Carson

16.4K posts

Carson banner
Carson

Carson

@carsonmcd

numbers & sports & space

Maryland Se unió Haziran 2009
464 Siguiendo248 Seguidores
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq The data is accurate. This is well known easily documented data. GDP growth & job & wage numbers are based on government records. Stock market is obvious. Important lesson - an anon on social media saying “nuh uh” is meaningless. x.com/i/grok/share/5…
English
1
0
0
48
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
“Recent trends” from 1976 when you said 1975 wasn’t recent. You do realize the graphic is wrong. But you clearly demonstrated the biggest issue. “Everything on social media is obviously true.” We have the information available to us and people would rather just accept what an “influencer” says.
English
1
0
0
23
The Green Dragon Tavern
The Green Dragon Tavern@greendragonhq·
If you want a good economy vote Democrat down the ballot in 2026 and 2028. Stop sending our money towards endless wars.
The Green Dragon Tavern tweet media
English
86
582
2.1K
32.5K
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Yes, the original post provided some factual info about recent trends that folks might want to consider when they cast their vote in upcoming elections. And you’re right that, since the topic was recent history and provided stats for the past 50 years, your reply was irrelevant.
English
1
0
0
26
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq I don’t tell people how to vote. I hope they seek out the information they need to make the choice that best aligns with what they value. I will apologize that me not saying that in my first comment caused you to create your own narrative that hurt your feelings.
English
1
0
0
29
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq You’re right again…it was wrong for me to assume you considered both of the sentences of the original post. You only addressed one in a vacuum without the essential context of the other. My mistake. Obama ended Iraq, Biden Afghanistan. I wonder which D will end Iran?
English
1
0
0
35
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq Yeah, a comment about wars on a post about wars doesn’t follow. Obviously. Maybe the OP was claiming no funding went to wars under democrats. I’m kinda curious why you dodge the other issues I presented. But I don’t want to overwhelm you.
English
1
1
0
30
David Shuster
David Shuster@DavidShuster·
Four years ago when Ken Starr died, Bill Clinton stated he read the obituary and realized "his family loved him," which he considered "something to be grateful for.” Clinton added he was taught not to speak ill of the deceased, saying, "I have nothing to say.” #trump
English
203
508
4.9K
527.8K
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Exactly. That is why it was wrong for me to assume that your comment or our conversation had anything to do with the original post we were both responding to. The post was about how recent trends should inform your vote. On that topic, your factual comment a non sequitur.
English
1
0
0
32
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq My original response stated a fact. You tried to pick a fight to “win.” Which is sad, honestly. Conversations don’t need a “winner.” You’ll understand that when you mature.
English
1
0
0
27
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Lol. You’re right…it was wrong for me to assume that your comment or our conversation had anything to do with the original post we were both responding to. You remain undefeated!
English
1
0
0
29
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq The topic of the original post you responded to is recent trends and how it should inform your vote in 2026 & 2028. You have the memory and literacy of a goldfish.
Carson tweet media
English
1
0
0
30
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq I had to search for it, the last time I mentioned “vote” was a day ago. Yeah, I feel pretty comfortable with my understanding of assumption.
English
1
0
0
26
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Do you know what the word assumptions means? I’m not making any assumptions. I’m conceding that one example from 60 years ago is more important than everything since then when determining “today, a vote for which party is more likely to lead to an endless foreign war”
English
1
0
0
29
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq Boy, your assumptions are not my problem. I do wonder why people just assume themselves into their feelings.
English
1
0
0
25
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@MotowarriorX Ah, so it was Trump’s plan to drive up oil prices then buy oil at very high prices from Iran while we’re at war with them this whole time! Brilliant!
English
0
0
0
15
Robert Ledferd
Robert Ledferd@MotowarriorX·
So what. So you are upset you paying higher gas. So selfish. This was expected. Currently the oil price steady in the $94
Carson@carsonmcd

@Ben_Around @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 Cleanly executed? This war caused an oil crisis that the administration is so desperate to address that they dropped economic sanctions to buy oil from the country we’re at war with. There are no clear goals and no end in sight. You are a parrot.

English
1
0
1
111
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Lol. You’re right buddy. One example from 60 years ago is more important than everything since then when determining “today, a vote for which party is more likely to lead to an endless foreign war”. Great job.
English
1
0
0
22
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq You mean to tell me using your tactic is “trying to eke out a gotcha victory.” Fuck, that was better than I thought it would go.
English
1
0
0
25
Tommy Vietor
Tommy Vietor@TVietor08·
These fucking morons are allowing Iran to get $14 billion in the middle of a war against them. This is the biggest, dumbest concession ever given to Iran by the US and all you need to know about what a disaster Trump’s policy is.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent@SecScottBessent

Iran is the head of the snake for global terrorism, and through President Trump’s Operation Epic Fury, we are winning this critical fight at an even faster pace than anticipated. In response to Iran’s terrorist attacks against global energy infrastructure, the Trump Administration will continue to deploy America’s economic and military might to maximize the flow of energy to the world, strengthen global supply, and seek to ensure market stability. Today, the Department of the Treasury is issuing a narrowly tailored, short-term authorization permitting the sale of Iranian oil currently stranded at sea. At present, sanctioned Iranian oil is being hoarded by China on the cheap. By temporarily unlocking this existing supply for the world, the United States will quickly bring approximately 140 million barrels of oil to global markets, expanding the amount of worldwide energy and helping to relieve the temporary pressures on supply caused by Iran. In essence, we will be using the Iranian barrels against Tehran to keep the price down as we continue Operation Epic Fury. This temporary, short-term authorization is strictly limited to oil that is already in transit and does not allow new purchases or production. Further, Iran will have difficulty accessing any revenue generated and the United States will continue to maintain maximum pressure on Iran and its ability to access the international financial system. So far, the Trump Administration has been working to bring around 440 million additional barrels of oil to the global market, undercutting Iran’s ability to leverage its disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump’s pro-energy agenda has driven U.S. oil and gas production to record levels, strengthening energy security and lowering fuel costs. Any short-term disruption now will ultimately translate into longer-term economic gains for Americans – because there is no prosperity without security.

English
517
1.9K
9K
606.2K
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Ben_Around @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 They’re going to buy weapons and fund groups that will harm their attackers at home. Some anon who will agree with the government no matter what saying “nuh uh, government says that can’t happen but we need to give them money” is meaningless.
English
1
0
0
10
Ben Around
Ben Around@Ben_Around·
@carsonmcd @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 Oh Lord. I said their military isn't going to be able to use their money to buy weapons. That doesn't mean that the average person can't buy food! 😕
English
1
0
0
145
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Nam was initiated in the 60s. LBJ’s term ended in 1969. You’re trying to eke out a gotcha victory by pretending I’ve been inconsistent. All the most expensive foreign conflicts that have been started since then were initiated by Republicans. Trump is on a path to join.
English
1
0
0
28
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
You’re doing a few “interesting” things. -claiming the 70s was before the 60s -claiming all expenditures on a war fall on whoever was president when it started -claiming the United States has never had a single conflict prior to now with Iran -claiming the deaths in Vietnam are some weird “fake propaganda” or something to convince you to dismiss it I’m honestly not sure which one to be most concerned about.
English
1
0
0
51
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Ben_Around @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 Weren’t you just saying they have no way to utilize their money? Now preventing it is The Goal! I guess the cash we’re giving them in exchange for their oil isn’t going to Costco after all! 🤣 How do y’all constantly produce such incoherent contradictory arguments every time?
English
2
0
0
25
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq I said since the 60s. “You’re saying this is the biggest terrorist attack since 9/11? What about 9/11?” Yes…like I’ve said multiple times, the top 3 most expensive conflicts since those initiated in the 60s were started by Republicans. Iran is slated to soon be number 4.
English
1
0
0
37
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Ben_Around @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 Cleanly executed? This war caused an oil crisis that the administration is so desperate to address that they dropped economic sanctions to buy oil from the country we’re at war with. There are no clear goals and no end in sight. You are a parrot.
English
1
0
0
127
Ben Around
Ben Around@Ben_Around·
@carsonmcd @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 Comparison. Trump war is cleanly executed and the infrastructure-so far remains intact. This is wisdom. He changed the rules of engagement to allow the generals to make calls that once only President Obama would have made.
English
1
0
0
40
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Ben_Around @MotowarriorX @TVietor08 You’re the one who is confusing *Iraq in 2003* for *Iran in 2026*. You must be impaired. Do you have a more reasonable explanation for why you’re talking about Iraq in 2003?
English
1
0
0
25
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq I said “$200 billion for Iran would pass every D conflict” Due to character limit I shortened Democrat-initiated to D I’ll say it again…if Trump gets the $200 billion he asked for to fund the Iran conflict, it will be more expensive than every D-initiated conflict since the 60s
English
1
0
0
51
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq Yes…exactly as I said. Who was president when that conflict started, during its peak, and accounted for most of the spending associated with it?
English
1
0
0
40
Carson
Carson@carsonmcd·
@Th3TaterTot @greendragonhq You’re the one who chose to use something that happened 60 years ago to counter a post citing stats over the past 50 years. Still, far & away the most expensive over that time are Afghanistan, Iraq, and Gulf War. $200 billion for Iran would pass every D conflict.
English
1
0
0
60
Rawpotato
Rawpotato@Th3TaterTot·
@carsonmcd @greendragonhq Yup, not one conflict in the last 36 years under a democrat president. Not Syria, Lybia, Afghanistan, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Sudan, Yemen..... Not one.
English
1
0
0
61