Colorado Macrofunga Project

213 posts

Colorado Macrofunga Project banner
Colorado Macrofunga Project

Colorado Macrofunga Project

@COmacrofunga

Getting our hands dirty with the DNA of Colorado’s fungi.

Colorado, USA Se unió Temmuz 2018
149 Siguiendo323 Seguidores
Colorado Macrofunga Project
Colorado Macrofunga Project@COmacrofunga·
@ItaiYanai Unpopular for the uninitiated. Seasoned scientists understand, respect, and appreciate the peer review process.
English
0
0
0
38
Itai Yanai
Itai Yanai@ItaiYanai·
Unpopular opinion: the peer review process does significantly improve the final work (though it is inevitably very long and super frustrating).
English
100
56
1.1K
425.3K
Jesse Czekanski-Moir
Jesse Czekanski-Moir@jesseSeeEm·
keeping a lab notebook in pen that is water and/or alcohol soluble seems genuinely bonkers to me. I get that some archival pens are $$$, but it seems like $2 - $5 is worth it if it means a spill won't potentially erase pages of your data? </rant>
English
4
1
4
0
Colorado Macrofunga Project retuiteado
Todd Osmundson
Todd Osmundson@Osmundson_lab·
Honored to have had the opportunity to recognize the many mycological contributions made by my PhD mentor, collaborator, and friend Roy Halling in a special edition of The Botanical Review celebrating recently-retired NYBG curators: rdcu.be/clxok
English
0
1
6
0
Colorado Macrofunga Project
Colorado Macrofunga Project@COmacrofunga·
@dhaelewa @opwall I may have DNA here. I need to check. I which case it may be just as easy to sequence here. One of the Belize specimens was from Cathie too. Let me look and get back to you. I can dig up the ITS and 28S for the CR C. lutescens onto GenBank.
English
0
0
0
0
Colorado Macrofunga Project
Colorado Macrofunga Project@COmacrofunga·
@dhaelewa @opwall Just went digging into my old datasets and while I had specimens from Costa Rica and Belize, it seems their sequences were never produced or made it into the analyses. However I have C. lutescens from CR sequence data, but this is not that species.
English
0
0
0
0