Shomball

17.9K posts

Shomball banner
Shomball

Shomball

@ShomBall

Londoner. Inglourious Basterd, Jewish Resistance, סיקריים - If I'm after your shoe, you should worry. Tottenham Volley Ducks & MOUSSAD. 🇮🇱 🇬🇧🍌

Se unió Ekim 2023
1.9K Siguiendo777 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Shomball
Shomball@ShomBall·
@benhabib6 They murdered thousands by using incorrect, improper protocols. Proning. Ventilators. Life ending cocktails of drugs. They murdered my Dad who only had flu, which turned to pneumonia. They tagged it "Covid". Liars. Murderers. #NHS #Covid #UKGOVERNMENT #UKSAGE #Witty
English
0
2
4
519
Shomball
Shomball@ShomBall·
@JonahPlatt Because Low IQ, greedy, inherently violent, culturally backward, people aren't interested in peace, truth, learning or morality.. There you have it.
English
0
0
0
2
Jonah Platt
Jonah Platt@JonahPlatt·
What if Judaism became the world's fastest-growing religion? We have the wisdom, the ritual, the community, the roadmap to meaning. We're just not offering it to anyone. Why?
English
476
33
546
48.1K
Sophie Hurst
Sophie Hurst@Sophie_Hurst80·
@SimonFoxWriter Take my flag out of your profile. We're not 'far right', you'd know about it if we were. All 'Neo Nazis' are Feds. FACT! We're decent English people who are sick to death of the satanic Jewish banking cartel. Would you kill an Englishman for a Jew?
Sophie Hurst tweet media
English
4
0
11
210
Simon Fox
Simon Fox@SimonFoxWriter·
I need to sort of apologize to you all. In recent years I've suggested that the Far Right doesn't really exist in the UK. But recently on X I've seen evidence that they're real. The main thing they rant about is Jews. I think the Far Right are few in number, but they do exist.
English
26
6
95
2.1K
Eddie Abbott
Eddie Abbott@AbbottEddi5270·
Grab your socks and…. Well that’s for a different time!!!! Hold your hats and check this out!!! California April 2026 Now…. When I came out as a Whistleblower… Linda Moulton Howe got the 4 hour download of all kinds of stuff…. No one knew about at the time. This was one MAJOR piece of Information I gave her…. I told her how these craft can cloak themselves by creating a cloud that surrounds their craft but…… it maintains its shape as the Gravitational Field keeps the temporary cloud it produced….. encapsulated and therefore….. it doesn’t dissipate!!! They are above you now!! Trust me…. They are everywhere. Here is one perfect example of what you never would expect….. Listen…. This shit is real and….. it is cranking up at a massive rate…… This is what was captured…… @JonStewartIL
English
10
18
109
4.9K
Shomball retuiteado
Josh Hunt
Josh Hunt@iAmJoshHunt·
This one will require a stiff drink. In the early 1990s, the government came up with a clever idea. Instead of borrowing money cheaply to build hospitals, schools, and roads, it would get the private sector to build them and then pay the private sector back over 25 to 30 years. The Private Finance Initiative. PFI. The attraction was obvious. You got a shiny new hospital today. The bill didn't show up on the government's books. The cost was deferred into the future. Politicians got ribbon-cutting ceremonies without the awkward conversation about borrowing. It was, in effect, the nation's credit card. Buy now, pay later. Except the interest rate was extraordinary. The total capital value of everything built under PFI was around £50 billion. As of March 2024, there were 665 PFI contracts still running across the UK, with roughly £136 billion in remaining payments stretching out to the early 2050s. These are payments public bodies are contractually locked into. Hospitals, schools, councils, government departments. Paying for buildings that in many cases were constructed twenty or thirty years ago. And the terms are extraordinary. PFI contracts were structured so the private sector would not just build the facility but manage its services. Cleaning. Maintenance. Catering. Portering. These services are bundled into long-term contracts with built-in inflation increases that the public sector cannot renegotiate, cannot exit without paying massive penalties, and often cannot even fully scrutinise because of commercial confidentiality clauses. In one case raised in Parliament, a hospital was charged £333 to change a lightbulb. That isn't an urban myth. It was cited in Hansard. The NHS has been hit hardest. According to parliamentary analysis, the capital cost of NHS PFI projects was around £13 billion. The total repayments are estimated at around £80 billion. And the peak of NHS PFI annual repayments isn't even here yet. It arrives in 2029. The bills are still going up. In 2020-21, NHS trusts paid £457 million purely in interest charges on PFI contracts. Not services. Not maintenance. Interest. In the last five years, NHS trusts have handed over more than £1.8 billion in PFI interest alone. We Own It calculates that money would have covered the starting salaries of over 50,000 new doctors. One NHS trust, Essex Partnership, has reportedly paid back 27 times what was originally borrowed. Some hospitals are spending more on PFI repayments than on medicines for patients. And remember, these repayments come out of the same NHS budget that's supposed to fund patient care, staff, and equipment. Scotland got it just as badly. Audit Scotland reported that Scottish taxpayers will pay a cumulative £40 billion for PFI assets worth just £9 billion. North Ayrshire Council will have paid £440 million by 2038 for four schools that cost £83 million to build. Now here's what makes this worse. Many of these contracts are starting to expire. The buildings are being handed back to the public sector. And the NAO has warned of significant risks around the handback process, including cases where public bodies were dissatisfied with the condition of assets being returned to them. Decades of payments. And some of these buildings may come back needing significant further investment. So what actually happened? The government could have borrowed money at significantly lower rates to build these hospitals and schools itself. Sovereign borrowing has always been cheaper than private finance. Instead, it paid the private sector to borrow at a premium and passed the inflated cost on to the taxpayer. The private sector took the profit. The taxpayer took the risk. The buildings are now ageing. The debts are still being paid. And the services that were supposed to benefit are being squeezed partly because so much of their budget is locked into contractual obligations they cannot escape. PFI wasn't investment. It was an accounting trick. A way for governments to build things without the borrowing showing up in the national debt figures. It made politicians look fiscally responsible while loading future generations with obligations they had no say in and no ability to renegotiate. Both parties did this. The Conservatives created PFI in 1992. Labour massively expanded it after 1997. More than 700 projects were signed. The coalition eventually wound it down. The current government scrapped the latest version. But the contracts remain. The payments continue. And the damage is already done. This is what it looks like when a country chooses to buy its infrastructure on hire purchase instead of investing properly. You lock in above-market rates for decades. You lose control of the assets. You tie the hands of future governments. And when the bill keeps coming due, you're told there's no money for doctors, teachers, or social care. There was always money. It just went somewhere else.
English
212
1.6K
3.3K
175K
Shomball retuiteado
BB_MEDIA
BB_MEDIA@bb_media_uk·
To think our great grandparents died on that beach for our freedoms and now this is what's happening
English
169
1.2K
4.4K
78.5K
((Desert Plant))
((Desert Plant))@desertplant·
@ShomBall Asian here probably means Muslim students (Arabs, Pakistanis etc.) Students from the Far East, China, Korea, Japan, etc. have usually higher scores than white students and are also discriminated against in the name of DEI.
English
1
0
1
14
Shomball
Shomball@ShomBall·
Seems the 3rd world has hijacked the NHS too. Fucking disgusting.
.@BMM1882

11 hours or so later and we’re on our way out, thank God. I’ve genuinely had a better experience in a hospital in a developing country - not an exaggeration. Some very basic reflections (because I’ve been awake for 29 hours now): Clearly lots of pressure on the system - so many people who very obviously didn’t need A&E. When we eventually saw a doctor she acknowledged this herself and said it’s a big problem - alongside some other rather un-PC reflections… As an example, at about 04:30 we had to listen to a group (the patient had FIVE relatives with them - so much for the +1 policy) arguing with [we think - impossible to identify who does what as the scrubs seemingly weren’t colour coded] a nurse. I’m not sure who had worse English - the [presumed] nurse or the group. The crux of it seemed to be that the patient was fine but had a headache and was insisting on a prescription for paracetamol (which you can buy for 35p in a supermarket). Let’s not ignore the obvious fact - the waiting room was overwhelmingly (90%+) foreign - and I don’t just mean ‘not White British’. There were very few ‘Black British’ or ‘British Asian’ people - but rather lots of foreigners from recent migration waves. A mix of Somalis, EU legacy migrants (especially Eastern Europeans, mainly Romanian and Bulgarian), and Boriswavers. We seldom heard English being spoken. During the entire evening we saw approximately two other White British people - an elderly gentleman and a young lady who clearly had additional needs. It was sad to see them unaccompanied as both were clearly vulnerable, and we tried to advocate for them a little (asking for updates with their permission, getting water) alongside two other elderly people. Rather bizarre to see so few Britons given we’re in the capital city of… Britain. It was all a very Yookay experience. As I said earlier, I’ve had a better hospital visit in a literal developing country. This was genuinely third world levels of service, but then the clientele was in many ways rather third world, too. The lack of facilities was terrible. At about 03:00 I had to do a shop run to a nearby shop which was open overnight to get some drinks and snacks for some of the people we met. Two of the elderly people were desperately hungry so we did what we could. I remember A&E used to have a tea trolley that came around - apparently no longer. There was more crime and anti-social behaviour than I have enough characters to describe. Lots of arguments and one physical fight. A drug deal. The atmosphere was volatile and, whilst I’ve no doubt people will be along to dismiss what I am saying (so much for valuing “lived experience”) at times it genuinely felt unsafe. The presence of security staff did very little to alleviate this feeling. Four separate people were vaping inside the waiting room we were in (there were three waiting areas) and staff did not intervene. The department was very dirty and we didn’t see any cleaners. Somebody threw up on the floor and it was just left there. I will give credit where it’s due - the two clinicians Mum saw were very good. It was a 65 minute wait for triage in the end (which sort of defeats the point of triage) and then a very long wait to see a doctor - hence we’re just getting out now at around 09:00. We entered at just after 22:00 yesterday. The pharmacy was closed but this was a saving grace as it meant medication could be dispensed in the department. Some people were leaving with paper prescriptions so I can only assume it was dependent on the clinician a patient saw as to whether they got drugs or a prescription. But Mum was given her medication before we left so I also praise that. The seats… I don’t know who does procurement for furniture in that hospital, but the chairs were the most uncomfortable I’ve ever sat on. My back will not forgive me for this for a few days I suspect. There is a lot more I could say in my slightly delirious state, but I shall leave it there for now. Grim.

English
0
0
0
36
Shomball
Shomball@ShomBall·
@Nwotnot @EssexPR Many of those virtue signalling fetid old minging cunts visit 3rd world countries as sex tourists.
English
0
0
0
6
David Barber
David Barber @Nwotnot·
@EssexPR If any of these white liberal women supprting mass immigraton had actually *lived* in the countries from which the immigrants are coming, then their blinkers would be off...
English
2
0
16
281
Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧
The men that they are shipping into our communities are sex starved & a risk. What do you think happens as the months go by & they still haven’t found a woman willing to be intimate with them? Many come from places where women can’t say no, where women are 3rd class citizens.
English
166
887
4.3K
40.1K
Shomball retuiteado
Danny Tommo
Danny Tommo@RealDannyTommo·
In Epsom, Surrey, on Saturday night, a young woman was followed after leaving a nightclub and brutally raped by a group of men right outside the Church on Ashley Road. This horror must stop. Plans are already in motion. Preparations are underway. When the call comes, answer it, because next time it could be your daughter, your mother, or your wife walking those same streets. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! This ends NOW. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 ENGLAND MUST STAND NOW!
English
189
1.1K
4.8K
77.2K
Shomball
Shomball@ShomBall·
No. Only twats and Americans utter that twaddle.
Will Steele@YuteMcWallad

@OrientBraces That’s been around forever, what a weird thing to whine about. “Can a get a pint of ___ please” is such a completely normal phrase.

English
0
0
0
18
Dark Reactions
Dark Reactions@DarkReactions99·
@infinitehorus I was in Nepal where there were Jews celebrating it. At the time, I just couldn't understand it.
English
1
0
20
861
Horus
Horus@infinitehorus·
I was at university in Manchester when the September 11th attacks happened. Rusholme had a large Muslim population, now known to be a place where gangs of men have raped British children. The universities also had many Muslim students. Muslims I knew there were smug for days after. They thought it was funny, justified and long overdue. 'America' deserved to get hit hard in the face, they thought. Thus they celebrated the mass murder of civilians. The same types condoned the 7th July attacks in London. They treat these things as natural, justified reactions against what Western governments do. They simply saw themselves as at war with us. There is no allying with people like that. They despise us, the whole Western world, and they don't distinguish between us and our rulers.
English
35
202
1.7K
36.3K
Shomball retuiteado
Matt Goodwin
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ·
Keir Starmer & the Labour government are lying to you. They are NOT “closing down asylum hotels”. What they are doing is moving thousands of illegal migrants out of hotels into HMOs (Housing for Multiple Occupants) in your local communities. Paid for by … you. Companies like Serco are using YOUR money to outbid YOU in your own housing market. They are given more favourable contracts to take on illegal migrants over British people. It is utterly outrageous. And then Keir Starmer, Shabana Mahmood & Yvette Cooper lecture us about “fairness”. It is disgraceful. The British people are being forced to pay roughly £15 BILLION in these accommodation costs in the next few years. For people they never even asked to have in the country, who have broken our laws and put our women and children at risk. That’s enough for roughly 10 brand new large hospitals or 3,000 brand new primary schools. They are treating their own people with contempt. Enough. Vote Reform.
English
119
1.1K
3.6K
31.3K
Sam שמואל
Sam שמואל@Tzioni2·
@HeidiBachram My gut feeling is this is more psychological than political. A lot of people need something to be against. It gives them a target, a sense of belonging, and the feeling they’re on the good side, which then makes behaviour like this feel justified
English
1
0
33
1.2K
Heidi Bachram
Heidi Bachram@HeidiBachram·
Watch British tourists harass an Israeli couple in Vietnam. They sing “Boom boom Tel Aviv” and call them “rats”. They even invoke the Nazi trope of Jews being kicked out of “110 countries”. These pro-Pals are indistinguishable from Nazis now. I’m ashamed of them.
English
1.2K
1.1K
5.8K
335.2K
Shomball
Shomball@ShomBall·
20 million need to leave. At very least. Then the workshy need to be forced into work. We are fat too weak, far too naive and those who want to take the piss, DO.
Josh Hunt@iAmJoshHunt

Let me walk you through the arithmetic of Britain's demographic crisis. Because once you see the numbers, you can't unsee them. The UK has around 43 million people of working age. These are the people the entire system depends on. They pay the taxes. They fund the pensions. They staff the hospitals. 9 million of them are economically inactive. Not working and not looking for work. 1 in 5. That number deserves unpacking because it isn't one problem. It's several, layered on top of each other. The largest group, around 2.8 million, are out due to long-term sickness or disability. That number has been rising steadily since 2019 and recently hit a record high. Among younger people, the driver is mental health. Among older workers, it's musculoskeletal conditions, back problems, and other chronic illness. People in their early twenties are now more likely to be economically inactive due to ill health than people in their forties. That statistic alone should stop you in your tracks. The second largest group, roughly 2.4 million, are students in full-time education. They're investing in their future productivity. But while they study, they aren't contributing to the tax base. Around 1.6 million are looking after family or home, disproportionately women. Around 1.1 million took early retirement before state pension age. Many left during or after the pandemic and haven't returned. The rest are classed as discouraged or otherwise outside the labour market. On top of the 9 million inactive, another 1.87 million are unemployed. Youth unemployment has risen to around 16%. So of around 43 million people of working age, roughly 32 million are actually in work. About a quarter of the working-age population is not in paid employment. Now look at who they're supporting. There are roughly 12 million people above state pension age. The official dependency ratio is 278 pensioners per 1,000 people of working age. That sounds manageable. About 3.6 to one. But when you use the number of people actually working, it drops to roughly 2.7 workers per pensioner. Less than three. By 2047, the latest official projections show the ratio worsening to 302 per 1,000, even after planned pension age rises. ONS modelling submitted to the House of Lords suggests that to hold the current ratio constant, pension age would eventually need to reach 70 or beyond. Under current law, it rises to 67 by 2028, with further increases likely to stay on the table. And the support base is under growing pressure. The fertility rate just hit 1.41. The lowest on record. You need 2.1 to keep the population stable. We're at two thirds of that and falling. The average age of mothers is now 31. The government has expanded funded childcare significantly, and that's a genuine step forward. But the birth rate kept falling right through it. Because the problem isn't just childcare. It's housing. It's wages. It's the cost of being alive in this country while trying to raise a family. The overall population is still projected to grow, mainly through migration. But the pension-age population is growing faster than the working-age population. The number of people aged 85 and over is projected to nearly double, from 1.7 million in 2022 to 3.3 million by 2047. More pensions. More NHS demand. More social care. All landing on a workforce where the ratio of workers to dependants is weakening every year. And here's the part nobody talks about. According to the ONS, at least 1.4 million people in the UK are raising children while simultaneously caring for ageing parents. The sandwich generation. Wider estimates suggest the true figure may be considerably higher. Typically aged 35 to 64, spanning millennials and Gen X. These are people in mid-career. Many in management roles. Peak earning years. Maximum professional responsibility. And they're juggling all of that with school runs on one side and elderly care on the other. Two thirds say their finances are under strain. Carers UK estimates that over 600 people a day quit their jobs to care for a loved one. Research by the Centre for Economics and Business Research puts the average lifetime financial cost of being a sandwich carer at over £345,000 in lost earnings, reduced pension contributions, and direct care costs. Women are more than twice as likely to be the ones who leave work. Every one of those people who leaves is one fewer taxpayer. One fewer pension contributor. One fewer worker holding up the dependency ratio. And they don't just lose their salary. They lose years of compound growth on pension savings. They arrive at retirement with a depleted pot, needing the same support they were once helping to fund. This is about to intensify. As the over-85 population nearly doubles and social care continues to collapse, more people in that 35 to 64 age bracket will face the impossible choice between their career and their parents. The sandwich generation will get bigger. The workforce will come under even more strain. Now layer the health crisis on top. The Health Foundation projects that 3.7 million working-age people will be living with major illness by 2040, a 17% rise on 2019 levels. Already, 3.7 million people who are in work have a health condition that limits the type or amount of work they can do. That number has grown by 1.4 million in a decade. The House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee said it plainly. Those who are already economically inactive are becoming sicker, meaning they're less likely to return to work. The ageing effect that was previously being masked by other factors is now being reinforced by them. So here's the picture. The state pension costs around £146 billion a year. Funded entirely by current workers paying current retirees. There is no pot. The triple lock ratchets it higher every year. The working-age support base is under pressure and weakening. The number of dependants is growing. The people in the middle are getting sicker, burning out, and leaving work to care for parents the state can't look after. The generation behind them is smaller because the birth rate has collapsed. And the generation behind them will be smaller still. Nobody chose this. No generation is to blame. People didn't decide to be priced out of having children. Workers didn't choose to develop chronic conditions. The sandwich generation didn't volunteer to care for ageing parents with no safety net. This is a systems failure. We can argue over whether it's underinvestment in housing, health, social care, and prevention, or poor personal choices of the population at large that have produced a workforce that is too small, too sick, and too stretched to carry what's being placed on it. But this is where we're at. And the weight is growing every year. The arithmetic doesn't negotiate. And right now, it says we're running out of people to pay for the country we've built.

English
0
0
0
10