CYBERGEM 💎✨

4.1K posts

CYBERGEM 💎✨ banner
CYBERGEM 💎✨

CYBERGEM 💎✨

@UltraTerm

Dev of HIDEAGEM magic stego tool https://t.co/tROfeN5JLB 💎✨ && UltraTerm real terminal emulator for Unreal Engine! ✨💻✨ https://t.co/lowO7AvSC6

ASTRAL ZONE 777 Se unió Kasım 2017
438 Siguiendo3.2K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
Leaked email from Jordan Peterson to Matthieu Pageau Sent 29/05/23: Jordan offers Matthieu a job teaching Bible lessons to Evgeny Lebedev, member of the UK House of Lords and son of "former" Russian KGB/SVR officer turned banker and media owner Alexander Lebedev. What follows is the truth about Matthieu's involvement with Jordan Peterson, and how I was connected to it. My sincere intent in publishing this is for the Pageau brothers to repent of being involved with Jordan Peterson, because it is causing many Christians to be misled. They have to tell the truth before it's too late. The reason why I have this email is because Matthieu sent it to me, along with a bunch of similar correspondence. He sent them to me because, at the time, he wanted my advice for how to handle navigating interacting with these people. This email marked the beginning of the end of my six-year-long friendship with Matthieu, which ended officially in the summer of 2024. In the email, Jordan Peterson offered Matthieu power in the form of money and connections. Not long afterwards, Matthieu stopped sharing these emails with me, he stopped telling me about his interactions with these people at all, and he began communicating with me less and less frequently in general. He first got on Twitter around this time, and Jordan Peterson began helping boost his account (sharing his power and influence with him), which caused him to quickly gain a following. His account was also visibly blessed by the algorithm, which one might guess had something to do with Jordan Peterson's personal ties to Elon Musk. Matthieu was offered power, but in exchange for what exactly? And what did he want the power for? At the time, I thought it was rather interesting that Matthieu was "using" Jordan Peterson like this, because secretly, Matthieu absolutely hates Jordan. He believes (or did at the time) that Jordan is a literal pedophile who sold his soul to the devil for money and fame. It wasn't until later that I realized he had made a huge mistake, and had been tempted and made a deal with something that he didn't understand. Matthieu believed he was being very clever, "tricking the devil," but he didn't see the price he was paying (and would pay) for the exchange. One major problem is that his intentions were not really pure. On the one hand, he saw the deal as a clever way to "spread the gospel of symbolism" to renew Christianity (the exact same thing his brother Jonathan believes he's doing by teaming up with Peterson), but he also had several other objectives: 1. Prove to Jordan Peterson, and the world, that he is the true master of symbolic knowledge, and not his brother Jonathan. Matthieu is extremely jealous and envious of his brother for having capitalized, with Jordan Peterson's massive help, on the symbolic knowledge he published in his first book. He certainly has some valid grievances there, but part of his motivation was revenge, and I think that clouded his judgment. On the very last day we spoke last year, I told him it was not necessary to make this deal with the devil to accomplish that, and I offered to make a website for him (for free) where he could post all of his writings and videos for the world to see. I told him it would be enough for people to see the truth, no weird spiritual compromises needed. He rejected the offer and hasn't spoken to me since then, because I told him that I could not continue associating with him, and helping him write his books, if he was not willing to say anything critical of Jordan Peterson in public. 2. He believes that he is going to essentially single-handedly be responsible for converting the Jews to Christianity, and that his deal with Jordan Peterson "has to happen" in order to accomplish that. That is certainly a noble objective, but having that objective and believing yourself to certainly be part of Biblical prophecy is another thing. That is what he meant in that video interview with Dan Sherven where he said he's trying to unlock a secret riddle in the Bible. He believes that there is a way to sort of "trick" the Jews into becoming Christians in such a way that they can "remain Jews" at the same time. At least that's how he explained it to me in private. I'm not a super Bible expert, but it sounds pretty theologically suspicious... He also believes that he will be one of the two witnesses/prophets in the book of Revelation. I know this because he told it to me for years, because he believed that I would be the other witness along with him! I never believed this or fed into this delusion, I just ignored it because I wasn't really sure what to say, and over the years I'd learned not to push back too much when he'd say something wild about the Bible because he would usually get very angry at me (such as the time he told me he thought there might actually be "two Holy Spirits" and not one, and I told him that was certainly heretical nonsense). So one of the reasons why he made this deal with the devil is because, in my opinion, he is suffering from spiritual delusions of grandeur. I'm sorry Matthieu, I'm so sorry for posting this in public, but you are going down a bad path and are going to face way worse consequences if someone doesn't pull you back to Earth! 3. Matthieu wants to make some money like his brother Jonathan did Shortly after he shared this email with me, and right before he stopped sharing info about these people with me, he said these words to me: "I think I'm going to make a lot of money soon." Make of that what you will. What Matthieu gave Jordan Peterson in exchange Matthieu really seemed to believe that he was masterfully tricking Jordan Peterson into giving him something without any cost to himself, but that is certainly not the case. One thing that he gave Peterson in exchange is his implicit blessing. Many (if not most) of Matthieu's followers believe that since he evidently respects Jordan (given their ongoing relationship and collaboration) that Jordan Peterson is therefore trustworthy and worth following as a Christian. This is a big problem, because Jordan Peterson is not a Christian. He serves the devil, not Jesus Christ, and he is in fact actively working to harm and mislead Christians (I have several other posts illustrating how). Last year, I made a single post criticizing Jordan Peterson, and several of Matthieu's followers immediately attacked me. Matthieu said nothing. In fact, he messaged me in private and told me that I looked like an "obsessed" loser for criticizing Jordan in public (though I'd only made one or two tweets at the time), telling me that he had no intention of ever counter-signaling Jordan Peterson publicly because it would harm his mission of converting all of the Jews to Christianity, telling me that he has been chosen by God for the task. That was actually the first time he revealed to me that he believed he was on a special mission to convert the Jews. Before then, I had no idea he took himself so seriously like that. Again, I think it's a noble objective, I hope he succeeds. But... The Pageau brothers' role in deceiving Christians Earlier this year, I discovered, to my horror, that his brother Jonathan Pageau had co-authored a paper/document with Jordan Peterson on the subject of the book of Revelation. I discovered that in that document, they made the argument that something like a digital ID is required on the Internet in order to deanonymize all users so that they can be held accountable for their speech, allegedly in order to make people behave like better Christians. That is not an exaggeration. They tried to use the words of the Holy Bible to justify it. It is one of the most sinister and insidious wolf in sheep's clothing attacks on the Church that I have ever seen. The emerging global digital ID system is without a doubt a scheme of the spirit of the Antichrist, and Jordan Peterson (at the behest of his masters) is using Jonathan Pageau as a tool in order to try to deceive Christians into accepting what will, undoubtedly with time, transform into something resembling the Mark of the Beast. I began raising the alarm about it immediately, and I messaged Matthieu and asked him to please help me speak the truth, indicating that his brother had crossed a line he absolutely should not have (falsely interpreting Bible scripture in order to lead Christians to the slaughter). Matthieu's reaction was to (again) block me and ignore me. He said and did absolutely nothing to call out his brother or Jordan Peterson. He refused to speak the truth, likely out of fear of losing the power and connections that Jordan had conferred to him. His brother Jonathan, who I had been politely messaging with privately for a few months up until that point, responded to my posts by privately calling me a snake and a coward, and for some reason accusing me of using "black magic." Believe it or not, he also accused me of using black magic attacks years ago against Jordan Peterson, which led to him having to be placed into a coma in Russia. He accused me of this because, it turns out, Matthieu told him that I had done so! This is not something I was aware of, and I certainly did no such thing. Just what in the devil is going on with the Pageau brothers? Matthieu's deep betrayal of me 💔 To understand why all of this was so confusing and heartbreaking to me, I unfortunately need to share some personal things. First of all, the way Matthieu and I met all those years ago is that he contacted me out of the blue after he saw me preaching against Jordan Peterson (trying to warn Christians that he is not to be trusted) using an anonymous account that no longer exists. He told me that he had not seen anyone else calling out Jordan Peterson, and that he had grave misgivings about him, and was not happy about his influence on his brother Jonathan. I shared with him all of the information I had at the time, and he agreed with me that Jordan seemed to fit the pattern of a false prophet. So our friendship began by him coming across my criticisms of Jordan Peterson online, and it ended when I began criticizing him again online. In the end, he betrayed me to work with the very man whom I had worked to try to warn the Church and nations about. In my opinion, there is something very spiritually dark about this, and during my interactions with his brother Jonathan late last year and early this year, I saw that same darkness at work in him. I tried very hard to convince Jonathan that it was an extremely bad idea to work with Jordan the way he has been, and tried to convince him that Jordan is not exactly what he seems. Jonathan eventually agreed with me that yes, he (Jonathan) would pay a serious price if Jordan Peterson did not eventually convert to Christianity. I tried explaining to him that the situation is far more serious than that, that if Jordan truly turned against his masters that they would likely literally kill him. They would crucify him. Jonathan, while intelligent and generally well-meaning, is extremely naive. He has absolutely no frame of reference for the scale of evil that he has involved himself with (such as speaking with Jordan Peterson and Peter Thiel at their accursed "ARC" conference this year). Matthieu, on the other hand, doesn't have the excuse of ignorance. He knows everything that I know about Jordan, and he chose the path that he did anyways. A Call to Repentance Please, Matthieu and Jonathan, put on the armor of God and tell the truth! Christians are being led to the slaughter by Jordan Peterson and his friends, and your continued silence and collaboration with him are helping him achieve that. It is absolutely not enough to simply stay silent and stop interacting with him or talking about him (assuming you're doing even that much). It is not! Your flocks trust you and look up to you, and you are not giving them clear signals and information. They are confused, and the devil is using that confusion to his advantage. You do not have to be afraid of the devil. Please, tell the truth! "Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness." ~ James 3:1 ❤️‍🔥
CYBERGEM 💎✨ tweet media
English
16
3
46
10.6K
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
No, prophecy and divination are not the same. Prophecy is knowledge revealed to man directly by God. Divination is trying to gain knowledge using occult systems such as cutting an animal open and trying to predict the future based on looking at its guts. The serpent in Genesis did not ask questions about the future, it asked a question about God's word intended to confuse and deceive Eve. And that is exactly what Matthieu is doing: He is asking questions about God's word in the Bible in such a way that it is confusing and deceiving people.
English
0
0
1
21
Drew Straker
Drew Straker@drewstraker2000·
@UltraTerm 2/ My sense is that prophecy is related to divination, since it involves loosely making a guess about the unknown based. I think Matthieu says the snake in the garden for eg was encouraging divination when asking questions about the future "will you really die?"
English
1
0
0
15
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
There are some serious problems here with Matthieu Pageau's teachings about dream interpretation and the story of Joseph: 1. Joseph's dreams were not "divinatory" as he claims. Divination is explicitly forbidden as a sin (including in Matthieu's own framework). They were prophetic dreams and Joseph was not practicing divination. 2. Correct understanding of the dreams didn't come from rumination (effort of man). Joseph himself says that understanding of dreams comes directly from God: "I cannot do it," Joseph replied to Pharaoh, "but God will give Pharaoh the answer he desires." - Genesis 41:16 "Do not interpretations belong to God? Tell me your dreams." - Genesis 40:8 Joseph does not say that he gained the occult power of divinatory dream interpretation as a result of "being in exile," he says that he literally cannot interpret dreams himself at all, that understanding comes directly from God. Matthieu's interpretation is an inversion of the entire relationship between human effort and divine grace that Joseph's story specifically illustrates. His proposed understanding of dream interpretation is structurally closer to that of Babylonian occult practitioners who tried to develop techniques and methodologies for accessing interpretation, rather than to Biblical figures like Joseph or Daniel who explicitly attribute understanding of dreams to God's direct revelation. "No wise man, enchanter, magician or diviner can explain to the king the mystery he has asked about, but there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries." - Daniel 2:27-28 Matthieu's attitude towards dream interpretation can be summed up as "I can do it, because I have developed the capacity through exile, rumination, and the correct symbolic framework." While Joseph says "I cannot do it." Joseph dissolves his ego so that God can work, while Matthieu builds his ego up in the belief that he himself is the source of divine interpretation and revelation.
Drew Straker@drewstraker2000

@UltraTerm 3/ Whereas Joseph in Egypt interpreting the dreams of Pharaoh is an example of ruminating and waiting for higher insight before sharing. (I think). Images from an old post from Matthieu attached.

English
10
0
1
434
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
The problem here is that Matthieu's definition of divination is false; he has redefined divination so broadly that it swallows ordinary Christian spiritual life. There is no such thing as a "divinatory dream," that is a false teaching he invented. Divination is a form of systematic interpretation of seemingly random information in order to try to gain knowledge, such as analyzing animal entrails to try to predict the future. It is explicitly forbidden as a sin in the Holy Bible. Thinking about your dreams and trying to understand how they are a reflection of yourself and creation is not divination.
English
0
0
1
19
Drew Straker
Drew Straker@drewstraker2000·
@UltraTerm 5/ I am thinking, If you ruminate on a "divinatory" dream its not divination anymore, because you are not buying into and acting on the loosely formed predictions prematurely, but only in due course as the answer becomes clear.
English
1
0
0
13
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
Let it be done to me according to your word.
CYBERGEM 💎✨ tweet media
English
0
0
1
296
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
>This inadvertently helps them with tracking people Pardon me, but the top-tier theory is that the ultimate objective is total information control. Corporations lusting after money is at best a vehicle for pursuing the concrete annihilation of online anonymity.
vx-underground@vxunderground

Yeah, so basically the current prevailing schizo internet theory is that AI nerds have destroyed the internet and created infinite spam. The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human. The advertisement goons no longer want to pay as much to social media networks. Social media networks, in full blown panic of losing potential revenue, decided to lobby governments saying "we gotta protect the kids! ID everyone to protect the kids from pedophiles!". The social media networks know this doesn't really protect kids. But, it does two things (and a third accidentally). 1. They now can identify who is human and who is AI slop machine, or enough to appease the advertisement goons 2. Advertising to children is a general no-no from politicians, or something, so with ID verification they can say with confidence they're not advertising to children because it's been ID verification. Basically, they can weed out the children and focus on advertising to adults 3. The feds can now tell who is human and who is AI slop. This inadvertently helps them with tracking people and serving fresh daily dumps of propaganda, or whatever they want to do. It's a win-win-win for advertisers, social media networks, the government, and any business which does data collections. It fucks over everyone else. Chat, I'm not going to lie to you. This is an extremely good conspiracy schizo theory and I unironically believe it.

English
1
0
10
279
vx-underground
vx-underground@vxunderground·
Yeah, so basically the current prevailing schizo internet theory is that AI nerds have destroyed the internet and created infinite spam. The advertisement goons are now incapable of determining who is a bot and who is an actual human. The advertisement goons no longer want to pay as much to social media networks. Social media networks, in full blown panic of losing potential revenue, decided to lobby governments saying "we gotta protect the kids! ID everyone to protect the kids from pedophiles!". The social media networks know this doesn't really protect kids. But, it does two things (and a third accidentally). 1. They now can identify who is human and who is AI slop machine, or enough to appease the advertisement goons 2. Advertising to children is a general no-no from politicians, or something, so with ID verification they can say with confidence they're not advertising to children because it's been ID verification. Basically, they can weed out the children and focus on advertising to adults 3. The feds can now tell who is human and who is AI slop. This inadvertently helps them with tracking people and serving fresh daily dumps of propaganda, or whatever they want to do. It's a win-win-win for advertisers, social media networks, the government, and any business which does data collections. It fucks over everyone else. Chat, I'm not going to lie to you. This is an extremely good conspiracy schizo theory and I unironically believe it.
vx-underground tweet media
English
388
3.7K
24.2K
673.1K
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
No, it does not make sense, and the story of Job does not support Matthieu's theology. In fact that scripture completely contradicts his teachings. Satan in Job's story is not serving a special role of testing aimed at renewing and strengthening Job, as Matthieu teaches. Satan was trying to argue, using lies, that Job is corrupt and should be prosecuted as such. He was trying to have Job destroyed. The telos is condemnation, not restoration. Perhaps most importantly, Job was not in need of renewal. Satan's accusations were completely false, Job was already a virtuous man. The story is not about God designing a testing mechanism to investigate human loyalty, it is a demonstration of what true faith and trust in God looks like, and how devastating Satanic lies and accusation are. In fact, Job's friends in the story who attempted to attribute that kind of meaning to Job's suffering were explicitly rebuked by God: "You have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has." - Job 42:7 They incorrectly tried to find theological cause and effect explanations for Job's suffering. They were wrong, just as Matthieu is. The idea that Satan has a holy nature also directly contradicts Christ's words: "He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." - John 8:44 Satan wants to murder and devour us. There is no holy version of this. Christ stated it plainly.
English
0
0
0
69
ban-e
ban-e@Esteban444222·
@UltraTerm Kinda makes sense . Just read the story of Job
English
1
0
0
74
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
Matthieu Pageau saying that he "has to know that there is a holy version of Satan" so that he can "get out of some of the dilemmas" that he's in. I have spent the past few days systematically dismantling Matthieu's broken symbolic framework and false teachings, and have proven that they ultimately reject Jesus Christ. Anyone who follows Matthieu's teachings would have crucified Christ our Lord in the first century. I understand the root errors he's making and how they have corrupted his cosmology and theology, but since he has rejected all gentle feedback, and my written words have no way of reaching his audience anyways, I am not going to bother explaining them. After he publishes the book he's working on right now, in which he will formally present his errors to the Church, I will go on camera to explain exactly how his teachings are anti-Christ. It's sad to see him do this, but I have faith that God will somehow use it for good.
English
3
0
6
346
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
my cryptographic primitive's PRNG/stream cipher API it has a key/seed/state recovery security of 2048 bits over 3.5 GB/s at 2 rounds in the paper, i will argue that 2 rounds is likely sufficient and that 4 rounds is a conservative margin
CYBERGEM 💎✨ tweet media
English
0
0
1
178
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
i am the elf who never sleeps i see our stars in the night some say magic i say woah! i am the elf who lets you know
English
0
0
2
153
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
@drewstraker2000 Thank you, here is my response: x.com/UltraTerm/stat…
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm

There are some serious problems here with Matthieu Pageau's teachings about dream interpretation and the story of Joseph: 1. Joseph's dreams were not "divinatory" as he claims. Divination is explicitly forbidden as a sin (including in Matthieu's own framework). They were prophetic dreams and Joseph was not practicing divination. 2. Correct understanding of the dreams didn't come from rumination (effort of man). Joseph himself says that understanding of dreams comes directly from God: "I cannot do it," Joseph replied to Pharaoh, "but God will give Pharaoh the answer he desires." - Genesis 41:16 "Do not interpretations belong to God? Tell me your dreams." - Genesis 40:8 Joseph does not say that he gained the occult power of divinatory dream interpretation as a result of "being in exile," he says that he literally cannot interpret dreams himself at all, that understanding comes directly from God. Matthieu's interpretation is an inversion of the entire relationship between human effort and divine grace that Joseph's story specifically illustrates. His proposed understanding of dream interpretation is structurally closer to that of Babylonian occult practitioners who tried to develop techniques and methodologies for accessing interpretation, rather than to Biblical figures like Joseph or Daniel who explicitly attribute understanding of dreams to God's direct revelation. "No wise man, enchanter, magician or diviner can explain to the king the mystery he has asked about, but there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries." - Daniel 2:27-28 Matthieu's attitude towards dream interpretation can be summed up as "I can do it, because I have developed the capacity through exile, rumination, and the correct symbolic framework." While Joseph says "I cannot do it." Joseph dissolves his ego so that God can work, while Matthieu builds his ego up in the belief that he himself is the source of divine interpretation and revelation.

English
0
0
0
57
Drew Straker
Drew Straker@drewstraker2000·
@UltraTerm 3/ Whereas Joseph in Egypt interpreting the dreams of Pharaoh is an example of ruminating and waiting for higher insight before sharing. (I think). Images from an old post from Matthieu attached.
Drew Straker tweet mediaDrew Straker tweet media
English
1
0
0
444
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
Matthieu Pageau is now going on Christian podcasts to teach that lucid dreaming is "wizardry" that turns you into a "snake." That is a very harmful false teaching. Honestly, it's so ridiculous that I wasn't sure he was being serious at first, but he is. He also thinks that "magicians" are using lucid dreaming to distort our reality for malicious purposes. He also claims that people commit sins in lucid dreams, such as stealing, and they then lose control of themselves while awake and begin committing those same sins as a result. It is one of the most absurd, bizarre, and false things I have ever heard someone say about dreams. He is also publishing a book about dream interpretation, that he is now claiming is actually intended to teach Christians that they must never try to interpret their dreams under any circumstances, because it is demonic and a form of sorcery. This is completely unscriptural and should be rejected by the Church. It is extremely dangerous to make people afraid of their own dreams and to accuse people of committing a sin by even just remembering their dreams or having a lucid dream. This will lead to vicious witch hunts of people in the Church if they talk about their dream experiences, and make people afraid of themselves (dreams are just part of ourselves). Absolutely unbelievable. youtu.be/YR8mXpgTevo?t=…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
4
2
7
2.1K
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
>baby mouse deer baby mouse deer
CYBERGEM 💎✨ tweet media
English
0
0
4
171
CYBERGEM 💎✨
CYBERGEM 💎✨@UltraTerm·
i have joined the mouse deer herd ! they do a lot of singing when no one is around
English
1
0
2
238