Tweet fijado
TradeMindJournal.com
473 posts

TradeMindJournal.com
@TMJournals
Turning emotional traders into consistent winners ⚡ TradeMind AI: Journal + Statistics + AI Coach. Build your edge → 14-day free trial
United Kingdom Se unió Ocak 2012
11 Siguiendo239 Seguidores

What I'd put on day one of a trading bootcamp about the numbers behind your edge 🧵
1/ Variance can make a coin-flipper look like a genius for a month. Zoom out.
2/ Profit factor over one and a steady curve beats a flashy week.
3/ The honest metric is the one you'd least like to calculate. Calculate it.
4/ A 55% edge means 45% of the time you were 'wrong' and still right to take the trade.
5/ Make it a rule: define your max daily loss before the session, then honor it.
Master the boring parts. The rest takes care of itself.
English

@tradewithgold_ Most trading accounts are blown trying to fight that first entry, just don’t do it
English

@spideycrypt Fair value gaps or whatever the new ICT trend is right now
English

@AndrewTradesNQ I blame social media at this point, it’s learnt behaviour
English

There are so many people trying to pass an eval within 1-2 trades.
Mainly after Lucid announced that -40% discount on those LucidPro accounts. 😅
But if you aren't profitable and don't have an already passed funded account, you are just burning money.
Trading is not a sprint, but a marathon.
You are better off taking things slow and risking properly even when on an eval.
My recommendation would be to risk max drawdown divided by 10 per trade.
For a $50k account with $2,000 max drawdown that would be max $200 risk per trade.
You wont pass the challenge in a day, not even a week.
But you will build correct trading habits and get more practice in, taking more trades, watching price action develop, etc.
After a month of consistent trading and only taking valid setups, you will probably pass it.
Then you keep doing the same things and you get a payout.
Only after getting that payout and covering the expenses of the original account, you can start to scale into more accounts.
Now it is reasonable for you to "fullport evals".
But dont just trade randomly.
Wait for an A+ setup and risk half the drawdown on that trade.
Of course, you will burn through some accounts, but you will get more fundeds faster.
This is just my opinion and nothing I say is financial advice.
English

@TundeTrades_ What made you trade it today after so long?
English

@greenbirdtrader That’s one you’ll remember, congrats on the win 🥂
English

@tr_tradingfx How honest are you in the back testing? That matters more than you’d think
English

To be honest, I cried today.
I've been having one bad day after another without really knowing why, and I'm probably going to lose both of my $50k challenges.
Even though I'm profitable in backtesting, I've been getting destroyed for almost two weeks now, and my morale is at its lowest.
Have a great evening, everyone.

English

After years of charts, sleepless nights, blown accounts, hope, discipline, and disappointment...
I'm finally walking away from forex.
I gave it everything I had.I sacrificed time, money, peace of mind, and parts of myself I'll never get back.
I kept believing the next month would be different. I gave it everything I had, but not every story has the ending we hope for.
Failure is hard. But what's even harder is admitting that sometimes effort alone isn't enough.
To everyone still chasing the dream, I sincerely wish you success.
As for me, it's time to close the charts, stop chasing candles, and start chasing a different life.
Thank you to everyone who was part of this journey.
Goodbye, forex. 💔


English

You don't have a strategy problem. You have a finding an edge problem.
Let's fix it 👇
1/ An edge is small, repeatable, and boring. Anything thrilling is probably a leak.
2/ A coin flip with good risk-reward beats a sure thing with bad sizing.
3/ Edge without execution is just a nice theory with a P&L attached.
4/ Most 'systems' are random with good marketing. Demand the data.
5/ Make it a rule: when in doubt, the position is too big. Cut it in half.
Steal what's useful. Ignore the rest. Protect the account either way.
English

@TMJournals ne thing that helped me was separating "performance review" from "trade review."
P&L tells you what happened.
The review tells you whether the decision was actually good.
English

Strategy is rarely ever the problem, it's what you are doing in-between waiting for your strategy to actually appear
Jaron@Jaronnaii
Trading is one of the few professions where doing less often earns you more.
English

Losing-streak probability, in plain terms:
Losing streaks are a statistical certainty of any real win rate. Over 100 trades, even good systems have high odds of a 5–6 loss run somewhere.
Why it matters: Traders quit working systems, or blow up sized-up accounts, because they treated a scheduled streak as proof the edge died. Knowing the odds in advance is armor.
English

What changed everything for me wasn't a strategy. It was finding an edge.
The breakdown 🧵
1/ Your edge lives in the trades you don't take as much as the ones you do.
2/ Edges decay. The traders who last keep measuring, not assuming.
3/ Small edges, compounded with discipline, beat big calls made on luck.
4/ An edge is a rounding error you get to keep, a thousand times over.
5/ Make it a rule: never risk more than you'd calmly accept losing in full.
Now close the app and let the setup come to you.

English

@JimmyIdann Takes some people 2 years takes others 10 sadly. Most won't even endure it for that long.
English










