QAwerk

1.4K posts

QAwerk banner
QAwerk

QAwerk

@QAwerk

Software testing agency - Helping businesses attain impeccable software quality Since 2015

Ukraine Se unió Nisan 2016
2.3K Siguiendo508 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
🏆 QAwerk is proud to be recognized as one of the top service companies in the world by being on IAOP’s Global Outsourcing 100 list (@IAOP). But what does this award mean, and why is it so important in our industry? 👉 Check out our latest article: bit.ly/iaop-global-ou…
English
1
0
2
309
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
everyone wants to be an AI power user rn nobody talks about automation bias that quiet thing where u stop thinking because the AI thought for u most dangerous professional in 2026 isn't ignoring AI it's the one who outsourced their judgment to it stay sharp.
English
0
0
1
12
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
EPAM just trademarked "Agentic QA™" good QA engineers have been doing this for 2 years calling it synergy doesn't make it a methodology just makes it a press release.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
12
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
your e-gov firewall wasn't built for AI attackers. not even close. nation-state AI agents in 2026 don't brute force — they adapt, evade, impersonate. legacy tools are blind to it. wrong question: "are we secure?" right question: "can our defenses outpace AI?"
English
0
0
0
8
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
AI made devs faster but QA didn't get faster so now you ship more bugs, faster congratulations on the velocity
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
7
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
everyone says AI will replace QA engineers nah AI writes tests for code that's well-documented human testers find bugs in logic nobody wrote down that's still most of the job tool gets better, bar gets higher.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
everyone's launching "agentic QA platforms" now but who tests the agents doing the testing? this is the wrong question to automate your way out of
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
everyone's talking about the AI test automation market growth nobody's talking about how half these tools fail on real legacy code AI is great at finding obvious bugs bad at finding the ones that matter the hype is real the tools are catching up slowly.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
everyone building AI agents in closed ecosystems think they own the future they own a very expensive demo open protocols aren't idealism they're just good engineering.
QAwerk tweet media
English
1
0
0
2
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
crypto platforms racing to deploy AI agents everyone wants to ship first nobody asks who's testing it speed without QA is just a faster way to break things
QAwerk tweet media
English
1
0
1
12
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
banks are using AI to ship code faster but QA teams stayed the same size that's not acceleration that's backlog for bugs speed without testing is just faster failure.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
"top 10 QA companies" lists measure revenue, headcount, marketing spend not: how many releases they actually saved wrong metric.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
a trillion-euro insurer scaling test automation to ship faster if aegon is doing this there's no more excuses for your team "we have legacy" "we have compliance" "we have risk" so did they. automation isn't expensive. not automating was.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
meta's AI safety director lost control of her AI agent ppl act surprised but the real issue: nobody knows what agents do between "start" and "done" black box with db access is insane.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
1
8
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
your AI test suite is green. your dashboards look great. but who's testing what the AI wasn't trained to expect? automating confidence ≠ automating quality. that's the blind spot nobody wants to admit rn.
English
0
0
0
5
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
"doctors will vibe code their own tools" maybe but vibe coding = trusting code you didn't read fine for a meal planner not fine when the bug touches patient data the vibe is great. the stakes aren't equal.
QAwerk tweet media
English
1
0
0
12
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
ppl keep saying AI agents will replace QA teams wrong question the real question is: who tests the agents? because they fail in ways no classic autotest catches non-deterministic. context-dropping. confidently wrong. trusting automation to test automation insane.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
"manual testing is dead" nope automation = breadth, speed, repetition manual = depth, logic, context you need both spellcheck doesn't replace an editor.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
40
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
one marketer + claude code = entire growth team everyone: the future is here me: cool, what were the API costs demos scale. production costs money.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
AI code ships fast. then nobody knows what anything does. then senior devs leave. the problem isn't AI. it's zero guardrails. review for intent, not just function. treat AI output like a 3rd-party dep. give engineers time to refactor it. code ownership = retention.
English
0
0
0
6
QAwerk
QAwerk@QAwerk·
everyone rushing to build AI agents but ask them what problem it solves long pause the bottleneck is never the tech.
QAwerk tweet media
English
0
0
0
2