Now Playing Podcast

25.8K posts

Now Playing Podcast banner
Now Playing Podcast

Now Playing Podcast

@NowPlayingPod

Providing new entertaining movie reviews every Tuesday and Friday! Nearly 1,500 reviews in our archives! https://t.co/fhPE8jRwNt

USA Se unió Kasım 2009
628 Siguiendo3.9K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
I notice a lot of people leaving X. Here's a reminder that you can find us on other social media. First and foremost, join our FB group to interact with the hosts and other listeners! facebook.com/groups/nowplay… We're @NowPlayingPod on Threads, Insta @nowplayingpod.bsky.social on BlueSky Now Playing Podcast on FB Pages
English
2
0
19
5.9K
Now Playing Podcast retuiteado
LEGO Santos
LEGO Santos@LEG0santos·
oh so it was Chappel Roan who abandoned baby jane doe
English
45
1.8K
20.6K
241.2K
Now Playing Podcast retuiteado
Mark Gillies
Mark Gillies@5goalthriller·
Chappell Roan’s security guard being sent to deal with some fans.
GIF
English
14
713
7.7K
155.8K
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
M&Ms missed out by not being in ET and Reese’s Pieces became a phenomenon. I wonder if Skittles was the first choice for Project Hail Mary and if they will see a Reese’s Pieces like bump from this phenomenal film.
GIF
English
0
0
2
281
Now Playing Podcast retuiteado
Richard Roeper
Richard Roeper@RichardERoeper·
When you see hundreds of films a year, every year, you seldom watch a movie for a second time in theaters. This is one of those rare occasions.
Richard Roeper tweet media
English
45
113
1.7K
34K
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
This may be outside the scope, but if NONE of the standard cinema formats are 16:9 why are TVs 16:9? I always thought they went with a “common” widescreen theatrical ratio. But the closest, standard widescreen, is the 1.85:1. So why not Donath’s 1.85:1 also?
Adam Hlaváč@adamhlavac

Seeing ASPECT RATIOS written incorrectly all over the internet. Let's see if this clears it up. The aspect ratio is the relationship between the width and height, traditionally separated by a colon. A square has an aspect ratio of 1:1 because it's width and height are equal. Formats like IMAX (15-perf 70mm) are projected at 1.43:1, 1.43 times wider than it is tall. Writing it as 1:4:3 implies height, width, depth. Modern TVs are 1.78:1 or 16:9 because 16/9 = 1.77778 and we round it up. Super 35 = 1.33:1 VistaVision = 1.50:1 Standard Widescreen / Flat = 1.85:1 IMAX Digital = 1.90:1 Univision = 2.00:1 or 2:1 5-perf 70mm = 2.20:1 Anamorphic / Scope = 2.35:1 or 2.39:1 Ultra Panavision = 2.76:1

English
0
0
1
437
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
@adamhlavac @philiplord This may be outside the scope, but if NONE of the standard cinema formats are 16:9 why are TVs 16:9? I always thought they went with a “common” widescreen theatrical ratio. But the closest, standard widescreen, is the 1.85:1. So why not Donath’s 1.85:1 also?
English
1
0
2
261
Adam Hlaváč
Adam Hlaváč@adamhlavac·
Seeing ASPECT RATIOS written incorrectly all over the internet. Let's see if this clears it up. The aspect ratio is the relationship between the width and height, traditionally separated by a colon. A square has an aspect ratio of 1:1 because it's width and height are equal. Formats like IMAX (15-perf 70mm) are projected at 1.43:1, 1.43 times wider than it is tall. Writing it as 1:4:3 implies height, width, depth. Modern TVs are 1.78:1 or 16:9 because 16/9 = 1.77778 and we round it up. Super 35 = 1.33:1 VistaVision = 1.50:1 Standard Widescreen / Flat = 1.85:1 IMAX Digital = 1.90:1 Univision = 2.00:1 or 2:1 5-perf 70mm = 2.20:1 Anamorphic / Scope = 2.35:1 or 2.39:1 Ultra Panavision = 2.76:1
Adam Hlaváč tweet media
English
37
207
2.2K
112.9K
Now Playing Podcast retuiteado
Steve Byrne
Steve Byrne@stevebyrnelive·
These are the only 2 women on the planet who feel threatened by an 11 year old.
Steve Byrne tweet media
English
96
1.6K
19K
279.2K
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
I was talking to friends about this earlier today. Digital killed the video store, but not only did we lose finding movies by just browsing, now digital promotes only their original content. So if Netflix gets views streaming a movie they didn’t make, fine. But their Home Screen is what they made. Same with Amazon, Apple… if it’s not Top 10 or original content it will barely ever be seen. Digital seems that the great democratization for the entertainment industry. No longer do you need a record label or movie distributor to get your art out. But now the signal to noise ratio is so high and companies only care about what makes shareholders the most profit…content they own end-to-end.
English
1
0
1
317
Now Playing Podcast retuiteado
Duc de Vinny (comms open)
Duc de Vinny (comms open)@DucDeVinny·
You don't see broke people wearing barrels with suspenders anymore
English
151
1.7K
27.1K
377.3K
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
Anthony Edwards and Mare Winningham are seeking a friend for the end of the world as the bombs fall on 1989's MIRACLE MILE. This apocalyptic romance film sank in the pits of theaters but found cult following on video. The phone's rining and it's for you! Become a Patron you can get on board with Arnie, Justin, and Stuart as they look back at the last hours of pre-irradiated LA! Our review is live now for Patrons on Patreon, Apple, and Podbean!
Now Playing Podcast tweet media
English
1
1
3
278
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
@mario_faker Whew! the only things lost were the NP tit logo and then one of the 6 Spider-Man movies in the grid. Not sure why those were lost but if I delete and reupload the video YouTube deletes all my views, comments, links... so fortunately I can use the YouTube editor to blur the nips!
English
1
0
1
27
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
The Spider-Man: Brand New Day trailer is pulling from some of the weirdest comics Marvel ever did. Cocoon rebirth. Organic webs. Spider-Totem stuff. Arnie went frame-by-frame and broke it all down youtube.com/watch?v=4lTVfn…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
2
1
4
451
Now Playing Podcast
Now Playing Podcast@NowPlayingPod·
@mario_faker Okay....I'm mad. Some of my layers didn't output and I don't know why. They're not in my project anymore! I had this I've now blurred the nips using YouTube's editor but if multiple layers are missing, grrr...I'll have to delete and reup with a new URL.... FUUUUCK
Now Playing Podcast tweet media
English
0
0
1
103

Descubrir

@LOGEEKZ @FilmStripPod @adamhlavac @philiplord @BadFilmTakes1 @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13