JoculRec

‘“Puberty blocker” is a nice way of saying chemical castration. It leaves children sterile, mentally stunted and unable to have orgasms. We’re effectively turning them into eunuchs.’ @HJoyceGender on the medical scandal of gender-affirming care:

Andrew Cairney from Glasglow, Scotland loading all nine of The Ardblair Stones

This gets even uglier when you look at what happens after Palantir gets inside a system. It is pure dependency engineering. In Britain, MPs are now openly warning that Palantir is becoming ubiquitous across government, while the same regulator that hired it had already warned that heavy reliance on a small number of big tech firms creates systemic risk. Read that again. Even while taking the deal, they are admitting the model itself is dangerous. And the NHS angle is worse than many people realize. In Parliament, MPs said that after more than £330m, the contract leaves the NHS with no software ownership, no IP, and no lasting know how. The supplier keeps the rights. So the public pays, the private contractor learns, and the state stays stuck renting the machinery. Now add the military side. Palantir’s Maven platform is moving deeper into permanent Pentagon status, with a previous contract ceiling already raised to $1.3b and a separate Army enterprise agreement worth up to $10b. During a recent Palantir event, a Pentagon official even demonstrated how Maven could be used for weapons targeting in the Middle East. People keep pretending this is just “data software” while it is literally being normalized closer and closer to the kill chain. And while all this is happening, Palantir’s CEO is out there defending the company’s surveillance tech as government sales surge. Palantir U.S. government revenue jumped 66% in Q4 2025 to $570m. So no, this is not some edgy startup fighting the machine. The machine is feeding it. Rapidly. This is the warning people need to get through their skulls: You are looking at an unelected operating layer for power. And once the state gets addicted to that layer, good luck removing it before it starts deciding what a society is allowed to see, sort, flag, punish, and optimize. And the Vance angle makes it even darker. J.D. Vance is not some neutral bystander who just happens to be standing next to this machine. He is a political product of Peter Thiel’s network. Thiel hired him into Mithril. Thiel backed his rise. Thiel then poured $15 million into the super PAC that helped shove Vance through the Ohio Senate primary. So when people act like Palantir and the current US power structure are separate worlds, they are lying to themselves. The vice president came out of the same patronage ecosystem that built Palantir. And this is no longer just about “defense tech.” The US government is wiring itself around Palantir as infrastructure. The Army collapsed about 75 separate contracts into 1 Palantir enterprise agreement for its future software and data needs. DHS then opened a $1 billion blanket purchase agreement so agencies like ICE, CBP, TSA, FEMA, and Secret Service can buy Palantir faster and with less friction. That is not ordinary procurement. That is institutional lock in. The military piece is worse still. The Pentagon’s own budget documents already placed Maven Smart System and Army Vantage inside the data and application layer used to support the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in giving decision support to the President, the National Security Council, and the Secretary of Defense. Read that again. Palantir linked systems are not sitting on the edge. They are moving into the bloodstream of top level state decision making. Then add immigration. So the same company orbit is now sitting across war planning, federal data integration, and deportation machinery, while one of the most powerful men in Washington rose through the patronage network of its chairman. That should terrify people. Because this is how democratic states rot in the digital age. Not when 1 cartoon villain grabs a microphone. When private software, private patronage, and public force merge so completely that nobody can tell where government ends and the contractor begins.

If there's one short video that encapsulates the insanity of the pandemic, this is it. "Trust the science" and "listen to the experts" and then the science experts deny their own actions.

Nå kommer Europaparlamentet, Brussel og Ursula von der Leyen for det norske pensjons- og oljefondet. Politikere i EU mener Norge har for mye rikdom – og at 20–25 % av denne bør «erverves» av teknokratene i Brussel. Pengene skal blant annet brukes til å finansiere Ukraina og EUs konflikt med Russland. Samtidig pekes det på at folk i EU får stadig dårligere råd og sliter med å betale regningene sine. Løsningen? At Norge skal stille opp økonomisk. Så spørsmålet er enkelt: Hvor går grensen? Når blir norsk sparing til europeisk felleskasse? 🇳🇴💰⚡️ #Norge #Oljefondet #EU #Politikk #Ukraina #Økonomi #Brussel

🧵10 things we need to do in order to eradicate gender ideology from British society: 1. Repeal the Gender Recognition Act 2004. 2. Remove the protected characteristic of ‘gender reassignment’ from the Equality Act 2010. 3. Permanently ban and criminalise puberty blockers. 4. Permanently ban and criminalise cross-sex hormones. 5. Permanently ban and criminalise ‘sex re-assignment surgeries’. 6. Close all ‘gender clinics’ and bring children who believe themselves to be in the wrong body back into the central mental health system. 7. Cancel the government proposal to introduce legislation banning talking therapies (under the guise of ‘conversion therapy’). 8. Sever the ‘LGB’ from the ‘T’ in all public policies and protocols. 9. Remove all trans ideological symbolism from public buildings. 10. Ban schools from teaching gender ideology. Any others? Post them below.

I agree with this list and have recommended similar for some time and in written reports. I would add the following, with a specific focus on schools: - Scrap the existing RSE Guidance (which currently specifies teaching about ‘T’ and Gender Reassignment) and replace with a smaller, fact-based sex ed module. - Personally, I’d repeal the EA2010 in its entirety, but at least it should be removed altogether from teaching - activists use it to politicise and sexualise children and might well slip in ‘gender’ or ‘queer theory’ via other PCs of Sex and Sexual Orientation. Children don’t need to be taught anti-discrimination law, except perhaps as part of an A Level in politics. - Insist that RSE is only taught in-house by qualified teachers, to shut out the third sector activists. - Enforce the Education Act s406/407, which prohibits political indoctrination. - Introduce a new clause to the Education Act which prohibits the sexualisation of children. - Prohibit the so-called ‘social transition’ of children, and treat it as abuse. - Create an effective parental complaint system with real teeth to sack teachers who engage in malpractice. - Update KCSIE to list the promotion of gender theory as a safeguarding failure and the expression of trans identities by children as an inherent safeguarding concern. - Ban age-inappropriate and sexualising books that promote gender ideology and TQ+ themes from school libraries. - Ban LGBT school clubs. - Fund a national re-education scheme for teacher training and development, to undo the terrible effect caused by multi million pound govt-sponsored training schemes that promoted gender ideology across the education sector. - Prohibit people who indulge in cross sex impersonation in public from teaching. - Withdraw from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and UN agencies such as UNICEF and UNESCO, which promote gender ideology. - Proscribe the NEU for extremism or take legal action against it for putting children at risk if it continues to promote gender ideology to its members and in schools. - Reform charity law, precluding charities from promoting gender ideology to children or in schools. - Prohibit academic research and surveys in schools unless absolutely necessary and there are extremely careful controls and parental oversight, and completely cut govt funding to university research on gender identity in relation to pedagogy. Any more???

💥This shocking 💥 The Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) our health regulator carried out active monitoring of ~ 36000 individuals of which ~ 30000 took the Covid ‘vaccine’. For 4 years they have sat on THEIR OWN DATA which showed that 51% of the vaccinated had an adverse reaction and 1 in 7 or 13% had a severe adverse reaction (which can include death and is considered significant/ life changing ) . Despite this the MHRA have not pulled the jabs. This information was made public ( quietly ) in Sept 2025. Let that sink in ! In the MHRA trail 1 in 7 vaccine recipients died or had a life changing injury 💥 My only question is when will the arrests start ? They knew the shots were highly dangerous in 2022.

@DocPriyamMD That's some bio engineering feat

Today, a 2nd-year med student asked me why we can't completely clear HIV from the body like other viruses and the answer is the closest thing to a horror movie in modern medicine

'Turkish' barbers = people smuggling. Hewa Rahimpur, an Iranian Kurd, smuggled thousands of people in whilst appearing to run a small barbershop in Ilford. He arrived in the back of a lorry in 2016 and realised how profitable it was. £6000 per person. £260,000 per boat. This one man had 60 boats. He alone smuggled in the region of 10,000 people. All hidden behind a Turkish barber shop.

@SteveTheD6CEO @Her_Nonymous_D You sound like a wrong 'un Steve. Stay away from kids please 🚩

But you are teaching your daughter to be rude. You have no right to impose your boundaries on someone else's generosity. If you dont want your daughter eating candy, I understand. Many older ppl dont understand what we do about sugar. So just take the sucker and tell him thank you and that you will save it for later. Explain to your daughter that its better to show gratitude. Instead you made yourself the bad guy. You ruined an old man's day who was just trying to be kind. And you taught your daughter to do the same. I wouldnt have let my child eat that piece of candy either. But I would have been kind and gracious to the old man. We both have boundaries. But you become a rude control freak when yours are crossed. You shoukd work on that.

My daughter (3yo) and I were walking through an aisle when an older man approached us. He was smiling and seemed friendly enough at first. Without much conversation, he pulled out a lollipop and tried to offer it directly to her. Before my toddler could even react, I calmly said, “No, thank you.” My daughter also declined immediately, which honestly made me feel a little proud in the moment. She’s learning to respond the same way I do. But instead of accepting that, he kept going. He leaned in again, still trying to hand it to her, speaking to her directly like I hadn’t just said “No” politely. It wasn’t aggressive, but it also wasn’t respectful of the boundary that had already been set. So I stepped in more firmly. I took the lollipop from his hand, repeated, “No, thank you,” and placed it on a nearby counter. I didn’t raise my voice, I didn’t make a scene, I just made it very clear that the answer wasn’t changing. And that’s when the tone shifted. He said I was…

X is broken @elonmusk . The search function doesn't work and X won't allow me to repost anything.

2022 was a different time. They really said skipping the vaccine causes car crashes. And people believed this.

Labour... 5 year olds can choose their sex 15 year olds cannot use facebook 16 year olds can vote More taxes will make the country richer Banning North Sea drilling will give us energy security Giving £millions to France will stop the boats Never vote Labour-they are idiots.

My name is Frank Zelenko @frank_zelenko . In 2020 I opened this account for my brother Dr Vladimir Zev Zelenko of blessed memory. This was his first account and it was one of the first accounts shadow banned, throttled and suspended by the old Twitter regime during Covid. Around the time Elon Musk took over twitter the suspension was lifted. However, he’d already opened a second account which became his primary account for the last few years. A few months ago that primary account was hacked and we’ve been pleading with X to help us get it back from the hackers. So far we’ve not heard back from X. So I will be posting my brother’s content here, especially his primary message regarding the treatment of ssRNA viruses.

'Turkish' barbers are run by Kurds or Albanians. 18,000 of them on your streets near your homes. They run most of the illegal cigarette business worth £3 billion a year. Behind it is a network of goods smuggling, counterfeiting, people trafficking, and cigarettes and drugs. These are massive organised crime groups like the Mafia right in the middle of our smallest towns.

Hansen, easily the biggest fraudster in history? Oh boy where do I start? This is an activist who got his PhD by claiming that Venus is hot due to a so-called "Greenhouse Effect"! What an absolute JOKE. This activist got promoted to be the head of GISS, where he tampered with the data for decades, to force it to fit his fake CO2-driven models. Hansen's data tampering has been documented (since 1999) at Real Science; stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tampering… climatism.wordpress.com/2013/11/11/ano… stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/01/11/noa… climatism.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/screen… climatism.wordpress.com/category/hocke… climatism.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/gis… climatism.wordpress.com/2013/12/01/nas… And at Milton Conservative; miltonconservative.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/data-t… Nov 2015; massive new NOAA climate data fraud exposed by journalist Günter Ederer on the site Principia Scientific, data checked by Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert; principia-scientific.org/nasa-exposed-i… The methods employed were; • Reducing the annual mean in the early phase. • Reducing the high values in the first warming phase. • Increasing individual values during the second warming phase. • Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995. • Shortening the early decades of the datasets. • With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened. Real Climate Science has found a ‘special +1c anomaly temperature fraud’ which was apparently especially concocted for the Paris COP21 meeting in December, 2015; realclimatescience.com/2015/11/record… Now you can get the global temperature you want to order – exactly when you need it! Incredibly, the ‘scientists’ at NASA even knew what the October 2015 temperature would be – within 0.01c – even BEFORE they had calculated any of the data! Another site has been monitoring all the data tampering in all the datasets since 2006; climate4you.com/index.htm The UK’s CRU have also recently switched from HadCRUT3 to HadCRUT4 to try and bump up the record, because 3 was cooling strongly. They have fraudulently lowered 1998 by 0.1c in HadCRUT4 and boosted 2007 by 0.25c to make it appear that 1998 was not the hottest. See the adjustments that were made after 2008 here; #HadCRUT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">climate4you.com/GlobalTemperat… MaturityDiagram Here is HadCRUT3 and 4 compared; woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3v… The most reliable long-term record we have is HadCRUT3, which shows just 0.3c of warming in the last 75 years; that is - a rate of warming of 0.4c per century. An overview of the 'adjustments' to NOAA's NCDC temperature record can be found here; climate4you.com/images/NCDC%20… Only the changes done since 2006 have been documented; even so this has amounted to about 0.2c over the 20th century. The effect of the changes is to make all temperatures recorded prior to 1945 cooler and all those after 1945 warmer, resulting in a much steeper rise in 20th century temperatures. Data fraud at the NCDC; climate4you.com/images/NCDC%20… Data fraud at NOAA with poorly-sited US stations; dailycaller.com/2015/12/17/exc… Data fraud at the UK’s MET; wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/12/met… Anthony Watts; youtube.com/watch?v=pjlPvw… Data fraud in Brazil; notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/11/22/mas… Even the Russians have documented the fraud of their datasets by the UK’s MET and the CRU; iea.ru/article/kioto_… wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/12/met… Data fraud in Australia at BOM; jennifermarohasy.com/tag/temperatur… jennifermarohasy.com/wp-content/upl… jennifermarohasy.com/2014/09/homoge… theaustralian.com.au/national-affai… If just the raw data itself is used, Australia's hottest year was 1885. Data fraud at New Zealand’s NIWA; #more-26173" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">wattsupwiththat.com/2010/10/09/new… Switzerland have been caught too; Science journalist Markus Schär of the Swiss news weekly Weltwochediscovered the Swiss Meteorological Service (SMS) tampered with its datasets as well. notrickszone.com/wp-content/upl… More tampering has been found, this time in Paraguay; notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/all… And in the Arctic; notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/tem… GAST temperature fraud in detail as reported by Dr Idso, Dr Wallage and Dr D’Aleo; heartland.org/_template-asse… Investigations are now being carried out into all this data fraud in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and in the UK. Activist Hansen is arrested YET AGAIN; 10:52 AM · Apr 20, 2026

Mandelson was a member of the Trilateral Commision. So was Epstein until his death. Starmer still is a member. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilatera… Like Starmer, Mandelson started out as a Communist despite the fact that his Mum was the daughter of Baron Herbert Morrison a former Labour Minister. Peter became a TV producer even though he had no experience. But he was a firm friend of Lord Birt who later ran The BBC. Birts wife was a Director of Fujitsu who made the Horizon Computer system which caused all of the problems for the Post Office managers. Mandelson recommended the Fujitsu system to Blair who forced the Post Office to use it. Mandelson began his political career at Labour run Lambeth Council which has been forced to pay out over £70 Million to children who suffered abuse in their Childrens Homes when Councillors allowed known pedo's to run orphanages. Oh what tangled web's we weave?

I've never seen so many people this happy to be ripped off. Is there a clinical term pending for this disorder?

OK one last go..... for those who follow or interact with me the usual caveats around apologising for repetition. For anyone remotely interested in protecting the vulnerable from sexual and physical harm, particularly children please read the below. All of the facts and statistics I will refer to are openly and relatively early verifiable. Yoy can even use Grok to check should you have difficult believing me. I work in Public Protection. It comes under many names in different forces, MOSOVO, Jigsaw e.t.c but it all concerns the same thing. Managing the risk posed by Registered Sex Offenders and other Potentially Dangerous Persons to the Public. I have done this role for approximately six years as Police Officer and have a number of other skills and roles which are part time including being a level 2 Officer (riot Officer in common parlance) and a CBRN Officer alongside some additional skillsets. Prior to this I was on a mixture of Response and C.I.D. teams. In my current role I have arrested and taken to Court approximately 300 Registered Sex Offenders for further offending. I say this not to boast or for self aggrandisement but to try and establish my credentials and to demonstrate that what I am saying is backed by experience and profound knowledge of the subject matter. We are fucked. It is the fault of successive Governments and public apathy. If you wish to know why and the reality of the situation then please read on. If you don't then do so in the knowledge you are making a choice to not understand what is happening to the people trying to protect you and your children from RSO's. That might make you feel angry and upset. It should do. We would not be in this situation without your apathy. If you wish to do something about that we need you to harness those emotions and utilise them accordingly. The Sex Offenders Register began in 1997. It's genesis came from the realisation and acknowledgement that sex offenders need a degree of monitoring and controlling to protect the public. Thus was born VISOR. The Violent and Sexual Offender Register. This is a database maintained and updated by the Police which monitor and tracks Sex Offenders and tries to ensure they are tracked, monitored and adhering to the requirements needed of them. This was further added to by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and formally codified in the Sex Offender Notification Requirements. These are requirements incumbent on ALL rso's to register their names, aliases, addresses, passports etc. Failure to do so is a criminal offence with a maximum sentence of breaching being 5 years imprisonment. At this juncture it is worth pointing out that we are one of the few countries to have such a Register. America and Australia (along with a few others) also have one. Almost none of our European contemporaries do. Indeed the idea of a European Sex Offenders registry has been mooted numerous times and has failed to come to fruition. A number of European countries including Spain and France have explicitly argued that such a Register would breach the human rights enshrined by the ECHR for those subjected to it. All these countries despite not having such a Register to manage and Police have vastly greater Policing resources available to them. The U.K. has one of the lowest Officer to population ratio in all of Europe. Approximately half that of France, Spain, Italy, Greece and Russia. About a third less than Germany. Bear that in mind as and if you read on as despite us having such low numbers and resources we have correspondingly far greater duties. All whilst being routinely unarmed. In the U.K. when the Register was first established it was recognised that it would need officers and staff to manage the RSO's on it. To visit, monitor, support and if necessary arrest them for infractions of their conditions or further offending. When the guidelines for workload were drawn up it was decreed that no individual Officer would have more than thirty Offenders to manage. Anything more was seen and inherently unworkable and likely to result in increased risk. This number and the time it was created is, again, very important to bear in mind as you read on. The limit of thirty was imposed before the creation of Sexual Offenders Prevention Orders and their later successor Sexual Harm Prevention Orders. These are Court Orders bespoke and tailored to an RSO's offending. They will limit things such as an Offenders access to children, Internet access, apps they can use, registering internet enabled devices with Police e.t.c. e.t.c. Their use has vastly increased and results in large numbers of arrests and investigations as Offenders breach them. Again the maximum sentence for breaching such an order is 5 years. Fast forward to 2010 and the Home Office quietly changed the maximum number of Offenders an individual Officer could manage. Instead of thirty it was now fifty. This was not debated in Parliament. It was not really debated at all. It was not imposed due to increasing resources or lack of work the stark naked truth was there were too many Offenders and not enough Officers. Indeed despite the ever increasing number of RSO's there had been an approximately 20 percent in the number of Public Protection Offficers to deal with them with greater workload and complexity due to the introdution of SOPO's. You will note the date. 2010. The start of austerity. Bear in mind how bad the situation was therfore prior to austerity and brace yourself accordingly for what has come next. Since 2014 the number of RSO's has doubled. From approximately 50,000 to 100,000. In that same timeframe Police funding has been catastrophically slashed. The Met alone has lost a billion pounds in real term funding. My own force has lost hundreds of millions. Between 6 to 8 hundred Police Stations have closed. Tens of thousands of Officers have left. That was all needed experience. As of today around a third of Officers in the U.K. have less than five years experience. That is an appalling, disastrous figure. Government spokesman about healthy churn. In reality they wished to gut Police of experience as it was cheaper to have lots of inexperienced Officers bith in terms of general pay and pensions. Governmental Ministers will often talk about protecting the front line. This is meaningless jargon. Back office staff are crucial and critical. Worse when they are gone the tasks they performed still have to be done..... by the front line. Remember this when you are struggling to get hold of emergency response officers with their tiny numbers and horrific myriad of duties and tasks they need to complete. You were warned about this. You were warned of the consequences of the cuts and what it would mean to Policing. You did not listen. The Government gambled, correctly, on your stupidity, myopia, apathy and ignorance. They knew that when the chickens came home to roost that the Police would be Blamed for the effects of the cuts imposed upon them. They were, heartbreakingly, entirely correct to gamble as such. So 100,000 RSO's, decreasing staff and Officer numbers, greater tasks. On my team the current average is now 64 Offenders each to manage within the community. Over double the number to manage than when the Register started. Every single member of my team failed their last psychological screening which we have to complete yearly. Every single one. If one of them goes off sick or decides they can no longer bear to carry on the number we will manage will jump to around 76 each. This isn't manageable. It isn't right. This is a national disgrace replicated across the board. If you think my colleagues seem weak or unmotivated consider the conditions they labour under on your behalf. Due to our tiny numbers we have noone to hand onto. This means if we arrest someone we deal with them entirely. Arrest, searches(section 32 and 18), interview, casefile building, going to CPS to obtain charges e.t.c. An arrest will usually result in a remand given the level of risk we deal with. That means a shift of, ordinarily, between 16 to 20 hours. On average we arrest 2-3 RSO's a week. Our stations are often, literally, falling apart with leaks and crumbling infrastructure. Waiting for solicitors which, like us, have been denuded of funding and investment so there are not nearly enough. This means my team are exhausted with massive impacts on their personal lives and missing out on children and family events e.t.c... even basic expectations of sleep cannot be met. My colleagues and I regularly deal with extrme offences and exceptionally dangerous people. Two weeks ago one of the men we deal with was sentenced, amongst the things we uncovered, for assaulting two of my colleagues whilst arresting him. To say nothing of the appalling material we regularly are subjected to when gathering evidence. Having to grade multiple videos of babies and toddlers being raped and provide a statment after 16 hours on duty in a station so stripmined off funds it cannot even supply sachets of squash for its officers to drink is not an ideal work environment. All this before we get to the Courts.. The Court system has, broadly, ceased to function. There are not enough specialist lawyers and Judges to deal with normal cases let alone specialist and sexual cases. Trial dates are, in of themselves, a national emergency. Basic task like transferring Defendants from prison to Court or getting liveliness to prison regularly simply fail to work. Accelerated by the privatisation of these services. The prisons themselves are collapsing. In the U.K. the Prison estate is operating at just under 100% capacity. That is a disgrace. Again successive Governments have failed to invest and fund. The Public have failed to hold them to account. Prison Officers operate in squalid, dangerous, terrifying conditions. They don't have the equipment and backup they need because Governments have "allowed" themselves to be led by pressure groups and activisits because its chepaer than properly equipping them. Something that many of these groups may wish to ponder. Yoy are simply carrying water for Governments looking to do things on the cheap. Prison Officers don't have tasers because the reality is it costs money. Both for the equipment and training. It is cheaper to "listen" to pressure groups to provide the political cover as a reason. The Government don't really believe or care that violent prisoners might be "traumatised" by the sight of a taser that may have been used on them outside of prison. It's just a hook to hang failure to resource on. This complete abrogation of responsibility from those who Govern in our name has made our prison estate woefully over populated, highly dangerous and open to corruption and subversion by organised crime. The tactics and technology are readily available, for instance, to prevent drone drops of money, drugs, phones e.t.c. They are not implemented because they cost money. Or indeed because the tentacles of corruption have embedded themselves ever further up the chain. It is hard to believe our ministers are such paragons of virtue that they are beyond the purview of being corrupted by organised crime. I am now arresting and breaching Offenders who are arriving at bail hostels with undeclared internet enabled devices, simcards and USB sticks that they have brought with them from prison. Prisoners in many establishments openly film and record themselves, they have YouTube channels and update their dating profiles from inside.... and continue to offend. That prison crisis directly impacts the management of RSO's. Prison terms have been cut from 50% of a sentence to 40% now to 30%. Ministers have repeatedly assured us that violent and sexual offenders are exempt from th3se releases. That is a straight lie. Sexual and Violent Offenders as graded by Police and Probation are regularly being let out using these schemes. I have already arrested and remanded quite alot of them for further offending. Ministers language has now changed saying that dangerous offenders will not be released. Again this is pure mendacity. Mendacity erected on your gambled ignorance. What Ministers are saying here is that those prisoners designated as a dangerous offender by a Judge and sentenced accordingly are exempt from these release schemes. That is a very rare designation. It means that an offender who is found dangerous will serve two thirds of their sentence and be subject to an extended license period. The vast majority of sexual and violent offenders are not so designated. From rapists to domestic abusers north of 95% of such individuals will not be deemed dangerous. When Ministers say dangerous offenders will not be released they are lying. They are deliberately using technical legal terminology not in any way shape or from the meaning of dangerous as the public would understand it. There's so much more to discuss but most won't ever read as far as this. Asylum seekers? There's a hot button issue. Are yoy aware that the Home Office won't deport someone (as rarely as they do anyway) if they have an active criminal investigation against them? Repeatedly raped a child?when you're released and waiting for the deportation process carry on committing crime. It stops the process. What a design system. I haven't even touched on Probation and their crucification and disintegration. Reactive management of RSO's? Such a cornucopia of horror and decay you are all kept deliberately ignorant of I can only use the tools and resources given to me by the Government to protect you. The Government will only give to me what it feelsit can get away with. It is up to the Public to redress the balance. I cannot strike. The Police and the Military give up the right to strike to serve You. You will note that bith organisations have been filleted and gutted by successive Governments. The Police are the Public. The Public the Police. When you denigrate me and mock me for failings that I have had no hand in creating and you have allowed you are simply engaging in self-harm. The results of that are now manifest everywhere in our society. If you want to start to redress the issues than do so. Ask politicians about what i am saying. Demand answers. Is anyone marching and protesting about this? Are they bollox. I have said it before but it is worth repeating I find it more stress relieving and rewarding to drive aid convoys to Kyiv them I do serving the British public. I go again October. I will be met by people who are kind and decent to me, pleased to see and grateful for my meagre efforts at help. Go on ask your local MP about all thus, ask your elected officials. They will not answer me. I have tried. They will all, uniformly, ignore me. It's cheaper that way.