Romsty

5.6K posts

Romsty

Romsty

@Romsty

Se unió Mayıs 2014
178 Siguiendo1.3K Seguidores
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
They probably have better bets in this shitty macro sentiment. But let's not forget that Softbank also drop $NVDA right before Nvidia pump🤷‍♂️. It is what it is... they just played retail and move somewhere else. Nothing change in terms of long term vision.
English
0
0
1
41
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
The explanation for such drop after earnings on $LMND is most likely related to some big institution that sold a big share (Softbank or Blackrock eg.). That drop happend in 3 mins. They felt $75 was a good exit point for the guidance presented.
Sam Badawi@Sam_Badawi

Even after an amazing quarter, $LMND sold off about 20% from peak to trough. We saw the same setup with $APP and $RDDT, both dropping roughly 25% and 20% respectively from their earnings-report highs to the subsequent lows. High-beta names are not getting any love in this environment.

English
1
0
0
244
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@jmysct0 Nothing they can do will change this AI narrative. I would like to understand how they will turn around the sentiment.
English
1
0
1
25
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@PaperBagInvest Agv. of 12$ here and not selling 💪 I'm in since IPO and following you since COVID peak. After all these pessimistic years it's amazing to see how things turned around. But one thing we're sure of. $LMND was an easy bet when looking to risk-reward. 10$🤑 x.com/i/status/15567…
Romsty@Romsty

@FradeDuarte Not that risky. I mean, the risk is always there of course but $LMND has a great product with a lot of potential to disrupt the entire insurance niche and it's valued for only ~1.5B. Let's hope for better numbers from now on 🤞

English
0
0
1
99
Paper Bag Investor
Paper Bag Investor@PaperBagInvest·
$LMND is up almost $14 today. Who remembers when it traded at just $14?
English
24
2
198
4.9K
kEllo
kEllo@soloMID_·
.@DBCrypt0 might be the dumbest individual on this app Bro spent 2 years telling his followers that every metric on @solana is fake, now he admits that SOL is winning. The problem now is how we got here You are a failed influencoor, your followers are mostly <70 iq and the chain that you support so much (@MultiversX ) has been dead for 4 years. Literally 0 in every important metric You shilled 50+ tokens on different chains that all went to 0 You are poor, miserable and the only way you get engagement is if you talk about @solana Sit the fuck down you absolute pleb
kEllo tweet media
English
4
1
5
229
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@ARG_215 @lucianmincu because they need to drain investors a bit more. That's why. They went in full speed to develop it. Good luck to you if you're still holding $EGLD.
English
0
0
0
51
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
Well my prediction on when $BTC would reach the top was quite accurated. Just a few days difference. This chart was done like 2 years ago. Time to see now when we will get the new bottom for Bitcoin👀
Romsty@Romsty

🎉4th #Bitcoin halving is here!🍾 Historical data hints at a bullish trend until: May 5, 2025 - Sep 22, 2025. Will history repeat? If yes, what's the potential $BTC value surge from halving to bull peak? 👀 Past performances: 2013: 9,375% 2017: 11,180% 2021: 738%

English
0
0
2
337
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
$LMND was not risky 3 years ago and today is definitely way less risky after such great earnings 💪👏
Romsty@Romsty

@FradeDuarte Not that risky. I mean, the risk is always there of course but $LMND has a great product with a lot of potential to disrupt the entire insurance niche and it's valued for only ~1.5B. Let's hope for better numbers from now on 🤞

English
0
0
5
174
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@vinibarbosabr This guy is the ultimate $EGLD maxi. He did the exact same thing with me. He's such a people pleaser. He's so sick for attention that one day he even shared a picture of his kid in the hospital. I wished the kid a quick recovery but I felt embarrassed by such exposure.
English
2
0
4
251
Vini B |「 thecoding 」
Vini B |「 thecoding 」@vinibarbosabr·
Beware of @DBCrypt0 DB cowardly continues to launch his attacks against me I can't ignore it any longer So, today we will have a DB-dedicated thread (he was given many chances to step back from this behavior - by me and by neutral moderators - only to double down on them) +🧵
English
25
3
49
6.1K
Solver
Solver@solver_cs·
Let me just say this: on the address below you can see that one entity/person is controlling 108 addresses, holding a stake of around $1.6 mil. He/she/it, voted YES with all the wallets. Not to go further and say that 135 wallet controlled by 4 entities/persons hold a stake of almost $2.3 mil? All of them voted YES. Yes, everyone was aligned this time, but let's say someone else would have a proposal that is not aligned with the 4 entities. Please correct me if I am wrong. PS. Here are not included the team wallets or other validators that are aligned with the team. explorer.multiversx.com/accounts/erd1m…
English
4
0
5
442
Robert Sasu | dev/acc
Robert Sasu | dev/acc@SasuRobert·
To add on this: The distribution of YES and NO on all of the groups is relatively the same, being it whales, dolphins, fish and shrimp. Every group says >90% YES. some critics say that there are so many against MultiversX, or that the vote is rigged. NO, the vote is not rigged, all critics were heard, and we responded to everything. All doors were/are open to debate and discuss. I love the @MultiversX community, they show resilience, they came and listened and debated most of the points. The whole economics paper is in much better shape because of that. And the commitment is great. this cannot be twisted. the data is onchain. it is permissionless, decentralised, as everything needs to be.
Joe Wu@joewu_official

Many expressed that there's no point voting for the $EGLD economic proposal. No voting is ever going to be totally fair. Not within #Web3. Even outside Web3, elections are often tainted in some way. But participation is still important. Interesting stats by @Bearzilla01; a lot of smaller wallets are in fact also participating & voting. Many on X voice against the proposal. Regardless of the outcome, it would be really good to see a "true" reflection of how big the displeased crowd actually is through governance. Or perhaps they have already sold their #EGLD & only lingers & engages on X? #MultiversX

English
14
9
69
4.3K
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@solver_cs Nevertheless... EGLD holders have no real alternative to this. This is like a live or die moment. Even if they don't agree with this they know it's their last hope.
English
2
0
9
245
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@solver_cs Number of wallets is different from the number of independent individuals. You don't know how many from those wallets are somehow controlled by the team directly or indirectly. Which I'm pretty sure there will be a considerable voting power there since they hate transparency 😉
English
3
1
15
593
Solver
Solver@solver_cs·
🗳Status on the MultiversX Economic Evolution Vote 🚩Important Note: this is based only on votes coming from normal staking excluding the liquid staking voters. Also it doesn't contain all the data, vote is still in process, anything can change. Out of 1,136 wallets that participated until the moment of the analysis, the 30 largest wallets (>20,000 EGLD staked) controlled 49.5% of the total voting power, almost equal to the remaining 1,106 wallets combined. Despite this concentration, both large and small holders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the proposal: ✅ Yes: 94.5% (2.73 M EGLD) ❌ No: 5.5% (158 K EGLD) This means that even though voting power is highly concentrated, the community was united across all segments: large and small holders aligned in support of the decision. ⚠️ Disclaimer: This data is based on publicly available on-chain information and may contain errors or omissions. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent official voting results. #MultiversX #Governance #EGLD #DeFi
Solver tweet media
English
19
10
65
5.6K
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
We don't have VCs money 💪 We have retail investors money instead 😘 Why? Because these idiots are funding us without us giving them anything in exchange. Sorry, actually we give something... a token that we can squeeze and a false sense of governance. Best deal ever 😍
English
0
1
9
369
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@Bearzilla01 @MultiversX So... Assuming this is true... They were burning over $20M per year and still didn't achieve any great milestone. Now with less than 1/3 of that budget will they be able to make MultiversX great again? Right lol Will be inflation that will save them for sure 🤦
English
3
0
4
407
Bearzilla $FEDUP 🤡 #SRB🐻#R.I.F.T
The @MultiversX Foundation has released it’s first report in 5 years of Mainnet It contains 12 pages that is mostly graphics and a bit of writing, it covers 2024-2025 Q3 Let’s do a quick breakdown The Good The Foundation has a Treasury budget of $ 105 million , that is good enough for 5-10 years. The budget has 65% stocks and equity reserves , 30% is in EGLD and 5% in stables The stocks are handled by a trust fund broker. The work force has been reduced by a third, from 125 people in 2024 to 85 people at present This shows that they are taking steps to be competitive, I’m sure this can be reduced further to improve sustainability. The bad This is a very flimsy report, there is no onchain data ( this a L1 blockchain…) , no detailed analysis It’s missing data from 2020-2024 , there is no proof of reserves It’s all trust me bro, it’s just written in here The Treasury relies heavily on EGLD as an asset, 30% is a big chunk, consider new emission and inflation coming It touches on transparency but offers only a little. Overall I think it’s a good starting point
Bearzilla $FEDUP 🤡 #SRB🐻#R.I.F.T tweet mediaBearzilla $FEDUP 🤡 #SRB🐻#R.I.F.T tweet mediaBearzilla $FEDUP 🤡 #SRB🐻#R.I.F.T tweet mediaBearzilla $FEDUP 🤡 #SRB🐻#R.I.F.T tweet media
MultiversX Foundation@multiversxfndn

In line with our commitment to openness and accountability, the MultiversX Foundation is releasing its first State of the Foundation Report. The goal is to give $EGLD stakeholders a clear understanding of how resources are managed, how we’ve navigated challenging markets, and how we’re positioned for the next phase of growth. It provides a concise snapshot of where we stand today: lean, focused, and ready to accelerate with Supernova, the new economic model, and our U.S. expansion. A second edition covering fiscal years 2024 and 2025 will follow in Q1 of next year. files.multiversx.com/MultiversxX-St…

English
9
5
88
8.5K
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
I'll let the comments with you because at this stage I'm not surprised by their levels of arrogance anymore. #MultiversX 💀
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu

@Justin_Bons Thanks, Justin, for your efforts and input. One small note after running your text through a psychological lens, here's what came out: “The author is a disillusioned idealist turned activist critic.” Might be interesting to have your AI help you reflect on that.

English
5
1
15
1.6K
GRM
GRM@grm_off·
I don't think I care about #MultiversX anymore, and those who are still there deserve what they get. Is it serious, doctor? 😱
English
20
2
34
3.8K
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
I'm wondering if everything is fine with @Davyegld? Does anyone know? His last tweet is from mid September and I didn't notice his participation in any of the latest $EGLD discussions about the new economy purpose. #multiversx
English
5
1
12
1.9K
Romsty
Romsty@Romsty·
@wdrewcurry @Davyegld You're taking my tweet with bad intentions. FYI, Davy and I worked together and he's the only "maxi" I respect here even though we don't share the same opinion in multiple points. I do care and that's why I'm tweeting to see if someone knows anything about him.I hope he's well.
English
1
0
1
242
drew.erd⚡️@EGLDHeist
drew.erd⚡️@EGLDHeist@wdrewcurry·
It would be cool to have a humanHeartbeat app that we could voluntarily participate in that we would occassionally be pinged by such that we could reply with a preset list of replies, or a custom one, such that peeps can discern when somebody may have had a situation that suddenly appeared such that they were no longer capable of continuing as-was. And to the account that i blocked who replied in a vicious manner in this thread, people like you, and unaccountable nonsense like that, something you would never say in real-life to a person's face, is just one of the reasons why social platforms are so damn toxic. I suggest you apologize and ask a human question or respond properly with a simple: I hope all is well with Davy!
English
1
0
2
336