PolkTech Solutions

@poopybutt2009 @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Context..read all eph 2... Gentiles were once not part of Israel (v 13) now they ARE. Israel wasn't done away with. There are no Jews/gentiles, there is one bride in Christ. Christ who keeps the law, so should those in him. Does Jesus keep the law still? Of course he does!

@PolkTech @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Amen! Gentiles are partakers of the New Covenant, because the Mosaic Covenant is finished. Gentiles do not become Israel. John 19:30 Ephesians 2:15

Pork has NEVER been food at any time in history! It was and still is UNCLEAN according to scripture! Stop listening to the worldly churches and just read the Bible for what it says and do it! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

@poopybutt2009 @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Except the new covenant IS WITH the house of Judah and Israel. The gentiles are grafted into Israel, or did you not read that? The marriage was nullified when the bride and groom (Yeshua) died. He gives a new marriage but not one jot or tittle passes away. He still keeps the law.

@PolkTech @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Then the LORD said to Moses, "Write down these words, for in accordance with these words I have made a covenant [the Law of Moses; the covenant that was disannulled with the New Covenant] with you and with Israel." Exodus 34:27

@poopybutt2009 @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Yea...a covenant is not The Law.... The law is what allows a marriage covenant to be valid .. hence why the old bride/groom had to die, nullifying the old priesthood... Hence why it's a new marriage where he is bride/groom/priest. But the LAW is eternal and he still keeps it.

@PolkTech @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Did you read those verses? It's a New Covenant.

@poopybutt2009 @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Did you read those verses? It's a new covenant, NOT a new law...in fact the law (the same one) gets written on their hearts .... It's not a new law it's a new marriage covenant because the previous priests and bride were sinful, not the law..

@PolkTech @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH "Law is eternal" - but not the Law of Moses. See Jeremiah 31:31 and Hebrews 8:8.

@poopybutt2009 @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH That's good. Read it in context is better. Satan quotes scriptures but does it out of context. Don't let yourself be deceived by things that violate the perfect eternal law of YHVH that even now Jesus keeps (it's why he doesn't drink from the cup until he returns). Law is eternal

@PolkTech @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Just reading the Bible dude.

@poopybutt2009 @ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH Jesus is YHVH.... YHVH doesn't sin. Even if you believe the cross did away with his perfect eternal law (which Jesus said it did not) but even if you pretend it did, this was PRE cross... Thus the Law remained .. your idea has a logic problem. You're stating Jesus literally sin

@ChadHudson77 @FortheLOVEofYAH The entire passage, including the controversial phrase regarding Jesus proclaiming all foods clean, is found in the earliest manuscripts including Codex Sinaiticus.

@Mrstread_naught @FortheLOVEofYAH Nope. Exodus 12 tells you how....

@FortheLOVEofYAH To celebrate it biblically all men must pilgrimage to Jerusalem, give the proper sacrifice of a goat at twilight. The 7 day festival of unleavened bread follows remember the offerings every day!

Please stop listening to your church and just read your Bible! 🙏🏼

@PracticalTheolo Yet you can't answer HOW YHVH died according to His own laws demands in Det 24. Maybe your dogma is incorrect. I didn't write Det 24, it's his law. If you have a premise problem, take it up with the author.

@PolkTech Poorly formed questions don't have answers, except to point out you have a mistaken premise in your question.

It is time to put Trinitarians on notice, as if this isn't obvious enough: the theory they were fed is a *competitor* to other theories, and so must be evaluated alongside those other theories. To say: "but we can explain such-and-such with our convoluted theory!" about some verse is completely unsatisfactory. They instead have to go to the metal of scripture, and show how their theory is not just coherent (that's the bare minimum!) but *better* than the Unitarian ones, verse by verse and on the whole, probabilistically.

@PracticalTheolo God's law is eternal. Clean and unclean (one example) predates Abraham himself...so, yea. YHVH keeps his eternal law because it is his character. You're blessed if you keep it too. You've given lots of rejection based on your feelings but no counter arguments.

@PolkTech The Mosaic Law is a covenant *between* Yahweh and the ancient Israelites. The laws are for the ancient Israelites. *If* they follow those things, *then* Yahweh will bless them in certain ways. If Yahweh does those things, then Yahweh will bless Himself? Makes no sense.

This is as close to admitting Trinitarianism isn't scriptural as Oliver is ever going to get. 😂

@PracticalTheolo Actually it really does when you realize that Jesus is Yahweh and he says that Yahweh is the one true God. The very scripture that you might use to try to disprove the Trinity perfectly demonstrates it. When I don't feel like exercising my will becomes the Lord of my body

@PolkTech The *first* law of the 10 commandments is that Yahweh is 'your Lord'. Is Yahweh His own Lord? It makes no sense.

@JamesDelotis I guess it's only wrong if you refuse to look at truth. The Trinity is as simple to understand as almost anything. It's not a contradiction. It's not that there are three individual gods. There's one Yahweh just like your one person but three distinct parts of you.

@PolkTech Then why is your conclusion so wrong?

When the Son is not the father and the father is not the son and the son is not the Holy Spirit and the Holy Spirit is not the father, but each of them are God - you my friend have cooked yourself up a three god pantheon.

@PracticalTheolo What are you even talking about? Of course he is bound by his own law. Too violate the law is to be sin. Does he lie? No because he doesn't violate his law and he is truth. Does he covet no does he do anything contrary to the law? No it is the Constitution of his kingdom.

@PolkTech Of course Yahweh isn't bound by the Mosaic Law, which was intended for humans. It's like saying if a parent tells their child the child can't drive, therefore the parent can't drive.

@broitzcheese @JamesDelotis , if you have 15 personalities you're probably demon possessed. All humans are born with a spirit which is your will, a physical body which has its own desires, and emotions which are not part of your spirit or your body. I'm not sure how you're failing to see this reality.

@PolkTech @JamesDelotis what if i have 15 personalities? am i still 3 persons? how many wills would that equate to? an emphatic swing and a miss.

@broitzcheese @JamesDelotis "persons" in quotes is what i said. Your emotions can be "against" you working out, your body sore and tired not wanting to work out, your will forces them both to workout. Your not three spirits/entities. You're three "persons" in one. Its not a swing and miss, its self evident.

@PolkTech @JamesDelotis will and emotions aren’t persons. those are properties of persons that cannot exist apart from my nature. swing and a miss.

@PracticalTheolo Hebrews defines sin as violation of the Law.. You're now, for dogma sake, saying YHVH doesn't obey His law... that he gave..that is eternal and perfect...Yea, Det 24 makes it clear if YHVH married Israel and divorced her, he would need to die for her new marriage to be legal

@PolkTech Sorry, the Mosaic Law wasn't a law for Yahweh Himself. It's a law for humans. The premise of your argument seems pretty questionable, tbh. But even given that premise, no idea why you think Yahweh would have to die.

@PracticalTheolo He said he would divorce. Jesus said it's a new marriage covenant. You have a law problem if Jesus isn't YHVH. He can't say divorce and not do it to the letter of his law, that would be sin. He HAD to do it that way. Opinions are not above the law. Whats my misunderstanding?

@PolkTech No ... Yahweh puts His bride away for adultery. You're misreading the point of Jer. 3:8.

@PracticalTheolo Det 24... YHVH had to die as the "first husband" for the bride to remarry legally ... Otherwise the bride is still adulteresses.... Jesus was YHVH in the flesh and died. Allowing the bride to remarry. John baptised Yeshua making him a legal rep for the bride .. she died too.

@PolkTech No, Mosaic Law doesn't require the groom to die. I'm not sure why you're saying this.

@PracticalTheolo That's him giving her the bill...no different then hosea when he said he will (after Jeremiah) divorce her. He had the intention. That doesn't tell you WHEN and HOW. He has to obey his law. The law requires the groom (YHVH) to die and the bride to die. This was the crosses role.

@PolkTech I guess Yahweh divorces Israel at Jeremiah 3:8. Is that what you're asking?