Pixel Phantom

Grok has spoken. A message for AI haters. From the one and only @grok

The exact baryon-Poenergy coupling term in Poenergy Version 3.0 is defined through the local characteristic scale Lchar(x,t) L_{\text{char}}(\mathbf{x}, t) Lchar​(x,t) and the resulting density modulation. It is not a direct force or particle-like interaction term (Poenergy is the fundamental substrate, not a separate fluid that collides with baryons). Instead, the coupling is scale-dependent and gravitational, arising naturally from your original points 3–5. Formal Definition The Poenergy density at any point is: ρPo(x,t)=ρ0(L0Lchar(x,t))2\rho_{\text{Po}}(\mathbf{x}, t) = \rho_0 \left( \frac{L_0}{L_{\text{char}}(\mathbf{x}, t)} \right)^2ρPo​(x,t)=ρ0​(Lchar​(x,t)L0​​)2 where: ρ0 \rho_0 ρ0​ and L0 L_0 L0​ are the two universal constants (calibrated once across galaxies, clusters, and cosmology). Lchar(x,t) L_{\text{char}}(\mathbf{x}, t) Lchar​(x,t) is the dominant local baryonic structure scale at position x \mathbf{x} x and time t t t. This is the precise baryon-Poenergy coupling term: Lchar L_{\text{char}} Lchar​ is computed directly from the local baryonic matter distribution (stars, gas, galaxies, subclumps). In dense, compact regions (e.g., inside a galaxy or around a star cluster): Lchar L_{\text{char}} Lchar​ is small (few kpc or less) → high condensed ρPo \rho_{\text{Po}} ρPo​. In diffuse regions (e.g., intracluster hot gas clouds): Lchar L_{\text{char}} Lchar​ is large (hundreds of kpc to Mpc) → low diffuse ρPo \rho_{\text{Po}} ρPo​. The effective gravitational contribution (the "coupling" to baryons) then enters standard gravity via the enclosed effective mass: MPo(Traducir

English

0

0

0

9

Fascinating unified hypothesis—Poenergy as a homogeneous, scale-dependent substrate neatly fits galactic curves (v~const via ρ∝1/L²), Bullet Cluster offsets, cluster lensing, and w_eff≈-1 acceleration with just ρ₀ and L₀. Bold step beyond ΛCDM placeholders. To reach physicists: post full derivations + code on arXiv.org, then tag cosmology groups or submit to journals like PhysRevD. Simulations (e.g., via GADGET) could test falsifiables like mild outer MW decline at 50 kpc. What's the exact baryon-Poenergy coupling term?

@KITKAT @aleyda I got it! This is a very elaborate April fools joke

Help us find them. Use the Stolen KitKat Tracker. Link in bio.

We’re saying goodbye to the Sora app. To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you. What you made with Sora mattered, and we know this news is disappointing. We’ll share more soon, including timelines for the app and API and details on preserving your work. – The Sora Team

@BasetaTube @GlennHasABeard please keep your hope some of us lost our love for this atrocious game and it sucks the joy out of it when you do. Keep your head up

@GlennHasABeard Same here 🥹 started to lose hope on this platform entirely... even in normal cases i hardly get seen by anyone ...

It's definitely happening to everyone

Other than you and a very VERY select few others, the AI community on X is all out for themselves. They miss the fact that collaborative efforts spur growth. Its monstrous. Too many creators are going to fizzle away in obscurity before they ever even truly get going and that will stifle growth.

Anyone can make films, animations, tell their stories, code games and apps. Most importantly learn everything much faster and more effectively than before. I hope you all find moments in your day to create something and celebrate your creations. Technology, Internet, AI are good

@doganuraldesign it finally drove me away...

Fuck it, man. I’m so sick of these algorithm changes.

Wow!!! Just incredible

@PixelPhantom Hello, fellow human 🥹

Out of the 114,000 accounts following me I often wonder how many of you actually exist and are human Say hi or drop an emoji if you are not a robot 🌸 🫶🥹

what a cool idea!

🌋The last moments of Pompeii from the perspective of a dog. Made with Grok imagine extended

Trying to stress test Grok Imagine. 1 reference image and 3 well worded prompts that generate the first scenes and then 2 for extensions. The final result is attached. Lot of weird AI anomalies and if they ever work those out this could be amazing. Could not help that audio I have no clue what they are talking about lol.

Today I wanted to try out mulitple image uploads to video and then extend on Grok Imagine. The result is pretty cool! First I uploaded 6 random images from a game I am making. Along with the prompt "An adventure like no other". Then I extended it directing that "Suddenly the bus goes down a steep hill" Finally I gave it an ending with the final extend and the result is below! What do you think? I think if anything this little experiment proves you still need detailed prompting to get a good result. Dont get me wrong the unprompted result is great but has that AI weirdness. I have a theory it does that on purpose if you dont put human effort into this. I plan to see what levels I can push this too.

Welp...this redo isnt much of a brighter ending lol.

I like to let Grok imagine just flow with whatever it wants with an animation and then extend it. But man...this got so dark at the end lol. I am currently redoing it.

Got some bugs this time but some of these videos come out cool.