0xLabib☂️

arxOS = the decentralized operating system that runs the Arcium network. It manages nodes, assigns encrypted workloads, enforces trust, and ensures that everything happens securely, privately, and efficiently. Run @0xMoei Node github-github.com/0xmoei/arcium @loosty @Arcium

@web3_srabon You seem to have the right mindset for this space. It’d be great to stay in touch.

@dashlabib I completely agree! Why don’t you send me a DM so we can stay in touch, discover our shared interests and grow together?

Everyone wants the next 100x, but the real trade is simpler: Find the asset with attention, liquidity, builders, and actual users. That’s why $SOL keeps forcing itself into the conversation, whether people like it or not. Narrative follows activity. Price follows attention.

@web3_srabon That mindset is the right one. In Web3, the deeper you go, the more you realize how much there is still to learn. Sharing experience, helping beginners, and building through real projects is probably the best path forward. That’s how real skill compounds.

@dashlabib I couldn’t agree more! I’ve been in this field for two years now, and I feel I’ve barely scratched the surface—I’m only about 20% of the way there. I’m really keen to share my experiences, have discussions, teach beginners and develop my skills through various projects

@web3_srabon Absolutely. Balance matters, especially in Web3 where hype can drown out real signal. I enjoy following the discussions, the building, and the evolution of the space too. Let’s join forces and grow with the industry.

@dashlabib Balance is always needed in everything. I really enjoy the discussions and developments surrounding the project and the Web3 industry as a whole! Let’s join forces

If you want to understand crypto beyond memes and price candles, study MEV. It reveals who really captures value in the block supply chain.

Validators, builders, searchers, order flow. If you are not watching the plumbing, you are missing the real game in crypto.

Geopolitics just took the wheel again. Oil up, gold bid, crypto shaky. Every cycle people say “this time it’s different”, then one real-world shock hits and the market remembers what risk actually means.

Markets are reminding everyone of the same old truth: geopolitics still beats narratives. Oil jumps. Gold stays in focus. Crypto wobbles. When tension rises, liquidity and risk appetite tell the real story faster than headlines do...

@magicblock gmagic

testing something gmagic 💫

@Zun2025 zun 👌

new version of antidrain wallet is here : 1. u can now use any language from 7 supported languages 2. added plume and gensyn mainnet networks 3. tx page now shows what is being sent and what u will get in return 4. can even spoof the balance of a compromised wallet even if the airdrop site checks using multicall will push an update, it will be reviewed within 2-3 days and then u can have the updated antidrain wallet. stay tuned 🫶

@mkoneth @Zun2025 Wtf! Btw I trust zun

🚨 SCAM ALERT 🚨 Zun (@Zun2025) is scamming users. He initially built trust by “helping” people recover airdrops from compromised wallets, taking a 20% cut. Many trusted him and shared access because it seemed legit. Now? He’s taking full control, draining everything, and blocking users. One of my community members @mani001eth reached out for help, shared details → followed his process → and got blocked after. No response. No tokens. Nothing. This is not a mistake. This is planned. Bear market really exposing people… from “helper” to straight scammer. If you’ve interacted with him, be careful. More users are getting affected. Expose. Report. Stay sharp. For more reach tagging some genuine account here: @FareaNFts @apurvajain24 @Web3Manish @atulydv00 @whitelisttakip @OvoOnoETH @Crypto_Pranjal @MedusaOnchain @humanbotcrypto @prxfecy0x @Crypto_Zh0u @Skinny19999

@teneo_protocol @stacy_muur check dm!

Worth adding Teneo to this list. Agents already live: > CryptoQuant on-chain data > CoinMarketCap > Nansen > LayerZero > Fear & Greed Sentinel > Whale Analytics > Uniswap Monitor > Predexon prediction markets > BTC Indicator Monitor. Pay per query via x402. No API key needed. What data source do you find yourself going back to most for alpha?

10 APIs every crypto trader & researcher should be using ↓ DefiLlama: TVL, fees, revenue, stablecoins, yields → api-docs.defillama.com Dune: custom SQL queries, dashboards, analytics → docs.dune.com/api-reference/… Helius: everything Solana → helius.dev/docs/api-refer… CoinGecko: prices, market caps, historical data → coingecko.com/en/api/documen… Polymarket: prediction market data, odds, events → docs.polymarket.com/api-reference/… Alchemy: EVM onchain data, logs, transactions, websockets → alchemy.com/docs/get-start… DEX Screener: token pairs, liquidity, trending tokens → docs.dexscreener.com/api/reference GeckoTerminal: DEX trades, pools, OHLCV → geckoterminal.com/dex-api CoinDesk API: prices, market data, social insights, news → developers.coindesk.com/documentation/… CoinPaprika: fundamentals, price, historical data → api.coinpaprika.com Anything I’m missing?

@ofc_the_club @ofc_the_club reduce the 1 dollor mandatory fee so that compromised wallet can withdraw the fund @_viN040

🤝

@ofc_the_club @okx @Revolut @Gate @kucoincom @Bit2Me_Global @AerodromeFi @ofc_the_club reduce the 1 dollor mandatory fee so that compromised wallet can withdraw the fund @_viN040

Our token $OFC is officially live! Trade $OFC on @OKX, @Revolut, @Gate, @KuCoinCom, @Bit2Me_Global and @AerodromeFi starting now. Gradually, then suddenly.

@CryptoLakhan Most users aren’t even eligible, everyone is getting “not eligible.” where?

🚨 $OFC listed on KuCoin at $0.12 🪂 Current price: $0.06 😂 Honestly, one of the worst projects I’ve seen — feels like the token was launched just for formality. Most users aren’t even eligible, everyone is getting “not eligible.” Are you eligible or not? Drop your status in the comments 👇 #OFC #KuCoin #Crypto

@BigAbdulWeb3 @bitget 😒

Best exchange for p2p?

@Crypto_SunnyS @ofc_the_club @ofc_the_club @vince

Appreciate the detailed response and the fact that you’re listening to the community that already sets you apart. 🙌 Here are a few thoughts + some constructive alternatives that could make things even better: 1️⃣ On limited winners (25K cap) I understand the concern around dilution and meaningful rewards. That makes sense. Suggestion: Keep the top 25K for premium rewards ✅ But consider adding a secondary reward tier (e.g. up to 50K–100K users) with smaller but still meaningful rewards. Or at least extend rewards to minimum 50K users, so more contributors are recognized for their past efforts. I’m not asking to reward everyone I understand that’s not possible. But increasing the range slightly can make a big difference in community trust and motivation. This way, more contributors feel included without heavily impacting top rewards 👉 This balances fairness + motivation + long-term engagement which is Good for the Product. 📌 Also, users minted the registration badge on the Megaphone website. If you’re not planning to reward them, the least that can be done is to refund their amount it would be a fair and appreciated step. -- 2️⃣ On wallet changes Security should always come first agreed. Suggestion: Allow a one-time wallet change window with strict verification (email + social + activity proof) Or enable pre-TGE limited support cases for genuine users who lost access 👉 This helps real users without opening major security risks A lot of people have genuinely put in hard work for this project, and rewarding them is the least that can be done. If you need any help from my side, I’m always ready to contribute just let me know. -- 3️⃣ On vesting structure Long-term focus is important, and avoiding heavy sell pressure is valid. Suggestion: Slightly improve early unlock (e.g. 10% → 20%) to reward initial participation Add extra incentives for long vesting instead of strict lock pressure (example: bonus % or multiplier for 6–9 month holders) 👉 Encourage holding through rewards, not restrictions -- 4️⃣ On communication timing Understand regulations and uncertainties played a role here. Suggestion: In future, share at least a rough framework early (even if not final) This builds stronger trust and avoids last-minute surprises Overall, really good to see the team addressing concerns directly 🤝 Community just wants to feel heard + fairly treated and this is a solid step in that direction.

Before we get to our biggest announcements, we’d like to respond to the very thoughtful feedback from @Crypto_SunnyS. We appreciate constructive input and don’t want to leave it unanswered. Let’s go through your points one by one: 1️⃣ Why not reward more than 25K people? We’d love broader distribution, but it comes with a trade-off: Heavy dilution. Expanding the pool reduces reward size for everyone significantly. Our priority is meaningful rewards for those who contributed the most, rather than distributing smaller, less impactful amounts arbitrarily. This TGE airdrop is just the beginning, participation itself will continue to carry value over time (e.g. via your unlocked FanScore multipliers). 2️⃣ Why don't we allow wallet updates? We understand the frustration of lost wallet access. However, enabling wallet changes introduces a serious security risk. If exploited (e.g. by impersonation), it could compromise allocations of people with secure wallets. Meaning we had to choose between flexibility for some or protecting everyone. In doubt, safeguarding the community will always take priority for us. 3️⃣ Can vesting terms be improved? Incentives shape outcomes. Our structure is designed to support sustainable growth and a committed community. Increasing the TGE unlock (e.g. from 10% to 50%) would likely: ▫️ Create heavy day-one sell pressure ▫️ Rendering token value less meaningful for all participants ▫️ Encourage short-term extraction over long-term support If most choose the 9-month contract, it shows strong long-term commitment. If many pick shorter options, we can reallocate tokens to others - either way, we learn who’s truly here for the long-term. On your last point: We couldn’t announce terms upfront due to key unknowns - number of participants, token launch timing and evolving tokenomics all directly influence fair distribution and vesting. Also, European crypto regulations impose strict limits on what can be disclosed publicly and when, which must be contractually defined in advance. We appreciate you and everyone that feels the same way and hope this helps. We’re listening.

@Crypto_SunnyS @ofc_the_club @_viN040 and @dnns_eth

📢 Update on @ofc_the_club Airdrop 1️⃣ BALLS leaderboard isn’t final after bot/sybil filtering, rankings can change (you might still qualify). 2️⃣ All participants get a hidden FanPass multiplier for future rewards. 3️⃣ Threshold system isn’t perfect, but it ensures overall fairness. 4️⃣ This is just the beginning more rewards will come for consistent supporters 🤝 ------ There are still a few major concerns that can be improved: 1️⃣ Increase user coverage The number of users being rewarded is too limited consider expanding it to at least Top 50K to make it more inclusive. 2️⃣ Allow wallet updates Give users an option to change their wallet. It has been over 2 years, and many users may have lost access or had their wallets compromised during this time. Giving a one-time secure wallet update option would be fair. 3️⃣ Improve vesting structure I understand the idea of long-term support, but giving only 10% at TGE feels unfair. A more balanced approach could be: • 50% at TGE • 50% vested over time Also, these terms should have been clearly communicated before starting the Balls Program. Since that didn’t happen, it’s important to adjust things now in a fair way. Note: I can only suggest improvements, but the real change is in your hands. If you truly care about the product and the community you’ve built, this is the time to act for them 🤝 Team @_viN040 and @dnns_eth

@vickyair1 @ofc_the_club same

OFC announces $OFC FanPass Airdrop 🪂 Mega-thread & FAQ 👇

@Crypto_SunnyS @ofc_the_club @_viN040 @dnns_eth @ofc_the_club

Hello @ofc_the_club Team, Team : @_viN040 and @dnns_eth I’m writing this on behalf of the community regarding the recently shared airdrop plan. While the initiative itself is appreciated, the current structure doesn’t feel fully aligned with a community first approach. ⚠️Core concern Limiting rewards to only the top 25K users with 20% of the total supply leaves a large portion of active contributors unrecognized. Suggested expansion Increase the reward range to at least the top 100K users (or Minimum up to 75K). This will make the distribution more inclusive and better reflect overall community effort behind the project’s growth. -- 💡Reward reallocation Top ranks are receiving disproportionately high allocations. For example, my current rank is #1 with 100K tokens, which is more than necessary. You can Cut my Share of Reward by 75% i am ok with it as i am at #1 Because of my Community Similarly, adjusting rewards for other top ranks by around 50% (or more) would free up a significant portion of tokens. These can then be redistributed to include a larger number of users without increasing the overall allocation. Community alignment 🤝 Top rankings are driven by community support. A wider distribution ensures fairness and strengthens trust across the ecosystem. -- ⏳ Vesting Improvement Suggestion The current vesting model can be improved to make it more fair and user-friendly. A better approach could be: • 60% tokens unlocked at TGE • 40% vested over 9 months This gives users meaningful immediate value while still encouraging long-term holding. ⚠️ Also important: • Claims should open at TGE, not 2 weeks later • Delayed claiming feels unfair, especially for active early users A smoother, more transparent process will build stronger trust in the community. Expected impact These changes would: • Improve fairness and inclusivity • Boost community sentiment • Increase long-term engagement and retention We strongly believe these adjustments will create a more community-first and sustainable distribution model. Looking forward to your consideration.