Tiera Slaughter

@TMZ Wayfarer parties admitted in their settlement they knew about Blake’s concerns during production, admitted they did NOTHING and now they’ll have to pay Blake all her legal fees and costs and, despite all this, some of you still have the courage to say Baldoni is the winner? LMAO

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Blake Lively won't get damages from Justin Baldoni, but he must pay her legal fees. Read more: tmz.me/4xlAdq5

@cschauer106 @NFL_DovKleiman @nypost I would say they've destroyed themselves, but I get what you're saying.

𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: New photos have been released of Dianna Russini and Mike Vrabel KISSING at a bar in 2020. The Vrabel - Russini scandal continues 😳 (via @nypost)

@nsb_1991 @Justice4BJS Just out of curiosity, why did you put wife in quotation marks?

@Justice4BJS What tweet did you have crafted for if he showed up for a pr stunt like Justin’s “wife” ? I’m sure you and the fellow trolls would have praised him, right? 🤡🫠

Yeah - sorry sweetie…. I know I called him a predator but you’re going to have to face him alone. You can wear my shirt though?

@megynkelly Nope. Charlie did not deserve to dies. It’s criminal. Jimmy did not deserve to be cancelled. It infringes in free speech. He is a comedian for Christs sake.

@AdrianneCurry woop woop you win. now you need to add some rugrats!

X has been ugly, as of late. Here's more of my wedding day 7 years ago. I am still that happy

@LibTearCreator1 @Scott_Wiener This is real?? Insanity!!!!

@AllAboutTRH If they rule in her favor regarding the texts of third parties she will be forced to settle. No way she can let Taylor, Ari, Colleen and many other’s texts get blown up.

@DanaLisa777 @realmelanieking He wishes he looked as good as Gosling. LoL

Oh no Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are in severe anguish. Good. Rot in it🫠

@SlaughterTiera @PerezHilton "Specifically, he instructed both parties’ legal teams to properly adhere to the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, which prevent attorneys from issuing statements to the press outside of court that could have a “substantial likelihood” of swaying a jury."