnicity. But in the future, people will stop hating each other based on race and ethnicity, and everyone will live together in peace and harmony.” The problem is, that’s not a complete ideology. It needs a corresponding belief about the past. It needs: “In the past, people didn’t hate each other based on race and ethnicity.” Otherwise, their peaceful utopian future becomes unbelievable. And so, wherever possible, whenever an iota of doubt could be created, archaeologists and historians tried to rewrite history and edit out ethnic conflict. The Indo-European invasions? That was a mere migration of “pots, not people.” The Anglo-Saxon conquest of Britain? Just a small number of mostly peaceful immigrants who assimilated the Romano-Briton majority to their culture. Rome was an anti-racist multicultural paradise. Etc etc etc. But anyway, now DNA has shown all that to be bullshit, so guys like David Reich (who actively participated in this censorious editing of history btw) are starting to give up and move on.

"No, they eat and drink, Sam. The Shadow that bred them can only mock, it cannot make: not real new things of its own. I don't think it gave life to the orcs, it only ruined them and twisted them; and if they are to live at all, they have to live like other living creatures."

@iky_fwjett This is why a law mandating DNA testing upon birth should be the law.

Since I keep seeing this, it made me think about what a pointless endeavor it is to "parody" Infowars at all. Nothing you can do will ever be funnier than what Alex himself did for like 20 years.

the point @RichardDawkins is making is: if Claude can code/do philosophy/engage in conversation and is not conscious and a human with late stage dementia who can't speak is "conscious" then the definition of "conscious" is broken and fundamentally useless which is obvious

@dissidentwest "Let's roast an old man who's contributed more to the world than the majority of us ever will because of a clickbait article title about the possibility of AI consciousness" Very Christian of you

Richard Dawkins being convinced that Claude is conscious should be the final nail in the coffin for midwit atheists. But it won’t

@RemyTheRedVT Typical foid "reasoning" that should immediately disqualify you from exercising any political influence whatsoever.

I’m late to the red/blue party but here’s my take I guess lol. Simplest view I can give is: Yes, if everyone is able to touch the button with full awareness of what they’re doing and no chance to fuck up, red makes sense. But that isn’t how reality would ever play out. In a scenario where -everyone- gets the red/blue button at the same time, you have the following: -old, baby, blind, deaf, asleep, unconscious, incapacitated, etc people who cannot touch either button, or end up touching the blue button in error -no guaranteed ability to make sure people you care about touch the red button -awareness that no matter how you feel about it, a certain number of people will touch blue. The red/blue button includes people who don’t touch the button at all as part of who dies if 51% of people don’t touch blue. So every coma patient, every person in surgery, every quadriplegic, or person with an inability to choose dies, not just blue button pushers. It also doesn’t clarify whether or not, for example, unborn children who are close to birth count as ‘everyone’ by the standards of whatever horrible entity decided the red/blue button question would be a fun thing to pose to humanity. So what do we do if the death radius includes fetuses inside their mothers as people who didn’t choose? And would you really want to take a chance on whether or not they are included since there’s no way to guarantee it? Under that scenario, choosing red guarantees a lot of people die through no fault of their own if more people press red than blue. I’m not going to pretend I’m a saint, because I’m not. I cannot rightly promise that I wouldn’t press red if there was a guaranteed way for me to ensure everyone I love did too. But because I can’t guarantee that, I would most likely press blue, because that is the only way I could maximise the chance that my loved ones, including the ones who can’t choose would survive. Is it silly from a pure survival standpoint? Yeah, probably. But I don’t think I could live with the guilt of knowing I killed my sisters unborn child, or my toddler niece who likes blue more than red, or my dad when he’s unconscious in surgery because I wasn’t willing to risk my life to try and hit a measly 51% target.

The causal chain brain_damaging->killing->eating shouldn't be just rare, it should be effectively impossible for someone to even misconstrue a series of events as such, looking from the outside. This merits redundancy in proscriptions across that chain. Laws regularly fail, but less so in series. It should be standard practice to terminate the lives of people with no higher brain function, imo - but probably only in cases where they are born that way (chromosomal abnormality cases). Even here it is wise to prohibit eating them afterward (cannibalism is also plain unhealthy; there really is no good reason to do it).

@BrianBurtner @Aella_Girl That argument doesn't make very much sense. If it were legal to kill people with no higher brain function, we could still make it extremely illegal (equivalent to murder) to injure people in a way that takes away their higher brain function.

How mentally impaired would a human have to be before it would be ok to kill and eat them?

@TukiFromKL Religious folk are desperate to "own" Dawkins. The reality, you cant refute any of his arguments against the existence of god. God doesnt exist.

@captive_dreamer Correction: Charlie Kirk was an extremely effective outreach personality that got young Americans interested in politics. He was murdered by a leftist, Trump had two weeks to take decisive action, he did nothing instead, and now here we are watching the vultures feast.

TPUSA is an extremely effective outreach program that gets young Americans interested in politics and gets them out to vote for Trump and MAGA. That's why they're attacking it and anyone who represents the org

@redaction The mushroom kingdom is a white ethnostate and a white supremacist's ideal world, they even all have A40 eyes

Religion Tierlist

@AustinJustice @KenPaxtonTX can you please prosecute @JosePGarza as an accessory to murder (& many other crimes) for all of the criminals he & his criminal dick sucking asst. DA's are responsible for? Also, can we do this to the Judges as well? Thanks, Texans-

@thefreespi65329 Great list overall for the higher tiers, but I'm wondering - what makes you put Sikhism so low, even below Islam? Same question for Jehovah's Witnesses; their disbelief in ghosts/spirits/afterlife make them one of the more based Christian denominations imo.