Billions Must Love

1.2K posts

Billions Must Love

Billions Must Love

@NewOrder369

Engineer. Trilingual. I love culture, architecture, science, history, politics, military, economy, and basically everything human 🤷‍♂️

Se unió Kasım 2023
161 Siguiendo8 Seguidores
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@PurdoUpNorth @Mutd_tribe03 @AFCGunna10 @jaanamaya ?? Neymar was also accused of rape. But when the “victim” knew there were cameras in their hotel room she started saying that she was un-raped miraculously and started begging his cock to dismiss the case bc she knew she was a liar lmao
English
0
0
1
16
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress “Lower rank” ≠ “lower substance” lil bro 😂 Fathers said Father > Son in order/authority/PERSON= “monarchy of Father” They NEVER said “lesser substance/being”. If Son = lesser substance, then He’s a creature. That’s Arius, not Justin/Tertullian. They’d anathematize you for it
English
0
0
0
10
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress "Both uncaused and uncreated in NATURE." NATURE MY SON AND BLUD SAYS 😂😂😂😂🤥🤥🥀 HOLY COPE UNA. No they believed the Son was a lesser God with lesser substance of divinity than the Father & the Father being more nobler & Kingly, this pic is so low tier my ai buddy
English
3
0
0
18
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress You can’t believe a historical event so you call it AI HOLY LARP. Im gathering infos online and putting them in notepad in one place bc they cant fit in a twitter reply, a d ur delusional because they contradict everything you said till now so ur calling it AI lmaoo holy cope
Billions Must Love tweet media
English
0
0
0
9
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress LMAO WHAT. How are they different? Uncreated, uncaused, and existing in being and nature are all PROPERTIES OF THE NATURE, not of the person. So 3 of the same nature would have the same properties
English
0
0
0
3
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress "but HE (THE SON YOU SAY?) was always uncreated, uncaused, and existing in being and nature." None of these apply to the Son , if you're saying both Persons have these qualities , you have 2 Gods
English
1
0
1
8
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress How early church fathers would look at you if you tell them that there was once a time where the Son was not, the Son is not co-equal with the Father, or that the Son was caused and created in nature and that he had a beginning 😭😭✌️💔🥀
Billions Must Love tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress No both Justin & Tertullian & others would believe you guys are polytheists as only the Father is "Very God" & the Most high God & would choose smth like semi-arianism with from the same substance. Your belief wasn't present in the 2-3 century
English
3
0
0
20
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress Not a single early church father believed that the Son had a beginning of being and nature, but he had a beginning of person. Not a single father believed that the Father was once without a son.
English
1
0
0
5
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress The same Justin that said the Son = God? Who called Son, God without a beginning? I think he would stand with me in this one lmao. And i called Arian a heretic, who is more of a retard than a church father, and celsus who is a pagan not a church father lmao are u schizophrenic
English
1
0
0
15
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress x.com/i/status/20690… Yeah of course you didn't you dogcrap , hence why according to Justin you're of the lowest of intelligence ,congratulations buddy ✌️
GIF
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01

@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress "He can"Can God" is blasphemy you are assuming that there are things God cannot do" - "he who has but the smallest intelligence will not venture to assert that the Maker and Father of all things,having left all supercelestial matters,was visible on a little portion of the earth"

English
1
0
0
30
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress “Begotten by will” = Justin means not by force/sexuality like pagan gods. Will = eternal decision, not time event. Same Justin calls Son “God” Dial 128 and “without beginning” Dial 61. Justin showed Son = YHWH of OT, not a second God
English
1
0
0
2
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress "Meaning TWO NATURES OF YHWH" Trypho literally says he would have walked away if Justin didn't believe the Father was the most high God and maker of all things & if he didn't use the scriptures. He wasn't saying the Son was equal to the Father, he literally was Begotten by will
GIF
English
2
0
0
15
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress 1. “Jesus = God” + “Father alone unbegotten” = Nicene Trinity. 1 nature, 3 persons. That’s exactly the formula. 2. “called Fathers heretics”. I didn’t. I said Arius = heretic. If you’re using them to prove Son created, then you make them Arian. That’s on you, not me.
English
1
0
0
11
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress That's literally my point this whole time you dogshit ,jesus being "God" doesn't prove nicene trinitarianism. Mf how dumb can you even be at this point. At the beginning says all these Fathers are heretics , five minutes laters after being xooked , acts like he has read them 🤣🥀
English
1
0
0
15
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress MF there’s books on “functional subordination” ≠ “ontological subordination” 🤣 Early Fathers: Father ALONE = unbegotten source of person. OF PERSON. NOT OF NATURE. BEGOTTEN SON IN PERSON NOT IN NATURE Also Early Fathers: Son = eternal, no beginning. John 1:1 “WAS God”.
English
0
0
0
2
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress MF THERE'S LITERALLY BOOKS WRITTEN ON THE SUBORDINATIONISM OF THE EARLY FATHERS like Justin YOU DOGSHIT 🤣🤣 you say the Son has no beginning , while all the early ones say The Father ALONE has no beginning. Stop embarrassing yourself at this point
English
1
0
0
9
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress EXACTLY WHAT I SAID “Son caused” = eternally begotten, no beginning = “Son caused” = made in time = Arianism = anathematized SON IS CAUSED IN PERSON. UNCAUSED IN NATURE. THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME I SAY IT
English
1
0
0
8
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress No he literally believed it was another God and Lord , a lesser God which could appear as seen in philo. Justin also says as the others " FOR GOD ALONE IS UNBEGOTTEN AND THEREFORE HE IS GOD, ALL OTHER THINGS AFTER HIM ARE CREATED AND CORRUPTIBLE"
Bazza™🇵🇸 tweet media
English
4
0
0
23
Billions Must Love
Billions Must Love@NewOrder369·
@MagomedB01 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress Justin Dial. 56: “another God and Lord” = distinct person, same nature. Greek allos = another of same kind, not heteros = different kind. “God alone unbegotten”=Father’s person, not Son’s nature. 2 lines later Justin calls Son “God” + “Lord of hosts”. Same YHWH, different person
English
0
0
0
3
Bazza™🇵🇸
Bazza™🇵🇸@MagomedB01·
@NewOrder369 @Ispitzionist @MacaronEmpress Because all authority has been given to him including the name of God? MF not even the Cappadocian Fathers who were the opponents of Arianism , didn't think/say the Son was UNCAUSED , THEY LITERALLY SAID THE SON WAS CAUSED. You're literally saying there's 2 uncaused beings
Bazza™🇵🇸 tweet mediaBazza™🇵🇸 tweet mediaBazza™🇵🇸 tweet mediaBazza™🇵🇸 tweet media
English
3
0
0
10