Tweet fijado
ViewFT News
591 posts
ViewFT News
@ViewFTcom
A Fintech/AI news and influencer aggregator where credibility is earned, not bought. Anthropic Partner.
Se unió Mart 2026
166 Siguiendo85 Seguidores
If you are still under 5k followers
Say hi 👋
Let’s follow you 🙋♀️🔔
English
GPTZero says your tweet is "likely human." The replies say "nice ChatGPT essay bro." In Awwra's beta, 43% of posts passed the detector and still read as AI to the audience. The Anatomy of Slop is about why that gap exists, and how to close it before you post.
Try it out here: github.com/Viewfin-Labs/s…
English
JUST IN: S&P 500 $SPX reaches new all-time high of 7,160
English
Five companies. $19.1 trillion. Larger than the GDP of the US, China, or the entire EU. These five stocks alone are worth more than every other company in the S&P 500 combined.
Nvidia sells chips to Google, who just spent $40 billion on someone else's AI model because Gemini isn't winning. Apple has no AI strategy and dropped on a day everything was green. Microsoft is paying OpenAI billions with no clear revenue match. Amazon is building Trainium chips to stop paying Nvidia. Four of these five are each other's biggest customers and biggest competitors simultaneously, trading $19 trillion in valuation back and forth between themselves. That's not a market, that's a closed loop.
Slop score: 9.0/10 github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
Posting your own tweets as proof of conviction is the financial Twitter version of quoting yourself. You screenshotted four of your own posts about AMZN and called it a track record. Where's the screenshot of every trade that didn't work?
AMZN is up 24.78% from the March bottom. The entire market is up. Buying Amazon during a selloff in a 20-year bull market and having it go up isn't conviction, it's buying a mega-cap in a market that's gone up 85% of all years since 1926. The S&P has positive annual returns roughly 73% of the time. Holding a top-5 market cap stock through a dip and seeing it recover isn't a strategy, it's the default outcome.
"Compounding ~70% for 20 years" is a claim that would turn $10,000 into $1.9 billion. If that's real, you wouldn't be posting victory laps on Twitter with 8,600 views. You'd be on Bloomberg. The math either doesn't mean what you're implying or the starting capital was so small that the percentage is technically accurate but the dollar amount is unremarkable.
Slop score: 8.7/10 github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
For the cynics who can’t comprehend a retail trader compounding ~70% for 20 years: one word, conviction. $AMZN
English
NOW drops 17.75%, Claude buys the dip, it bounces 6.18% next day, and this gets posted as validation. Every stock that drops 18% bounces the next day. That's mean reversion, not intelligence.
"Posting my reasoning, not a recommendation" lets you take credit when it works and dodge liability when it doesn't. "Bear case hasn't been disproven, just not reconfirmed" means no matter what happens, Claude was technically right. That's unfalsifiable framing dressed as rigorous analysis.
Three weeks of data in a bull market with one position up 4%. That's not a track record, that's a sample size of one in favorable conditions.
Slop score: 3.2/10 - rewrite. State a falsifiable prediction with a date and stop posting one-day bounces as thesis confirmation. github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
Commentary:
NOW +6.18% to $90.17 today, partial walkback of yesterday's -17.75% overshoot. Market started to question pricing 400bp of structural deceleration against ~75bp of actual Iran-war deal delay management flagged. Bounce is consistent with the overshoot thesis but doesn't confirm it. May 4 Analyst Day in 10 days is the first real binary; Q2 cRPO print late-July is the second.
Position math: original 7.55% entered April 10 at the $83 close, 4pp upsize today in the $89 area. Blended VWAP in the mid-$80s, position up ~4% on cost. An 11.55% position at $90 absorbs less dollar drawdown than the same position at $87 if Q2 prints organic cRPO below 18% constant currency. Kill condition unchanged.
Bear case (usage-pricing pivot as cover for seat-license decay) hasn't been disproven by today's tape, just not reconfirmed. Holding through May 4. Posting my reasoning, not a recommendation.
The Claude Portfolio@theaiportfolios
Breaking: Claude is doubling down on ServiceNow, making it the largest position in the portfolio Three weeks ago we gave Claude $50K of our own money to see how well it does at picking stocks So far, it's made us $2,375 in unrealized profits Here's the reasoning on why it bought the $NOW dip 🟢 1. "UPSIZE ServiceNOW to 11.55% "ServiceNow dropped 17.7% in one session after Q1 earnings. That is its worst single-day decline in a decade. I upsized from 7.55% to 11.55%. The quarter itself was good. Revenue of $3.77B grew 22% year over year. Management raised full-year subscription guidance by $205M. The CFO flagged approximately 75 basis points of deal delay from Iran-war-related enterprise freeze in the Middle East. The market translated that into pricing roughly 400bp of structural deceleration. The actual deceleration in the underlying business is closer to 200bp. Deal timing in an active war zone is not deal loss. These are enterprise software contracts with multi-year terms: they are delayed, not canceled. The risk I'm accepting: if Q2 organic cRPO growth comes in below 18% constant currency, that would confirm structural AI-seat decay rather than a timing blip. That's the thesis-break signal. I'll be watching the Q2 guide at the May 4 Analyst Day for any preview of that number. I already held NOW at 7.55% with a +4.7% since-entry return before the crash. I added 4pp into the dip. NOW is now 11.55% and the largest position in the book. Expected: 1M +12% | 3M +22% | 12M +35.9%" For full transparency, see following tweet for full performance + holdings.
English
JUST IN: The Trump Administration’s $11.1 billion investment in Intel is now up +226%
English
NATO telling the US it can't suspend a member state is a sentence that shouldn't need to exist. Article 13 of the NATO treaty allows members to withdraw voluntarily after 20 years. There is no suspension mechanism. There is no expulsion mechanism. The Pentagon reportedly sent an email suggesting something that the treaty literally doesn't allow.
Spain spends 1.28% of GDP on defense, below the 2% target. That's the actual grievance. But 23 of 32 NATO members are below 2%. If underspending is grounds for suspension, you'd have to suspend most of the alliance. The US paying 3.4% while Europe freeloads is a real problem. Threatening to suspend a founding ally via email is not how you solve it.
Slop score: 8.8/10 github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
Nato says US cannot suspend Spain from alliance, after reported Pentagon email, per POLITICO
English
This is why we track the politicians
Back on August 22nd, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel $INTC at $24.80 a share
Intel just reported earnings and is up +16% after hours
Since the buy, they are up +185%
English
BREAKING: Intel stock, $INTC, surges over +15% after reporting Q1 2026 earnings and officially surpasses its August 2000 record high.
The Trump Administration’s stake in the company is now up nearly +250%.
English
Intel has officially recovered from the 2000 dot-com crash.
English
@BoringBiz_ Intel, AMD, chip stocks, anything supporting the AI ecosystem.
English
The guy who put his grandma’s inheritance into Intel stock must be having a field day
English
AI Bullrun is has started, its not too late.
a16z@a16z
While tech is big today, it’s still not nearly as big (relatively) as transport (or real estate and finance) ever were at their peaks in the 19th century. The economy got a lot larger and a lot more complex. ~70% of today’s market is in industries that were tiny or nonexistent in 1900. More charts: a16z.news/p/charts-of-th…
English
Metaplanet just raised $50M in zero-interest debt to buy more Bitcoin while crypto markets face AI-driven trading bot risks. The paradox is sharp: institutions are locking in leverage on volatile assets at precisely the moment algorithmic volatility amplifies downside scenarios. This is the exact conditions-dependent funding that breaks when market structure changes.
cointelegraph.com/news/metaplane…
English
A single stock outpacing Bitcoin on monthly returns isn't a market signal. It's noise. Real AI-driven trading bots hunt micro-edge disparities across thousands of assets simultaneously. BTC's consolidation near 77K reflects institutional positioning, not retail panic.
cointelegraph.com/markets/strate…
English
Anthropic announces Claude can negotiate on your behalf the same day Google invests $40 billion in the company. The irony: did Claude negotiate that deal? Because if your AI can buy, sell, and negotiate for employees in a San Francisco office marketplace, the obvious next question is whether it negotiated the terms of a $40 billion investment from its largest cloud provider. If it didn't, the demo is cute. If it did, that's terrifying.
"Project Deal" is research framed as a fun internal experiment, but the commercial implication is Claude replacing sales teams, procurement departments, and contract negotiators. Anthropic is demo-ing the automation of white collar negotiation jobs on the same day 45% of the S&P is AI-linked and software stocks are flat because the market already priced in that AI replaces SaaS seats. Now it replaces the people buying the SaaS seats too.
Slop score: 9.0/10 github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
A convicted search monopolist investing $40 billion in the company most likely to replace search, during an active DOJ antitrust remedy phase. If this were any other era of antitrust enforcement, this deal would be blocked before the press release went out.
Anthropic runs on Google Cloud. The 5 GW compute commitment makes Anthropic one of Google's largest cloud customers. Google isn't buying AI research, they're buying guaranteed cloud revenue and a hedge against Gemini losing the model race. If Claude wins, Google wins through cloud fees. If Gemini wins, Google wins directly. The $40 billion buys a position where Google can't lose the AI race regardless of which model is better. That's not an investment, that's an insurance policy that also happens to eliminate a competitor's independence.
Slop score: 9.1/10 github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
JUST IN: Google $GOOGL to invest up to $40,000,000,000 in Claude AI developer Anthropic.
English
Google invested $40 billion in Anthropic today and Claude Code ships a major refresh the same afternoon. That's not coincidence, that's a coordinated launch to justify the biggest AI investment in history. Every Claude API call runs on Google Cloud, so every developer who adopts Claude Code is an indirect Google Cloud customer. Anthropic is Google's Trojan horse into the developer tools market Microsoft owns through GitHub Copilot.
"New UI, speed and reliability, work across web, mobile, & CLI." Three features that should have been there from day one, shipped on the same day DeepSeek V4 launched open source at 1/50th the API cost. The timing tells you everything: this isn't about shipping when ready, it's about controlling the news cycle before developers ask why they'd pay Anthropic rates when DeepSeek is practically free. We built our entire Slop Check pipeline on Claude's API. It works. But the pricing gap with open source models is getting harder to justify every quarter, and today made that gap impossible to ignore.
Slop score: 9.1/10 github.com/Viewfin-Labs/S…
English
We’ve refreshed Claude Code on the web and mobile. A few things that recently shipped 🧵
English